in there already, why not not a third one.
The greatest mono synth of all time.
btw, I need your advice about ZebraliciousHZ
I have often wondered if there were some very interesting theoretical synth designs that never got built, due to expense or complexity.Urs wrote: I'm using every free time of my vacation (sic!) to work on modeling an analogue filter prototype that wasn't ever used in any existing synth. This one is going beyond the known bases. Not sure yet if it'll sound any good though
Doesn't Howard have a Synthi AKS?Urs wrote:
We still have no Prophet 5, Chroma, ARP 2600, Synthi, Wasp. We also don't have access to an ARP 2500, we only had the opportunity to borrow a filter module (which we didn't). Also, the opportunity to borrow a Synthex is gone for now.:
Sounds goodUrs wrote: I'm using every free time of my vacation (sic!) to work on modeling an analogue filter prototype that wasn't ever used in any existing synth. This one is going beyond the known bases. Not sure yet if it'll sound any good though
Nope… he had one but sold it ages ago.fmr wrote:Doesn't Howard have a Synthi AKS?Urs wrote:
We still have no Prophet 5, Chroma, ARP 2600, Synthi, Wasp. We also don't have access to an ARP 2500, we only had the opportunity to borrow a filter module (which we didn't). Also, the opportunity to borrow a Synthex is gone for now.:
Maybe.Sounds goodUrs wrote: I'm using every free time of my vacation (sic!) to work on modeling an analogue filter prototype that wasn't ever used in any existing synth. This one is going beyond the known bases. Not sure yet if it'll sound any good thoughCan you tell us more? Something more elaborate, in the vein of Xpander?
We might be able to work out access to a 2500, but you'd have to spend your vacations working not in Australia. Are working trips tax deductible in Germany?Urs wrote: We also don't have access to an ARP 2500, we only had the opportunity to borrow a filter module (which we didn't).
Hehe, a small part of my holidays is a few business meetings. That's certainly tax deductable.groundhum wrote:We might be able to work out access to a 2500, but you'd have to spend your vacations working not in Australia. Are working trips tax deductible in Germany?Urs wrote: We also don't have access to an ARP 2500, we only had the opportunity to borrow a filter module (which we didn't).
Urs wrote:The things that are listed are those that the poster knew we had access to, at that time.fluffy_little_something wrote:I always liked the Rhodes Chroma sound, but it is not listed
We still have no Prophet 5, Chroma, ARP 2600, Synthi, Wasp. We also don't have access to an ARP 2500, we only had the opportunity to borrow a filter module (which we didn't). Also, the opportunity to borrow a Synthex is gone for now.
I'm using every free time of my vacation (sic!) to work on modeling an analogue filter prototype that wasn't ever used in any existing synth. This one is going beyond the known bases. Not sure yet if it'll sound any good though
Because different sounding filters have the biggest impact on Diva without watering the concept down.fluffy_little_something wrote:Why that obsession with filters?
New synth concepts are fine, but the topic would be somewhat strange within a thread about new components for Diva.fluffy_little_something wrote:Would be more interesting to come up with a new synth concept
That's a dual lane synth… the Korg 700s or 770 would rather fit DivaSoulState wrote:Korg MAXIKORG!
IMHO, right now the priority should go to the oscillator. We (I, at least) need something different, that could approach the sound of the Oberheim. And one that allows mixing waves AND control the volume of the different sources, including noise (ideally, we should even address noise modulation separately, to allow for using a different envelope to it - this would be great for attack transients).hakey wrote:That said, my vote still goes for adding the Polymoog resonator module.
Fits the paradigm, would add a distinctive flavour, and (iirc) u-he already have one coded.
While volume control and balance + noise on the oscillators is important, I also feel the biggest problem with OB emulation in Diva is the envelopes. The OB envelopes and how they affect the filter and amp have a characteristic curve which is very difficult if not impossible to emulate with Diva's existing envelopes. However I mentioned this before and Urs commented that he doesn't want to make Diva an OB "emulator"; I'm not sure why since Diva already emulates a few classic standards already...fmr wrote:IMHO, right now the priority should go to the oscillator. We (I, at least) need something different, that could approach the sound of the Oberheim. And one that allows mixing waves AND control the volume of the different sources, including noise (ideally, we should even address noise modulation separately, to allow for using a different envelope to it - this would be great for attack transients).
For the moment, a switch that reduces the volume of the pulse wave to ballance it with the other waves in the Dual VCO would be very welcome (or a back panel that allow us to control the relative volumes). My NSH 2 cents
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026