-> LUNA must be EASYbambooman wrote:"Like LUNA Now"
why "kill+destroy" luna's original concept 3-steps before the finish line?
and trying to make something totally different out of it?
the new idea is like:
teasing poor little luna with a voodoo puppet imho*sniff*
there are already enough projects around who try to copy the idea of XT.
like maize studio, plus i've found at least 5x more at sourceforge.net and other places.
at the present stage,
i would simply make a sub/fork-project out of it
but keeping the main focus on getting luna done,
the way it was meant to be...
before doing anything else with it.
-> I fully agree that Tryout 1 is not good enough. It was launched as a conceptual question. A big Thanks to Everyone sharing thoughts here! Without You I'm Nothing!
-> It's because i'm not yet 100% convinced of the current concept (LUNA PR7b) that LUNA is still in Pre-Release. (and because of some minor issues which need finetuning).
And so it's better to put this basic conceptual question now than later.
-> Be sure, i do like the lovely easiness of the classic rack system and will not throw that away as nothing.
-> The powerful benefits of being 'modular' cannot be denied. But there is a typical aspect with modular systems: they're easy for complex projects, but they're complex for easy projects
-> LUNA IS modular inside, and so it's all about the User Interface
-> MUTOOLS does NOT want to copy ext.
-> Last but not least: MUTOOLS is working on a hybrid system (classic + modular = 1). And the works are progressing well. So i'm already curious for your critical feedback on LUNA Modular Tryout 2. To be there next week..?
Cheers,
Jo

