Can't be arsed to vote for any of the two.
Neither one would ever make me even THINK about switching to 96, not even for a test.
As with all the other recent threads, my personal bottomline is: Learn to mix first, when you mastered this, let's talk about better equipment, higher samplerates and whatever...
Ok new Poll test one is44k one is 96k which one is best
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
Spaceman Sounds Spaceman Sounds https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56830
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 580 posts since 3 Feb, 2005
I do know how to mix though 
I write and produce for a living...and do pretty well ut ouf it latly. 
I write and produce for a living...and do pretty well ut ouf it latly. -
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
OK, why not let us hear some of your productions?Spaceman Sounds wrote:I do know how to mix though
Maybe in 44.1 and 96 - to compare in an actual music context.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRer
- 10 posts since 6 Jan, 2005 from Berlin, Germany
Very intersting topic.
I still have not made up my mind wich part sounded better. As I´m struggeling with my computer resources I´m not going to switch to a higher samplerate soon. Maybe the differences are not as big as a lot of people suggest. It would be great to have a few more and different Sounds and sequences to compare.
So thanks again for this topic, spaceman.
Keep it up.
I still have not made up my mind wich part sounded better. As I´m struggeling with my computer resources I´m not going to switch to a higher samplerate soon. Maybe the differences are not as big as a lot of people suggest. It would be great to have a few more and different Sounds and sequences to compare.
So thanks again for this topic, spaceman.
Keep it up.
- deliberately uncool -
-
- KVRist
- 461 posts since 12 Jan, 2003 from Kyoto
Well I voted for the one that sounded like it had "higher quality" to me. Whether it "sounds better" (if you see the distinction) is impossible to say. Frankly, I think the muddier one would get used more in actual music.
-
Spaceman Sounds Spaceman Sounds https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=56830
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 580 posts since 3 Feb, 2005
No, not another poll!! 
Somebody stop him 
-
- KVRer
- 6 posts since 25 Sep, 2005
Hi, new here.
I´m surprised, it´s a debate at all. If you focus on the "hiss" part of the sound in that patch the differences are incredible.
Wheter one is better or worse I think allways depend on musical ussage, anything goes.
Also my impression is the image is more detailed in the second example, or maybe I should say more 3D. but the hiss !! it goes down in volume a lot.
Question, in Nuendo you need to switch the proyect to 96, or simply an audio mixdown to 96 will do it ?
best
I´m surprised, it´s a debate at all. If you focus on the "hiss" part of the sound in that patch the differences are incredible.
Wheter one is better or worse I think allways depend on musical ussage, anything goes.
Also my impression is the image is more detailed in the second example, or maybe I should say more 3D. but the hiss !! it goes down in volume a lot.
Question, in Nuendo you need to switch the proyect to 96, or simply an audio mixdown to 96 will do it ?
best
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753 - KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
I record at teh 8 bit 22khz.
-
- Banned
- 5089 posts since 12 Jun, 2001 from Wusik Dot Com