Oh for f**ks sake, it's an internet forum, not a dissertation. Shitty is my opinion, if you can't see that then maybe go outside and play for a little while, get some sunshine.recursive one wrote:So well, "shitty" gets a new meaning. It doesn't anymore mean "bad", now it means "everything which is not an accurate model of an analog". Thank you for clarifying this.ghettosynth wrote: Here shitty is referring to the ability of the filter to be an accurate model of an analog filter.
Hmmm i Don't need more synths or do i? Opinions on Hive?!:...:::
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
-
- KVRian
- 1185 posts since 27 Apr, 2016
I normally sweep and think that sounds good, that sounds a bit odd, that sounds sweet, that sounds a bit aliasy up there, hmm why is it like the volume is ducking when I sweep, those kind things are typical, not much logic in it.
When it's good I smile usually. If I smile it usually makes it into my favourites.
When it's good I smile usually. If I smile it usually makes it into my favourites.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
I'm sorry, was it not clear? That would be a waste of "my" time. Feel free to post whatever you like. I don't really care if you disagree. I'm not losing any sleep because you can't hear the effects of crappy filters.fluffy_little_something wrote:Well, you seem to define what things should and shouldn't sound like. So why not post an audio demonstrating the latter, or both actually?ghettosynth wrote:Why would I waste my time to convince you of anything? If you can't tell the difference then it doesn't matter to you, right?fluffy_little_something wrote: I am not into sweeps, would you mind posting an audio of such a shitty Sylenth1 filter sweep just so that I know what shitty sounds like?
Maybe I could tell the difference and would agree with you, Maybe not...
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
As I expected, just empty words...ghettosynth wrote:I'm sorry, was it not clear? That would be a waste of "my" time. Feel free to post whatever you like. I don't really care if you disagree. I'm not losing any sleep because you can't hear the effects of crappy filters.
During the time you wasted writing your posts, you could easily have recorded a shitty sweep...
Last edited by fluffy_little_something on Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
The more rapidly you sweep the more obvious are the artifacts, especially when the resonance is high.Synthman2000 wrote:I normally sweep and think that sounds good, that sounds a bit odd, that sounds sweet, that sounds a bit aliasy up there, hmm why is it like the volume is ducking when I sweep, those kind things are typical, not much logic in it.
When it's good I smile usually. If I smile it usually makes it into my favourites.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
You're not getting it, it's not about how much time it would take, it's that I don't care what "you" need to be convinced. Go convince yourself, or not, I don't give a shit. If you want to argue about things, go find someone else to argue with.fluffy_little_something wrote:As I expected, just empty words...ghettosynth wrote:I'm sorry, was it not clear? That would be a waste of "my" time. Feel free to post whatever you like. I don't really care if you disagree. I'm not losing any sleep because you can't hear the effects of crappy filters.
During the time you wasted writing your posts, you could easily have recorded a sweep...
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
I think Sylenth's filters are kind of special. If you compare them with something like Diva, the difference is obvious, but I really love their liquid squelchy qualities, indeed, really good for psytrance (among other things).
ARP 303 SAW!!!111

ARP 303 SAW!!!111
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
If you don't want to argue about it and support your claims, you are just dumping your opinion here, which is as subjective and biased as anybody else's...ghettosynth wrote:You're not getting it, it's not about how much time it would take, it's that I don't care what "you" need to be convinced. Go convince yourself, or not, I don't give a shit. If you want to argue about things, go find someone else to argue with.
Now that we have clarified that, fine with me
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I think what ghetto is trying to say, and maybe not using the best words to say it, is this.
Sylenth1's filters do not accurate emulate an analog filter, at least in a technical sense. I am sure this is easy enough to prove with various tools. So for the purpose of technical accuracy, he calls Sylenth1's filters sh*tty. Maybe a better term would simply be inacurate as an analog model.
How good or bad that filter sounds to each individual's ears is purely subjective. Some people like that inaccurate emulation while others do not.
Trying to equate "quality" to "pleasing to the ear" when it comes to music is an exercise in futility.
Sylenth1's filters do not accurate emulate an analog filter, at least in a technical sense. I am sure this is easy enough to prove with various tools. So for the purpose of technical accuracy, he calls Sylenth1's filters sh*tty. Maybe a better term would simply be inacurate as an analog model.
How good or bad that filter sounds to each individual's ears is purely subjective. Some people like that inaccurate emulation while others do not.
Trying to equate "quality" to "pleasing to the ear" when it comes to music is an exercise in futility.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Sorry to pick on this, but, meh, dude.ghettosynth wrote:As I said, some people prefer the sound of shitty filters.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
I didn't say that I didn't want to argue, I said that I didn't want to argue with "you."fluffy_little_something wrote:If you don't want to argue about it and support your claims, you are just dumping your opinion here, which is as subjective and biased as anybody else's...ghettosynth wrote:You're not getting it, it's not about how much time it would take, it's that I don't care what "you" need to be convinced. Go convince yourself, or not, I don't give a shit. If you want to argue about things, go find someone else to argue with.
Now that we have clarified that, fine with me
There is fact in my comments and there is opinion. Shitty as a pejorative is just my opinion. That Sylenth's filter is old and inaccurate and will distort on rapid sweeps is fact.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Then don't, because you're just going to waste your time. I'm not engaging the ZDF deniers today.chk071 wrote:Sorry to pick on this, but, meh, dude.ghettosynth wrote:As I said, some people prefer the sound of shitty filters.![]()
-
- KVRAF
- 4751 posts since 22 Nov, 2012
Just so every one knows, Hives filters are not the most analog either. They reproduce very, very well, and are very punchy, but the "analog" comes from artificial distortions added to the filter. This does make it sound more analog in the end signal. Hive is all about the juicy distortions added.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Why, what's wrong with "me"?ghettosynth wrote:I didn't say that I didn't want to argue, I said that I didn't want to argue with "you."
There is fact in my comments and there is opinion. Shitty as a pejorative is just my opinion. That Sylenth's filter is old and inaccurate and will distort on rapid sweeps is fact.
I am quite open to being convinced of something, but of course not with words.
Old, yes, but inaccurate? Inaccurate implies a deviation from something ideal or original.
Are there mathematical flaws in Sylenth1's filter algorithm? How do you know, do you have access to the code?
