One-Synth-Challenge: General discussion thread
- KVRAF
- 3204 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
-
Korg Supporter Korg Supporter https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=386399
- KVRAF
- 1871 posts since 4 Oct, 2016
Next month should be Exakt Lite.
- KVRian
- 735 posts since 31 Oct, 2019 from Wonderland
What are you talking about? Exact Lite was released a long time ago, the commercial Exact was released recently.
https://www.kvraudio.com/product/exakt- ... -sonicbits
- KVRian
- 735 posts since 31 Oct, 2019 from Wonderland
Oh, sorry, I didn't know! I didn't even include the excellent dark horse JS80P by Attila M. Magyar here just because it's Windows/Linux.Taron wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 1:55 pm Since Tyrell isn't out for Apple Silicon, yet, it would be another skipped month for me, unfortunately. I loved Tyrell! Seems like Urs was planning on updating it at some point....but not yet. I'd wait, assuming it won't be too long.
Zebralette would be nice. Haven't tried the latest, yet.
Good news about Tyrell N6! Given that they have indeed updated several of their free ones, as well as probably working on Zebralette/Zebra 3, it is not known when, but it will probably happen.
For this reason I said that while Zebralette 3 is not quite ready yet, we could have a month of the old Zebralette, which has not yet debuted in OSC with a new GUI. Or spend two months of Zebralette (old/new) in a row.ElVincente wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 2:23 pm I think zebralette3 is still very hungry non optimised state at this point, it would be better to wait for next beta.
But it definitely would be great time to make another Odin2 round imho![]()
+1 for Odin II, one of my favorite synthesizers! A little heavy for me, but that's no reason to give up)
I will also mention another suggestion that goes a little beyond the classic OSC rules, But sometimes this happens here)
This is one of the synthesizers from Modular Samples: Oi, Grandad!, Quetzalcoatl or Shapey! All of them are based on deep manipulations and modulations with samples. It is important that each of them comes with its own content folder (weighing several hundred MB
-
Korg Supporter Korg Supporter https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=386399
- KVRAF
- 1871 posts since 4 Oct, 2016
It was recently rewritten alongside Exakt's release, and I don't remember it being proposed before.IV! wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 5:46 pmWhat are you talking about? Exact Lite was released a long time ago, the commercial Exact was released recently.
https://www.kvraudio.com/product/exakt- ... -sonicbits
- KVRian
- 735 posts since 31 Oct, 2019 from Wonderland
It may have been/will be rewritten, I don't know about that. But you can check it on Plugins4Free, and the oldest comments there date back to May 15, 2020. I just played with it 2-3 years ago.Korg Supporter wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 9:50 pm It was recently rewritten alongside Exakt's release, and I don't remember it being proposed before.
-
- KVRAF
- 2725 posts since 19 Dec, 2010 from North America
Hey everyone.
I would like to hold a public vote on a rule. Currently, the rule states that if a participant refuses to send project files after a co-organizer requests them, they are disqualified. However, there is significant nuance involved, and each situation should be considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, a participant might outright refuse, make excuses, or even ignore messages. In such cases, disqualification alone may not be enough. Upholding the integrity of these challenges is essential. I am proposing this stronger wording to emphasize the importance of this rule:
"OSC might request project files at any time. Failure to produce it upon request will lead to disqualification, and may lead to a lengthier ban from the competition, at the organiser's discretion" [1]
The next 15 votes will decide. You must have entered in a previous OSC:
Reply with your vote. Those who agree say aye...Those opposed, say no.
1. (See full context against the old rule, see highlighted here: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/rules)
I would like to hold a public vote on a rule. Currently, the rule states that if a participant refuses to send project files after a co-organizer requests them, they are disqualified. However, there is significant nuance involved, and each situation should be considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, a participant might outright refuse, make excuses, or even ignore messages. In such cases, disqualification alone may not be enough. Upholding the integrity of these challenges is essential. I am proposing this stronger wording to emphasize the importance of this rule:
"OSC might request project files at any time. Failure to produce it upon request will lead to disqualification, and may lead to a lengthier ban from the competition, at the organiser's discretion" [1]
The next 15 votes will decide. You must have entered in a previous OSC:
Reply with your vote. Those who agree say aye...Those opposed, say no.
1. (See full context against the old rule, see highlighted here: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/rules)
One Synth Challenge: https://sites.google.com/site/kvrosc/about
-
neverbeeninariot neverbeeninariot https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=350084
- KVRian
- 1077 posts since 3 Feb, 2015 from UK
- KVRAF
- 2228 posts since 29 Sep, 2011
Aye
- KVRist
- 415 posts since 28 Nov, 2013 from Germany
Aye
Passed 303 posts. Next stop: 808.
-
- KVRian
- 552 posts since 22 Jun, 2019
Aye
- KVRist
- 175 posts since 10 Jan, 2018
