Why isn't Melda more popular?
-
- KVRist
- 148 posts since 29 Apr, 2019
Here's 2 great examples of why I love Melda. I use(d) Izotopes vocalsynth and ozone. They gave great sounds "easily". But when I wanted to adjust and tweak. They had insufficient features for "adjustability". Also, I didn't learn any reusable ideas from them.
I now use MXXX by 'copying' most of the ozone generated chain. Then I can adjust down to the finest detail. I make it sound the same, then I go from there. Now I don't use Ozone except as a recommendation.
Same for vocalsynth, it sounded great, but poor "adjustability". So I emulated it in MXXX and now I can construct the same sounds but with much better modulation, oscilator configs, unison, compression, etc. etc. etc.
I am also converting my Amplitube sounds to Melda amp/cabs. That will take some time as I await presets and learn how to do that.
Melda helps me learn more basic concepts. Reusable concepts. That's very hard at first (I bought MAutoDynEQ and didn't use it for a year!) but reusable foundational DSP concepts are at the heart of Melda. That's why he pumps out so many plugins and kinda scoffs at all the "emulations". He approaches the problem as an engineer.
Ultimately Melda is highly functional and does not spend time "sounding like the classics" (or looking like them). This is inline with my opinion.
I want more love for the Mac tho'. I still get crashes and the response is typically "because of Apple" which is not the case. The crashes are somewhere in a caching layer and there is a race condition.
I now use MXXX by 'copying' most of the ozone generated chain. Then I can adjust down to the finest detail. I make it sound the same, then I go from there. Now I don't use Ozone except as a recommendation.
Same for vocalsynth, it sounded great, but poor "adjustability". So I emulated it in MXXX and now I can construct the same sounds but with much better modulation, oscilator configs, unison, compression, etc. etc. etc.
I am also converting my Amplitube sounds to Melda amp/cabs. That will take some time as I await presets and learn how to do that.
Melda helps me learn more basic concepts. Reusable concepts. That's very hard at first (I bought MAutoDynEQ and didn't use it for a year!) but reusable foundational DSP concepts are at the heart of Melda. That's why he pumps out so many plugins and kinda scoffs at all the "emulations". He approaches the problem as an engineer.
Ultimately Melda is highly functional and does not spend time "sounding like the classics" (or looking like them). This is inline with my opinion.
I want more love for the Mac tho'. I still get crashes and the response is typically "because of Apple" which is not the case. The crashes are somewhere in a caching layer and there is a race condition.
-
- KVRist
- 75 posts since 22 Nov, 2020
They respond with that? Really?magmagwa wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:18 pm
I want more love for the Mac tho'. I still get crashes and the response is typically "because of Apple" which is not the case.
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 12 May, 2019
This is half the reason I got melda - to keep learning the fundamentals of digital audio. A big neural connection I made was how Melda implements modular 'synth-like' control signals into the range as, of course, 'modulators'. It was just drawing that parallel between the two worlds that opened up by brain some.magmagwa wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:18 pm Here's 2 great examples of why I love Melda. I use(d) Izotopes vocalsynth and ozone. They gave great sounds "easily". But when I wanted to adjust and tweak. They had insufficient features for "adjustability". Also, I didn't learn any reusable ideas from them.
I now use MXXX by 'copying' most of the ozone generated chain. Then I can adjust down to the finest detail. I make it sound the same, then I go from there. Now I don't use Ozone except as a recommendation.
Same for vocalsynth, it sounded great, but poor "adjustability". So I emulated it in MXXX and now I can construct the same sounds but with much better modulation, oscilator configs, unison, compression, etc. etc. etc.
I am also converting my Amplitube sounds to Melda amp/cabs. That will take some time as I await presets and learn how to do that.
Melda helps me learn more basic concepts. Reusable concepts. That's very hard at first (I bought MAutoDynEQ and didn't use it for a year!) but reusable foundational DSP concepts are at the heart of Melda. That's why he pumps out so many plugins and kinda scoffs at all the "emulations". He approaches the problem as an engineer.
Ultimately Melda is highly functional and does not spend time "sounding like the classics" (or looking like them). This is inline with my opinion.
I want more love for the Mac tho'. I still get crashes and the response is typically "because of Apple" which is not the case. The crashes are somewhere in a caching layer and there is a race condition.
It really blurs the line between generator and effect.
-
- KVRist
- 49 posts since 26 Jan, 2007
I'm not much of a presets person though I get it why good ones are so important to so many people.Tricky-Loops wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:19 am There's another thing that could be improved - the presets. They have strange names and deliver even more strange sounds but you rarely find any really good sounding presets.
As such I've not spent a ton of time auditioning presets except in MFilter, and the wah presets in particular. They are quite good imo. Not dead ringer emulations of existing gear (which I have anyway) but are great sounding presets in their own right. And you have the options to trigger it any way Melda supports which is pretty much any way imaginable.
Crazy good sounds out of this plugin. Plus its on sale right now for those thinking about it....
-
- Banned
- 334 posts since 11 Jan, 2015
honest question: who cares? use it if you like it, don't use it if you hate it. don't bother why others don't share your opinion, you will not change them and it doesn't matter for your projects at all
-
- KVRAF
- 35691 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I'm always puzzled why common sense posts like these get a thumbs down.frizzbee wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:22 pm honest question: who cares? use it if you like it, don't use it if you hate it. don't bother why others don't share your opinion, you will not change them and it doesn't matter for your projects at all
Bad times for common sense I guess.
- KVRAF
- 5391 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
-
- KVRist
- 307 posts since 18 May, 2020
Maybe because it misses to answer the question about Melda's popularity and doesn't add anything to the content? Just a thought....chk071 wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:39 pmI'm always puzzled why common sense posts like these get a thumbs down.frizzbee wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:22 pm honest question: who cares? use it if you like it, don't use it if you hate it. don't bother why others don't share your opinion, you will not change them and it doesn't matter for your projects at all
Bad times for common sense I guess.![]()
Last chance
-
- KVRAF
- 35691 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Why would it when the question is pointless in the first place? 1. Who says that Melda is unpopular? 2. Who cares if it is? There's a lot of stuff out there which isn't that popular, and still kicks ass.
I only own the MFreeFXBundle, but, I really don't know anything comparably in terms of extent, coverage and features.
I guess the only person who could say if Melda's plugins are unpopular is Vojtech himself, as he knows how many copies he's selling, and maybe has an insight on general sales amounts of comparable plugins or plugins suites. Anything else is speculative and pointless. But, hey, when did that ever stop a discussion here?
I only own the MFreeFXBundle, but, I really don't know anything comparably in terms of extent, coverage and features.
I guess the only person who could say if Melda's plugins are unpopular is Vojtech himself, as he knows how many copies he's selling, and maybe has an insight on general sales amounts of comparable plugins or plugins suites. Anything else is speculative and pointless. But, hey, when did that ever stop a discussion here?
- KVRian
- 965 posts since 12 May, 2019
I think it's a valid inquiry.
If we never wondered what was going on outside camp, we'd all still be living in Africa.
By looking into this, we can possibly uncover how to make what we have better.
Or, possibly, we're all deluded and should stick with the developers that spend the most on advertising - though I doubt it.
If we never wondered what was going on outside camp, we'd all still be living in Africa.
By looking into this, we can possibly uncover how to make what we have better.
Or, possibly, we're all deluded and should stick with the developers that spend the most on advertising - though I doubt it.
-
- KVRist
- 75 posts since 22 Nov, 2020
chk071 wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 9:50 pm Why would it when the question is pointless in the first place? 1. Who says that Melda is unpopular? 2. Who cares if it is? There's a lot of stuff out there which isn't that popular, and still kicks ass.
I only own the MFreeFXBundle, but, I really don't know anything comparably in terms of extent, coverage and features.
I guess the only person who could say if Melda's plugins are unpopular is Vojtech himself, as he knows how many copies he's selling, and maybe has an insight on general sales amounts of comparable plugins or plugins suites. Anything else is speculative and pointless. But, hey, when did that ever stop a discussion here?![]()

-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 8089 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
When an estimated half your buying audience you spend years alienating, you cannot be surprised at your sales numbers.
This is potentially not going to play out well for them at all. If early reports of the "worst" M1 Apple Silicon macs Apple will release are anything to go by, there will be even more people using macs in the next couple years.
- KVRAF
- 18500 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I think it comes down to two things. First, it’s not just the UI that is different, but his entire approach is different. This puts a lot of people off, but I think it’s great. It’s almost like he’s never used a hardware synth in his life and just thought, “well what should a software synth be?”
The second thing is, there’s a trend now to sound “analog” and his synths and effects don’t really sound analog. I don’t personally care, but I can see why other plugins get more attention these days.
The second thing is, there’s a trend now to sound “analog” and his synths and effects don’t really sound analog. I don’t personally care, but I can see why other plugins get more attention these days.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
