Survey = What FX do YOU want most in 2006?

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion

What kind of FX do you want most in 2006?

Poll ended at Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:52 am

Delay/Echo
12
7%
Distortion / Lo-Fi
13
7%
Dynamics (Compressor / Limiter)
11
6%
EQ
6
3%
Exciter / Enhancer
6
3%
Filter
6
3%
Mastering / Mixing
12
7%
Modulation (Flanger / Phaser / Chorus / Etc.)
6
3%
Multi-FX Unit
15
8%
Noise Removal
8
4%
Pitch Shifting / Correction
11
6%
Reverb
21
12%
Spectral FX
29
16%
Vocoder
8
4%
Other (Please Specify)
17
9%
 
Total votes: 181

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Step Sequenced Multi-FX. Yeah, along the same lines as dBlue Glitch, but with more in-depth contols for the induvidual effects. Or, as can be set up in something like e-xt, user definable VST effect slots for each step.

Post

I'd like some VST fx that is good!

Post

here's what I want.

a stereo delay with independent channel control over depth, width and length. then I want each stereo channel to have a series of independently configurable effects (bitcrusher, tremelo, distortion, reverse delay, high/low/bandpass filters). on top of this I want to be able to set the wet/dry of the channel effects independently on each the original signal and the delayed signal so that the original signal doesn't have any of the distortion/bitcrushing/etc.

if you could wrap all that up in classy GUI with minimal CPU usage and get me a copy for free, I'd be happy as shitballs in the summertime.
"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together...." -Carl Zwanzig

Post

A suite of individual tools that each does one thing, and does it efficiently (cpu) and well (sound). Basic things, like a compressor, a gate, a delay, a ring mod, etc. All the things that I'd want as inserts/sends when I was tracking/mixing with a small enough CPU/memory footprint that I could use multiple instances to track/mix in my DAW of choice.
I know this is the sort of thing that most people use the built in effects for (so do I), but I'd like different sonic options without having to load a larger more robust effect that is just overkill. Loading camelSpace (which I love) for an eighth-note delay on a guitar just doesn't make sense.

That being said, I'd also like something along the lines of TC Electronics Harmonizer.
"I drank what?"
Socrates

Post

jkotz wrote:A suite of individual tools that each does one thing, and does it efficiently (cpu) and well (sound). Basic things, like a compressor, a gate, a delay, a ring mod, etc. All the things that I'd want as inserts/sends when I was tracking/mixing with a small enough CPU/memory footprint that I could use multiple instances to track/mix in my DAW of choice.
You might be interested in xhipeffects.

Post

I'm about to put out something that'll make 14 people very happy.

Post

Multi-FX Unit :hug:

Post

arke wrote:Multi-FX Unit :hug:
With a cherry on top! :love:








No, not a XXX cherry...

Post

i SO could use a true ringmod, that actually multiplies 2 diff inputs, rather than multiplying with an internal waveform (like all of them ive found so far, does.)
this would be useful in eXT etc. :)

Post

JackDark wrote:
arke wrote:Multi-FX Unit :hug:
With a cherry on top! :love:
Yay!
JackDark wrote: No, not a XXX cherry...
Booo... :(

Theres gotta be a scantily clad anime girl on it though. Otherwise it wouldnt be JackDark :)

Post

JackDark no do that for the buyware.

JackDark no do that too much more in the future either.

JackDark no like being predictable.

JackDark need sleep now.

JackDark love everybody.

Post

Well ok for the buyware it wouldn't be a good idea :) but for the freebies, it makes arke happz

Post

whats about a peace vst ?

Post

kritikon wrote:Still waiting for a decent native algorithm reverb that doesn't use PACE :roll:
www.artsacoustic.com :D

Post

Bounced due to a few days left on the poll system.

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”