Whatever he meant by this exact wording, I am not certain but isn't the behavior the same in ACE? Hmm... I didn't notice a difference in the way it has affected Cutoff. I mean, if I set KF to full then it tracks the keyboard...in a positive modulation from the lowest octave to the highesthakey wrote:The current manual says:As in all other u-he synthesizers, key follow pivots around E3
Bazille Public Beta (updated to 2370)
-
- KVRian
- 787 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from sweden
Last edited by snigelx on Thu Jun 05, 2014 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 26929 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
More Bazille - recorded in a cliff dwelling out in the high desert of New Mexico
http://draigathar.org/sounds/B41.mp3
http://draigathar.org/sounds/B41.mp3
-
- KVRian
- 787 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from sweden
pdxindy wrote:More Bazille - recorded in a cliff dwelling out in the high desert of New Mexico![]()
http://draigathar.org/sounds/B41.mp3
- KVRian
- 921 posts since 14 Oct, 2002 from Sweden
- KVRAF
- 4196 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
-
Tom Drinkwater Tom Drinkwater https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=283090
- KVRist
- 90 posts since 26 Jun, 2012
can someone explain why modulating the divide value that already exists is not a good way of doing this?justin3am wrote:Urs had mentioned in the past that if the sequencer rate is modulatable, it can go out of sync even when modulation is not applied. I seem to remember this beeing the case with Zebra's MSEGs. I think it has to do with whether the sequencer is following the host's song position or if it is run by an internal clock (which it would have to be, to support modulation). Correct me if I'm wrong.
I always thought that a clock input would be a elegant solution. The sequencer would normally run based on the song position but if you connect a signal to the clock input, it would then ignore the song position with the understanding that the sequence could eventually run out of sync. Admittedly, my understanding of this stuff is very basic.
the speed would then be modulatable, but when the seq is set to sync it would also be affected by any tempo changes in the host session. sounds ideal to me.... and when it isn't set to sync there isn't a problem anyway.
- KVRAF
- 26929 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
ideal yes... but that does not mean the math pencils out in the practical sense... currently, without modulation, try holding a note down that is using the sequencer and record it in sync... then look at the waveform and you will see it goes out of sync with your daw timeline fairly quickly.Tom Drinkwater wrote:can someone explain why modulating the divide value that already exists is not a good way of doing this?justin3am wrote:Urs had mentioned in the past that if the sequencer rate is modulatable, it can go out of sync even when modulation is not applied. I seem to remember this beeing the case with Zebra's MSEGs. I think it has to do with whether the sequencer is following the host's song position or if it is run by an internal clock (which it would have to be, to support modulation). Correct me if I'm wrong.
I always thought that a clock input would be a elegant solution. The sequencer would normally run based on the song position but if you connect a signal to the clock input, it would then ignore the song position with the understanding that the sequence could eventually run out of sync. Admittedly, my understanding of this stuff is very basic.
the speed would then be modulatable, but when the seq is set to sync it would also be affected by any tempo changes in the host session. sounds ideal to me.... and when it isn't set to sync there isn't a problem anyway.
-
- KVRian
- 787 posts since 15 Nov, 2005 from sweden
The way I view keyfollow is like a rubberband placed around a central note... as the tracking is increased then the "rubberband" is stretched both ways away from the central note... in the case of cutoff tracking, then the value of cutoff is distributed between the lowest and highest MIDI note depending on the current keyfollow setting...so yes I do actually see what is meant by pivot. This is the way I have understood it at least.. It makes sense for me. And depending on manufacturer the cutoff values may be distributed at certain preconfigured intervals like quarter tone..semitone.. etc depending on keyfollow/tracking setting
-
- KVRian
- 855 posts since 3 Mar, 2009
Bug in v2370:
Attached patch.
Look what the sequencer is doing with the first 4 LEDs. That's not normal.
To get to this behaviour i assigned CV2 modulation to Gain of Filter3. Set this to None and the sequencer is back to normal
Attached patch.
Look what the sequencer is doing with the first 4 LEDs. That's not normal.
To get to this behaviour i assigned CV2 modulation to Gain of Filter3. Set this to None and the sequencer is back to normal
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Tom Drinkwater Tom Drinkwater https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=283090
- KVRist
- 90 posts since 26 Jun, 2012
um no I don't see that, it seems to stay in sync fine. when the seq is set to sync, it stays in sync, as far as I can see, over a 2 minute period I don't see any drift...pdxindy wrote:
ideal yes... but that does not mean the math pencils out in the practical sense... currently, without modulation, try holding a note down that is using the sequencer and record it in sync... then look at the waveform and you will see it goes out of sync with your daw timeline fairly quickly.
how far out over what time scale are you talking about? am I looking for the wrong thing?
-
- KVRer
- 10 posts since 16 Nov, 2012
Yes, it is done with Bazille and a convolution reverb ...
Can be improved a lot !
http://algosyn.com/music/synth/bazille/PipeOrgan1.mp3
http://algosyn.com/music/synth/bazille/PipeOrgan1.h2p
Enjoy !
Olivier
Can be improved a lot !
http://algosyn.com/music/synth/bazille/PipeOrgan1.mp3
http://algosyn.com/music/synth/bazille/PipeOrgan1.h2p
Enjoy !
Olivier
-
Tom Drinkwater Tom Drinkwater https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=283090
- KVRist
- 90 posts since 26 Jun, 2012
a really great feature for bazille would be a mute function. I initially thought a per module mute, but then I thought, better still, what about double click or modifier-of-yr-choice-click on an output (or input) to mute it, then the cable from it would turn grey. no extra GUI items needed then.
it would be really helpful when working out what is doing what without disconnecting or losing settings.
a signal input to the scope to monitor from any output would also be great!
it would be really helpful when working out what is doing what without disconnecting or losing settings.
a signal input to the scope to monitor from any output would also be great!
- KVRAF
- 3471 posts since 19 Aug, 2008 from USA-lien In the 8th Dimention


