Waves GTR vs Native Instruments Guitar Rig 2
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Well then, you should learn how to read properly. He's was pretty blatantly encouraging people to try out the warez version...ghost666 wrote:Jeez... the time it takes for people to get offended over nothing on KvR these days is less than my latency!
edited
So the discussion of the possible existence of warez is offensive now?
![]()
Chill out people.
Anyway, it's against the forum rules and he should be more diligent about following them if he wants to be a part of the community. I'm amazed that this thread hasn't been locked or deleted yet. It's always disrupting when a legitimate thread, that can have useful information, gets locked because some jackass posts this type of crap. And this isn't the first time he's endorsed warez on this forum either.dc12 wrote:edited
Extended FAQ & Rules
4. Members are asked to respect the copyright of other users, sites, media, etc. Users linking to, asking for information about, or blatantly bragging about using, warez, crackz, pirated sample content, re-printing material without permission, etc. will result in your post being edited / deleted, and you may be issued with a warning and / or a ban.
-
- KVRian
- 1107 posts since 31 Oct, 2002 from the high desert
Except Amplitube 2 doesn't. Have they even hinted at a price for the foot controller yet?EKen wrote: The Amplitube 2 and GR 2 both come with nice footpedals.
GR2,however,has a full demo!!
-
- KVRist
- 39 posts since 21 Aug, 2005
yep,i was talking abot existence of cracked GTR,but for someone here is obviously hard to understand.ghost666 wrote:Jeez... the time it takes for people to get offended over nothing on KvR these days is less than my latency!
I didn't read dc12's post as promoting warez - rather stating a fact - or at least a fact as he sees it.
He didn't state where to get the said cracks... but simply said that they existed.
So the discussion of the possible existence of warez is offensive now?
![]()
Chill out people.
i really didn't mean to offend anyone.
My apologize
-
- KVRist
- 471 posts since 18 Mar, 2004
LOL. What a joke.bduffy wrote: Oh yeah, good idea getting on his bad side. Next I suggest you take on Kriminal, Bones or Nuffink.
Are they gonna textually abuse him?
These three idiots gets told here more than often.
Whats you point, really?
History is full of two kinds of people.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35506 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Try re-reading the terms and conditions of KVR some time...ghost666 wrote: So the discussion of the possible existence of warez is offensive now?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- vvvvvvv
- 2595 posts since 24 Oct, 2000 from skelmersdale, west lancs, uk
whyterabbyt 
ExactlyTry re-reading the terms and conditions of KVR some time...
Member 12, Studio One Pro 7, VPS Avenger, Kontakt 8, Spitfire, Sonible, Baby Audio, CableGuys. Recent best buy - EZ Drummer 3 with Bandmate
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
It's obviously hard someone here to admit to a mistake without backpedaling.dc12 wrote:yep,i was talking abot existence of cracked GTR,but for someone here is obviously hard to understand.
i really didn't mean to offend anyone.
My apologize
You wrote...
Sorry, but I read it as you encouraging people to try out the warez version. Do you really need to use gleeful little smiles just to draw attention to the mere existence of warez?. What purpose does "talking about the existence of warez" serve anyway? Does it really contribute to the discussion at hand? If this was a thread about the uselessness of some form of copy protection, it would be excusable. But it was a thread about comparisons between two products. In the context of this thread you were encouraging people to try out the two plugins, in question, via the warez version. Give me a break, you know damned well what your intent was. Stop trying to weasel your way out of it.dc12 wrote:waves GTR was cracked yesterday,so anyone can try it,guitar rig 2 also
I personally don't give a shit if people use warez, I just hate it when interesting threads get locked because people are too ignorant to follow the forum's rules. This has happened all together way too often around here and I'm sick of it.
Last edited by John Vulich on Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Particularly easy since I just posted them a few massages back.whyterabbyt wrote:Try re-reading the terms and conditions of KVR some time...ghost666 wrote: So the discussion of the possible existence of warez is offensive now?
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
The bad thing about the whole PACE dilemma (amd yes, it *has* been a true dilemma, no idea how well things are working today) is that apparently a lot of legit Waves users (even a few of their testers, as it seems) were like "buy the original, use the crack". This *seems* to make a strong point for all the "warez aren't allways all that bad" folks. But it only *seems*.
If PACE was/is that bad, why not stay away from them entirely? That's what I did. Sure, bad luck for those that bought a package allready, even worse if you can't find a proper replacement - but these days at least the latter is no issue anymore.
And staying away from them entirely, regardless whether you'll be using a legit or hacked version, thus not spreading the "Waves is good" word at all, is the *only* way that might teach them one day.
Even if my deepest sympathies go to those with the "PACE f**ked it up" machines, their copy protection should be no reason to get into warez but should rather make stay away from them and get over it.
If PACE was/is that bad, why not stay away from them entirely? That's what I did. Sure, bad luck for those that bought a package allready, even worse if you can't find a proper replacement - but these days at least the latter is no issue anymore.
And staying away from them entirely, regardless whether you'll be using a legit or hacked version, thus not spreading the "Waves is good" word at all, is the *only* way that might teach them one day.
Even if my deepest sympathies go to those with the "PACE f**ked it up" machines, their copy protection should be no reason to get into warez but should rather make stay away from them and get over it.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRist
- 245 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
Actually seeing as there is no way to demo the product in question without buying a PACE ilok *OR* trying the warez version I think his contribution was entirely relevant. He didn't blag (which would go against the terms and conditions) and he didn't post links. One could interpret the smiley which you flagged up as a breach, as being a cheeky grin of realisation at what a farce copy protection has become to the point of not only hurting legitimate users but now also *potential* legitimate users!!John Vulich wrote:What purpose does "talking about the existence of warez" serve anyway? Does it really contribute to the discussion at hand?
Its never as black and white as people here wish to believe, and censorship is never the answer to protecting people of weak moral fibre - which one doesn't always have to be to "sample" warez software. If anything, it is the denial of knowledge which creates such biased view points. The situation is worsened by people parting with large sums creating a bias on their part against other people choosing to be more careful about theirs. As such, in light of Waves' demo and pricing policies I feel such comments were not pro-piracy. They were pro-consumer power. If the moderators disagree then ban my account, but at least have the dignity to leave this post up so others may freely make their own minds up on this most contentious of grey area issues!!
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
The absence of a demo running without an iLok again is no justification to use the warezed version. It's a perfect justification for anything along the "Waves can rot in hell" lines though. Just don't use their stuff and be done.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
You do have a point, however those users that fear using a Pace protected app on their systems are unlikely to ever buy the product anyway. So what's the point in demoing, via a warez version, if they have no intention of really buying it.Tren wrote:Actually seeing as there is no way to demo the product in question without buying a PACE ilok *OR* trying the warez version I think his contribution was entirely relevant.John Vulich wrote:What purpose does "talking about the existence of warez" serve anyway? Does it really contribute to the discussion at hand?
Quite frankly, your logic leaves a bit to be desired.
-
- Banned
- 1149 posts since 7 Mar, 2004
i know legit paying customers of a lot of software, leaving their dongles and pace elsewhere than their PCs.
I think the guy drawing attention here to cracked software wasn´t thinking rigth at the moment he did it, i know he meant no arm bacause he said: "TRY IT", not use it or get it. anyway it looked bad as farting at the first date with a major babe.
I think the guy drawing attention here to cracked software wasn´t thinking rigth at the moment he did it, i know he meant no arm bacause he said: "TRY IT", not use it or get it. anyway it looked bad as farting at the first date with a major babe.
-
- KVRist
- 245 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
So they can use it like most legitimate Waves users who are computer literate do; keep the version that has had the copyprotection stripped on their computer and keep the bought disc and ilok in the cupboard...John Vulich wrote:So what's the point in demoing, via a warez version, if they have no intention of really buying it.
of course i doubt this would ever hold up in a court of law...but i'd hope it never would have to...at least not quite but who knows where the world is going...

