like I said, quality was a poor choice of words and I'm sorry...dont know what more I can say?Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote:Hink, Obi is correct. We don't cut corners in our DSP models. We have always aimed for the top rung on the ladder. We make models for people who want the best available, with no compromises.
However... we DO offer lower quality DSP modes - note the HI, MID, ECO settings - so we can provide the best modeling solutions at each DAW level.
More of a deal is being made about this in my case then it should, people are taking offense to the way I prefer to use AT and that's just plain messed up. Do you really care if I do not track with AT? Everyone has their wishes when new software comes out, not all of us get them...but I do not think you have heard me say anything bad about AT except I had other wishes. So what? I still think AT3 is great, it didn't get worse and I liked it before
I guess I'm just hopelessly dreaming of the day where where latency is measured .001ms
