Yes, I like Presswerk GUI too, but, as I said, totally different styles. I don't think the GUI style of Presswerk would go well in something as complex as, for example, CS-80, ARP 2600 V or Modular V.exmatproton wrote: Well, i like presswerk, satin and repro (the newer ones...) over these new arturia skins. They scale better, have good zoom level and all the text is just good visible. In contrast to arturia's.
Official Arturia VCollection5 thread
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRAF
- 2802 posts since 31 Aug, 2011
Thats because they use a much smarter approach, namely 1 set of large UI images which are being scaled down as you go below 200%. (Which is fullsize.)Numanoid wrote:u-he plugs have several settings for gui size, without the installer file becoming humongus
Arturia on the other hand took the probably worst approach thats technically possible: Several sets of UI images in several different sizes consisting of thousands of files in hundrets of folders, (example minimoog: 18.899 files in 528 folders), which not only results in a hefty RAM usage per instance but also creates quite some overhead on the harddrive because all these small files dont always entirely fill a cluster. (Example minimoog: Actual Size of bitmap folder 218MB, Size on Disk 256MB.)
Not good for people on low-capacity SolidState Drives...the whole set of plugins will probably take space in the gigabytes only for the images alone. (Unless of course you manually relocate the stuff, which luckily is possible. But of course the size will stay the same.)
Really makes you wonder who greenlighted such a wasteful UI system. If i had anything to say over there, no way in hell i had sanctioned this because after all better ways are available.
- KVRAF
- 3397 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
after playing and testing the new Mini, i can say i am impressed by what they did. The old one is jaggy and when modulating at high rates, it sounds aweful, to be honest. Lots of digital artifacts/aliasing. That is less apparant in the new one, so props!
The new one sounds better (to my taste; better resonance response), sounds a bit more like the real deal and has smoothing per midi value (e.g. value 56 to 57 when changing cutoff). Which is more of a stepless feel and because of that feels more "real".
The new one sounds better (to my taste; better resonance response), sounds a bit more like the real deal and has smoothing per midi value (e.g. value 56 to 57 when changing cutoff). Which is more of a stepless feel and because of that feels more "real".
- KVRAF
- 6279 posts since 8 Jul, 2009
I have owned many of the synths represented in the Collection. I've definitely used them all except a Synclavier and Modular 55 (I have used a 15). In general I was very impressed with the Collection 4 sound - although I didn't do a direct comparison. In fact of all of those the only one I own now is a Minimoog. But they all sound great. Exactly like the originals? Probably not. But close enough for use in music.exmatproton wrote:In that case they are different for sure. Don't know which one i like more. Some further testing with high resonance and pulses would result in a defenitive answer.
What is your opinion? Which one do you prefer?
Between the Mini 4 and 5... frankly close enough. I mean when it comes to analogue synths, each specimen within a given make/model usually sounds slightly different than the others. the Arturia synths are withing the ballpark as far as I am concerned.
#NONFR Check out my music at Bandcamp
Free Streaming!
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
- KVRAF
- 43937 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
For me, the text is nearly invisible around the keyboard area on 'Analog Lab 2'.
Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
- KVRAF
- 3397 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
The BP/LP switch on SEM isn't properly aligned. The click (audio) from BP to LP is later, then the actual UI.
- KVRAF
- 2175 posts since 10 Mar, 2006
Arturia have always seemed to be completely insulated from everyone else, neither interacting, nor learning from them. Whether it be customers or other developers. So it's no wonder they are still doing things in the worst possible way. With only a few bright spots here and there, because of so much pressure on them.ENV1 wrote:Thats because they use a much smarter approach, namely 1 set of large UI images which are being scaled down as you go below 200%. (Which is fullsize.)Numanoid wrote:u-he plugs have several settings for gui size, without the installer file becoming humongus
Arturia on the other hand took the probably worst approach thats technically possible: Several sets of UI images in several different sizes consisting of thousands of files in hundrets of folders, (example minimoog: 18.899 files in 528 folders), which not only results in a hefty RAM usage per instance but also creates quite some overhead on the harddrive because all these small files dont always entirely fill a cluster. (Example minimoog: Actual Size of bitmap folder 218MB, Size on Disk 256MB.)
Not good for people on low-capacity SolidState Drives...the whole set of plugins will probably take space in the gigabytes only for the images alone. (Unless of course you manually relocate the stuff, which luckily is possible. But of course the size will stay the same.)
Really makes you wonder who greenlighted such a wasteful UI system. If i had anything to say over there, no way in hell i had sanctioned this because after all better ways are available.
It always was a company who succeeded because of their guis and the guis sold the products to the masses.
There are so many people out there in the world who think simply, and having something pretty on their desktop, in their DAW, something they've always dreamed of having as real hardware...is too much to resist. It's akin to being able to buy the hottest chick of your dreams, for a mere 200 bucks. But as reality often has proven, the external looks/packaging may be a 100% beaut, but the inner substance is very often, very unfortunately, far far less, disappointing to various degrees. Almost as if the product itself knows it is compensating, right from the start.
I wish this wasn't so, but since the early days Arturia has been like this. And instead of focusing years into perfecting a few products sound-wise (like uhe and a few smaller devs), ONE by ONE until they are right, they've instead created a plethora of average ones. Almost taking cue from the post WW2 capitalist world system, where nothing is of the best quality it could be any more, rather just mass-produce everything, distract them with ever more new shit for them to digest and spend on. They will never be fulfilled, but each new product will cement in them that drive to find fulfillment. Because there is no substance to anything, the new product on the horizon promises to fix that. Or maybe the one after it.... maybe
The day a company focuses on building genuine relationships with people, on building genuine quality that no one can criticize, not on selling products, is when it will sell more than it will be able to produce.
"The educated person is one who knows how to find out what he does not know" - George Simmel
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - Jesus Christ
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - Jesus Christ
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 23 May, 2005 from West Country, UK
I hear U-He are getting really worried that there will be byte shortages in the futureHunterKiller wrote:The day a company focuses on building genuine relationships with people, on building genuine quality that no one can criticize, not on selling products, is when it will sell more than it will be able to produce.
-
- KVRAF
- 2802 posts since 31 Aug, 2011
May be, but this is getting ridiculous. 256MB of graphics for a 23MB plugin with so few controls, (minimoog), consisting of literally thousands of files in hundrets of folders, that just seems like total overkill and i can only hope that this will not become the new norm.HunterKiller wrote:Arturia always was a company who succeeded because of their guis and the guis sold the products to the masses.
(Just imagine what it would do to your C: drive when every plugin would suddenly drop such filebombs on it. Eventually OS backups will take an eternity to make and restore and their own size will of course grow out of control too. And im not even talking about limited space SSDs here.)
- KVRAF
- 5375 posts since 22 Jul, 2006 from Tasmania, Australia
Do the bitmap references then allow user skinning though?
I wonder what I want in here
-my site is gone and music a mess
-my site is gone and music a mess
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 23 May, 2005 from West Country, UK
Maybe some bright spark could write a script to clean out all files from the unwanted resolutions.
Edit: Or replace all the interface graphics with the ones from Poly-Ana
Edit: Or replace all the interface graphics with the ones from Poly-Ana
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12014 posts since 12 May, 2008
If I'm not mistaken I think arturia have exposed some controls to automation that weren't before, like the switched on the arp and probably waveform selectors on the moog. So that's a cool thing.
-
- KVRAF
- 2802 posts since 31 Aug, 2011
Only to find that the UI would come up blank unless the one you want to keep happens to be the 200% folder.lnikj wrote:Maybe some bright spark could write a script to clean out all files from the unwanted resolutions.

