+1olikana wrote:an analog eq requires 0dff. there no ifs and buts. it's all bout filters after all.
that's why software eqs suck balls (compared to analog eqs). been saying it for ages...
needs to be done at some point.
u-he @ Musikmesse 2013
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1994 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839 - KVRAF
- 1914 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
I'm sorry, I didn't have any intention to start it. Just saw couple'o reapers and that's it. But DAW war is like Spanish Inquisition -- nobody expect it. 
Btw, 'spanish inquisition' is a good name for distortion and decimation plugin, if u-he have an intention to make one.
Btw, 'spanish inquisition' is a good name for distortion and decimation plugin, if u-he have an intention to make one.
Murderous duck!
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30213 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
We've been working on a so-called "Multi Scene Filter" for Zebra3 which is a superset of equalisers, resonators, filterbanks and modal synthesis bodies. Our testcase renders 2000+ filters on a single core, and they're all 0df. They do however cover the linear case only. Which - for that application - is well enough, as well as for transparent equalisers.olikana wrote:an analog eq requires 0dff. there no ifs and buts. it's all bout filters after all.
that's why software eqs suck balls (compared to analog eqs). been saying it for ages...
don't know how feasible cpu wise is a bunch of filters running in 0dff and on different channles ...but needs to be done at some point.
My hope is that we can use this technology and put it into Filterscape and Uhbik at some point.
-
- KVRian
- 777 posts since 13 Dec, 2011
Urs wrote:We've been working on a so-called "Multi Scene Filter" for Zebra3 which is a superset of equalisers, resonators, filterbanks and modal synthesis bodies. Our testcase renders 2000+ filters on a single core, and they're all 0df. They do however cover the linear case only. Which - for that application - is well enough, as well as for transparent equalisers.olikana wrote:an analog eq requires 0dff. there no ifs and buts. it's all bout filters after all.
that's why software eqs suck balls (compared to analog eqs). been saying it for ages...
don't know how feasible cpu wise is a bunch of filters running in 0dff and on different channles ...but needs to be done at some point.
My hope is that we can use this technology and put it into Filterscape and Uhbik at some point.
"The future's so bright, I gotta wear shades."
-
- KVRAF
- 1888 posts since 13 Aug, 2011 from Berlin
It was really cool that you've been with us!ThomasHelzle wrote:And a big thanks to Urs and the team for having me
These were 7 days to remember for sure!
Cheers,
Tom
-
- KVRian
- 1276 posts since 30 Apr, 2004 from Louisville, KY
The newest version uses the U-He logo:Fritze wrote:But I am biased! Noice one!!! Thank you!!!bftucker wrote:On a less serious note (not that I am biased)
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30213 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
A final wrap up (Saturday & Sunday) in pictures:
Claes showing me the modular synth in Bitwig
Coffee with Jim Heintz and Andreas Schneider
Single Malt with Stephan M. Bernsee at Zynaptiq
Time to take things apart...
... and stuff it into the van
Last chance to check mails
It was a great week
Claes showing me the modular synth in Bitwig
Coffee with Jim Heintz and Andreas Schneider
Single Malt with Stephan M. Bernsee at Zynaptiq
Time to take things apart...
... and stuff it into the van
Last chance to check mails
It was a great week
-
- KVRAF
- 24426 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Does modular synth in Bitwig do 0dff? 
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170 - KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
I really hope U-He synths will get per-note automation support in BitWig Studio by the way!
It would still be cool to have VST3 VST expression (or however it is called) support, but that seems to be hard to impement.
Claes mentioned in another video that the BitWig Studio per-note automation is based on simple sysex messages and should be easier to implement iirc
Cheers
Dennis
It would still be cool to have VST3 VST expression (or however it is called) support, but that seems to be hard to impement.
Claes mentioned in another video that the BitWig Studio per-note automation is based on simple sysex messages and should be easier to implement iirc
Cheers
Dennis
-
- KVRAF
- 6542 posts since 9 Dec, 2008 from Berlin
Yeah, he showed me the per note automation and it's very well implemented it seems.
ATM they have the VST 2.x support mostly working and think about VST3 exactly for this kind of stuff. It seems they had per not automation before VST3 was even available...
I personally was very impressed by Bitwig actually.
Looks like Ableton Live 15...
Cheers,
Tom
ATM they have the VST 2.x support mostly working and think about VST3 exactly for this kind of stuff. It seems they had per not automation before VST3 was even available...
I personally was very impressed by Bitwig actually.
Looks like Ableton Live 15...
Cheers,
Tom
"Out beyond the ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there." · Rumi
UrbanFlow.art · Instagram · YouTube
UrbanFlow.art · Instagram · YouTube
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30213 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30213 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRian
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
me toodjanthonyw wrote:Null tests don't lie.
Good call, something we can all agree on. Lets move on.chilly7 wrote:p.s.
But i agree, it is a Uhe MusikMesse thread so no offtopic anymore. If sombody want to continue this dessusion they can creat a thread in a propiat forum location.
Still really looking forward to Satin and the Diva update.