Suggested long before anyone had ever heard of Monark, but even that extreme level of component tweaking is unnecessary. All that was needed was parameter range accuracy which DIVA cannot provide due to its semi-modular nature.chilly7 wrote:i thinkit would be good idea to moodel some varietiobs of Mini Moog and Uhe can sell them as addons to Diva.
but what i would do if i ould be in charge of Uhe is:
i guess it is quite possible to achive all possible sounds of a particular guir let say mini Moog in this example.
What they need to do is as i know are two ways:
1) to model each component in mini Moog all different variention components
2) to model each component in mini Moog and be able to change them and tweak them
so we migh be able to do modification in a mini Moog on software level which will be ausetic to a real mini Moog.
(so lets sey i could change this transistor to that transistor and etc)
A new competitor to Uhe Diva has arived!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 5521 posts since 6 May, 2002
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM
-
- KVRian
- 867 posts since 26 Jul, 2009
so you bump a 3 month old thread just to make a point you already made a million times.electro wrote:Suggested long before anyone had ever heard of Monark, but even that extreme level of component tweaking is unnecessary. All that was needed was parameter range accuracy which DIVA cannot provide due to its semi-modular nature.
and a point that makes no sense anymore as there's already a few products that offer what you ask .
moreover ,unless u own a minimoog or you are planning to copy minimoog patchbooks ,parameter range accuracy is pointless and in no way as important as extra features or ability to swap over different modules.
the most important thing is nailing the sound....and that's where Diva first and monark to more detail did. minimoogV , minimonsta and minimax (anc countless other emus) had pretty much same parameters ranges and features of a real minimoog yet they sucked balls compared to the real deal. it's all about the sound.