Would you be able to supply the 300L settings for that file?living sounds wrote:I take bets on this being impossible.There's already a file with a static and rather unsuited reverb availible (check the IR vs algorithmic thread). I'll provide a better example soon.
Warp69 wrote:Would you be able to supply the 300L settings for that file?living sounds wrote:I take bets on this being impossible.
Remember that you cant turn off modulation for the following algorithms even with a value of 0 for spin :
Random Hall
Random Ambience
Cheers
Ok thats strange, because thats not possible on the other high-end reverbs from Lexicon.......living sounds wrote:I will provide the settings. Turning of the modulation IS actually possible for all algorithms, as the file that was sent through the hardware almost cancels out with a file that was subjected to convolution - the remaining difference is, apart from noise and DC offset generated by the lexicon unit, the slight difference in quality as described above.
Oh, very interresting and cheeringliving sounds wrote:I will provide the settings. Turning of the modulation IS actually possible for all algorithms, as the file that was sent through the hardware almost cancels out with a file that was subjected to convolution - the remaining difference is, apart from noise and DC offset generated by the lexicon unit, the slight difference in quality as described above.
Warp69 wrote:Ok thats strange, because thats not possible on the other high-end reverbs from Lexicon.......living sounds wrote:I will provide the settings. Turning of the modulation IS actually possible for all algorithms, as the file that was sent through the hardware almost cancels out with a file that was subjected to convolution - the remaining difference is, apart from noise and DC offset generated by the lexicon unit, the slight difference in quality as described above.
Awesome! Thanks for these. Will start experimenting right away.living sounds wrote:So, I put up a little song that has got loads of reverb in it. The archive contains a short mix, the individual tracks and the two reverb busses (wet). Try to mach this with any reverb plugin(combination), so the song sounds as lively, transparent and has the same (insanly high) reverb level.
Settings are:
Lex1: Contem Plate, get the exact settings from the manual at Lexiconpro.com
Lex2: Random Ambience, Size 29,8m, Rev Time 1.5s, L Delay 107, R Delay 0, Diffusion 46, Spin 40, Wnader 22,8m, Rev Lv1 - 9dB, Rolloff 8.9k
Get it here: www.scherer.de/Download/300test2.rar
Cheers,
Gregor
I have only done a fast plate test - first CSR then 300. www.relab.dk/CSR300_TEST.wavliving sounds wrote:So, I put up a little song that has got loads of reverb in it. The archive contains a short mix, the individual tracks and the two reverb busses (wet). Try to mach this with any reverb plugin(combination), so the song sounds as lively, transparent and has the same (insanly high) reverb level.
Settings are:
Lex1: Contem Plate, get the exact settings from the manual at Lexiconpro.com
Lex2: Random Ambience, Size 29,8m, Rev Time 1.5s, L Delay 107, R Delay 0, Diffusion 46, Spin 40, Wnader 22,8m, Rev Lv1 - 9dB, Rolloff 8.9k
Get it here: www.scherer.de/Download/300test2.rar
Cheers,
Gregor
Hmmm....sounds like the same verb throughout to me but then again, I'm a loud guitar player...maybe my ears are shot...Warp69 wrote:I have only done a fast plate test - first CSR then 300. www.relab.dk/CSR300_TEST.wavliving sounds wrote:So, I put up a little song that has got loads of reverb in it. The archive contains a short mix, the individual tracks and the two reverb busses (wet). Try to mach this with any reverb plugin(combination), so the song sounds as lively, transparent and has the same (insanly high) reverb level.
Settings are:
Lex1: Contem Plate, get the exact settings from the manual at Lexiconpro.com
Lex2: Random Ambience, Size 29,8m, Rev Time 1.5s, L Delay 107, R Delay 0, Diffusion 46, Spin 40, Wnader 22,8m, Rev Lv1 - 9dB, Rolloff 8.9k
Get it here: www.scherer.de/Download/300test2.rar
Cheers,
Gregor
Cheers
.Warp69 wrote:I have only done a fast plate test - first CSR then 300. www.relab.dk/CSR300_TEST.wavliving sounds wrote:......
Cheers
Yup...that's the one...it sounds very consistent to me that's all...I could only detect a slight low end difference but like I said, my ears might be fired...LiteOn wrote:Hi Wap69,
.Warp69 wrote:I have only done a fast plate test - first CSR then 300. www.relab.dk/CSR300_TEST.wavliving sounds wrote:......
Cheers
Sure, that it's two different reverbs (beerkeek, did you mean that file above?)? And to me it does sound like wet only. Which isn't bad at all.
cheers,
LiteOn
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
