KVR Audio

c_voltage · Post by **c_voltage** » Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:09 pm

I got it ! Will tested.

c_voltage · Post by **c_voltage** » Fri Oct 07, 2016 8:17 pm

Oh my...Damn tested 1.1
Freeze save work.
Properly save in project (with keeping properly timbre) work.

Here they are tears of happiness.
I do not know what else to say.
Well, there is still can reproduce cpu-related issue what i described in this post http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 0#p6568878
but honestly, believe me - it does not matter in comparison with the above-described two problems (especially about properly save\reload).
Thanks much for update !

4ndy · Post by **4ndy** » Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:09 am

c_voltage wrote:Oh my...Damn tested 1.1
Freeze save work

That is good to hear

c_voltage · Post by **c_voltage** » Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:18 pm

4ndy wrote:
c_voltage wrote:Oh my...Damn tested 1.1
Freeze save work
That is good to hear

Yes. )

Hmm. BTW, in Reaper plugin are show aprox. 8-9% for me

(without bridge), really strange, i mean, in comparison with Studio One (v2 and v3) - in which it stable show about 37% for me on default preset.
Well, again, it not critical, just i continue some researches about his cpu usage in different circumstances.

EDIT: In Plogue Bidule and Ableton Live the same - 31-33%
Thus, Reaper really makes some miracles here.

4ndy · Post by **4ndy** » Sat Oct 08, 2016 2:03 pm

c_voltage wrote: Hmm. BTW, in Reaper plugin are show aprox. 8-9% for me (without bridge), really strange, i mean, in comparison with Studio One (v2 and v3) - in which it stable show about 37% for me on default preset.
Well, again, it not critical, just i continue some researches about his cpu usage in different circumstances.

That is most interesting.

My main DAW is Sonar Plat, although I do have Reaper too. I hardly use Reaper because I am lazy and cannot be bothered learning to use two DAWs, but it may be worth while trying out Adaptiverb with it...

c_voltage · Post by **c_voltage** » Sat Oct 08, 2016 2:37 pm

4ndy wrote:
c_voltage wrote: Hmm. BTW, in Reaper plugin are show aprox. 8-9% for me (without bridge), really strange, i mean, in comparison with Studio One (v2 and v3) - in which it stable show about 37% for me on default preset.
Well, again, it not critical, just i continue some researches about his cpu usage in different circumstances.
That is most interesting.

My main DAW is Sonar Plat, although I do have Reaper too. I hardly use Reaper because I am lazy and cannot be bothered learning to use two DAWs, but it may be worth while trying out Adaptiverb with it...

Yes, else tested now in Reaper, and for example about 11% on more heavy presets than default (like from Drone section). Honestly i'm surprised. Perhaps Reaper uses some technologies for its internal optimization, well, although i already knew that Reaper is most optimized (less cpu hungry) host, but that such the difference, it's extraordinary.

Congrats to the authors.
Regarding the use of, i agree, i also find his workflow not quite convenient (via compare with the same S1 for example), but this is not the first time when I see the advantageous features in Reaper (the first time was related with routing, which could not be achieved in other hosts). Probably still have to take it on board.

zynaptiq · Post by **zynaptiq** » Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:15 pm

Hey all,

back in the office from AES and a bunch of meetings afterwards. My "BIOS clock" is still all over the place

Will have a look at the state of v1.1 ASAP.

IIRC Reaper shows the CPU load as a percentage of all available cycles rather than % of one core/thread as other DAWs do (again, this is an "IIRC" with heavily jet-lagged brain).

Cheers,
Denis

c_voltage · Post by **c_voltage** » Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:15 am

zynaptiq wrote:Reaper shows the CPU load as a percentage of all available cycles rather than % of one core/thread as other DAWs do

Ehh...although yes, thought about it too. (S1 meter really show usage of 1 core of four). Miracle was so close.

EDIT
(What regarding my method via jbridge, well, although it improves situation slightly, but need to notice that work only to aprox. 4 instances, then appear cpu spikes. Well, nonetheless this is quite useful variant. Well, or at least with 1-2 instances this creates some illusion that they do not load anything, and it more comfort

)

mcbpete · Post by **mcbpete** » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:30 pm

Is v1.1 still in beta/invite-only or will we all be able to play with the update soon ?

zynaptiq · Post by **zynaptiq** » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:33 pm

It's still in beta but if you email us we can hook you up

mcbpete · Post by **mcbpete** » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:37 pm

Ooh nice, will do

Does it use our same iLok license or is there a separate license for the beta builds ?

zynaptiq · Post by **zynaptiq** » Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:27 pm

It uses the same license

TabSel · Post by **TabSel** » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:59 am

zynaptiq wrote:Hmm, we'll look into that automation stuff – quite possible that the radio-group widget we're using doesn't actually send automation. Thanks for the heads-up!

Any news on v1.1 which hopefully solves this issue?

zynaptiq · Post by **zynaptiq** » Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:11 am

We think we have a fix for the radio group automation issue, yes; still working on some host specific stuff for 1.1.

plexuss · Post by **plexuss** » Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:09 pm

I made a demo track using Adaptiverb which I posted some posts back. I recently fleshed it out into a nice full blown track. The original demo track has been used completely in the finished track. Here is the demo track and the finished track so you can maybe hear Adaptiverb in a full mix...

Demo track

https://soundcloud.com/plexus-productions/excitations

Final track

https://soundcloud.com/musicofplexus/excitations

Zynaptiq Adaptiverb released