its not just semantics and tone, you're pouncing on ron because of his reputation. the first thing you do is call him a retard, and then you relate it all to his previous postings. so what if you know him to be a troll? it appears that's all you think of him.
big freakin' deal. he hadn't said anything to insult you, he was expressing his opinion (he doesn't think it's a big deal and that it will be implemented eventually). you think it's a big deal and you disagree with his comments. of course you do, you felt the need to start up a whole new thread. why, i would have responded the same if i'd have gotten into the thread sooner, what with the extent at which the discussion has already reached in the LAST THREAD ABOUT IT.who freaking cares dude? sheez! just wait theyll put it in some upgrade. DANG!
you called him a retard, and you had drawn on history. that is not a response to an opposing opinion. it was an undue attack and the more you defend yourself about it the more pathetic you make yourself out to be. what have I got to gain from all this? nothing. i'm just concerned about this directed aggression, and yet it is YOU who claim to be concerned about keeping the peace.
forgot there that there were two other people in this argument! 
sorry clueless, i wasn't implying that at all.. i was using that as an example to state the opposite 
