LuSH-101
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1993 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
Not really blowing me away either, not yet at least ... Just had a quick play but will play some more. It sounds good no doubt about that but not exceptional I wish I still had my sh-101 to compare this with but it somehow lacks to me some balls. The presets are good though
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool
-
- KVRAF
- 16977 posts since 23 Jun, 2010 from north of London ON
mmmm...with my eyesight the way it is the GUI could definitely be a little larger here...
On Reaper it really is not much of a CPU piggie...but on X2....weeeeellllll...
On Reaper it really is not much of a CPU piggie...but on X2....weeeeellllll...
Barry
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
If a billion people believe a stupid thing it is still a stupid thing
- KVRAF
- 2686 posts since 5 Feb, 2004 from Nevada City, California
i played with the demo for 15 minutes on my celeron 900mhz laptop with built in speakers and i am in love! i can lay down a 2 layer bass line on my sub-notebook, so i am relieved and i'm sure that my 3.0ghz quad will handle it fine. i really like what i hear so far - VERY true to analog and to the 101.
my left hand went through a glass panel the other day and i am typing/playing with one hand for 2 more weeks, but i think that i will go ahead and buy LuSH tonight!
it has been strange waiting a chunk of my life away for this product, but it looks like a real hit. i may be selling a certain grey, modded, monophonic analog synth one day soon.
my left hand went through a glass panel the other day and i am typing/playing with one hand for 2 more weeks, but i think that i will go ahead and buy LuSH tonight!
it has been strange waiting a chunk of my life away for this product, but it looks like a real hit. i may be selling a certain grey, modded, monophonic analog synth one day soon.
- KVRAF
- 2488 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from Sydney, Australia
For example: Check presets > Single Zone > Tempo Based > Sequence
I usually *hate* sequenced presets - but it will show off what it's capable of!
I usually *hate* sequenced presets - but it will show off what it's capable of!
Last edited by dalor on Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Cowbells!
- KVRAF
- 2686 posts since 5 Feb, 2004 from Nevada City, California
btw - i own 3 products and i get 10% in my 'crossgrade' area.
Last edited by ford442 on Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12037 posts since 12 May, 2008
Wow. I had my doubts but I didn't expect it to be this unremarkable. I was hoping it would be decent. The sound is just not really very good. There are old Reaktor 4 ensembles from 10 years ago that sound more analog than this. I don't get it.
- KVRAF
- 2323 posts since 2 Feb, 2009 from Germany
Sooo... installed Lush 30 minutes ago. And so far i must say - it's f*cking awesome!
I think the best softsynth i had every played. Great sound, incredible presets, highly versatile. The mixer, with EQ on each channel and master-fx send - perfect!
Till a half hour ago i thinked DIVA was the best synth 2012, but now, it's Lush
From multi layer sounds, till drumkits and complete sequences with bass and drumloop parts, all possible. Well done D16, and specially Sebastian with many many awesome presets.
I think the best softsynth i had every played. Great sound, incredible presets, highly versatile. The mixer, with EQ on each channel and master-fx send - perfect!
Till a half hour ago i thinked DIVA was the best synth 2012, but now, it's Lush
From multi layer sounds, till drumkits and complete sequences with bass and drumloop parts, all possible. Well done D16, and specially Sebastian with many many awesome presets.
- KVRAF
- 24415 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Now those are some VERY different opinions 15 minutes after product release 
-
- KVRian
- 1281 posts since 9 Mar, 2008 from netherlands
Just because a company spends years developing something doesn't automatically justify a higher price and generally isn't it the market that dictates the value of a product? For example... Two people make chairs one does it faster than the other does that mean he should take less than the one who does it slower. How innovative is Lush and what took the developers so much time..EvilDragon wrote:People love everything for close to free nowadays, eh? It's 3.5 years of work in this plugin, that should be appreciated without pricepoint whining.
I'm just playing devils advocate here by the way. I wish D16 lots of success.
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
My first impressions:
- Very small GUi texts which makes the GUi very fiddly. Found no way to change the GUi so far.
- Very high CPU use: Even with a monophonic sound and a single layer i get up to 35% with some Unison and around 15-20 without Unison on my Core 2 quad Q6600 CPU
. In the preset the seem to be very few "basic" Lead spounds using the original features of the SH-101 and only very few Lead presets use the "SH-101" filter mode at all.
Saying it is better than Diva or any other synth is for sure a bit too early for my taste.
Ingo
- Very small GUi texts which makes the GUi very fiddly. Found no way to change the GUi so far.
- Very high CPU use: Even with a monophonic sound and a single layer i get up to 35% with some Unison and around 15-20 without Unison on my Core 2 quad Q6600 CPU
. In the preset the seem to be very few "basic" Lead spounds using the original features of the SH-101 and only very few Lead presets use the "SH-101" filter mode at all.
Personally this time i try to keep cool. In the past every new synth was "the best one ever" for me and after a while i was disappointed...Cyforce wrote: I think the best softsynth i had every played. Great sound, incredible presets, highly versatile. The mixer, with EQ on each channel and master-fx send - perfect!
Till a half hour ago i thinked DIVA was the best synth 2012, but now, it's Lush![]()
Saying it is better than Diva or any other synth is for sure a bit too early for my taste.
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 2323 posts since 2 Feb, 2009 from Germany
Well it's my personal impression, and i'm blown away! But everyone will have a different impression and meaning about it.Ingonator wrote:Personally this time i try to keep cool. In the past every new synth was "the bets one ever" for me and after a while i was disappointed...
Saying it is better than Diva or any other synth is for sure a bit too early for my taste.
Ingo
I think through the 8 layers + mixer Lush can do soooo many sounds, which other synth's couldn't do. And specially the basic sounds, this is i guess highly depending on the personal taste. But for me - if a synth give me such impression after half hour playing - it must be good
- KVRian
- 622 posts since 14 Jun, 2006 from Finland
I respectfully disagree with people who think this does not sound analog. I think this synth really delivers.
I have a few analog synths and in my opinion this is in the same league. I've had 2 or 3 SH101's and 202 and in my opinion lush101 has got that same liquid Roland sound. There is filter stepping like someone mentioned but that is the case with many other synths as well. It does not bother me that much to be honest.
I have been looking into buying myself an 101 or 202 because I have missed that sound so much, but I think I will go with this instead. D16 you got my money.
Perhaps people who don't like this synth don't like 101 either?
I disagree with the "only synth you ever need" slogan and I am also not declaring this as the best softsynth I know (there is no such thing), but I would still say that D16 nailed it this time.
I wish there was some mix knob for the distortion effect. I will probably end up using some of the effects I already have because of this. Very good sounding insert effects imo.
People don't forget to change the quality setting from the options.
I have a few analog synths and in my opinion this is in the same league. I've had 2 or 3 SH101's and 202 and in my opinion lush101 has got that same liquid Roland sound. There is filter stepping like someone mentioned but that is the case with many other synths as well. It does not bother me that much to be honest.
I have been looking into buying myself an 101 or 202 because I have missed that sound so much, but I think I will go with this instead. D16 you got my money.
Perhaps people who don't like this synth don't like 101 either?
I disagree with the "only synth you ever need" slogan and I am also not declaring this as the best softsynth I know (there is no such thing), but I would still say that D16 nailed it this time.
I wish there was some mix knob for the distortion effect. I will probably end up using some of the effects I already have because of this. Very good sounding insert effects imo.
People don't forget to change the quality setting from the options.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
