When they put strong beats on top ?cron wrote:Yeah, this is the kicker. We can pull out examples of glitch/rhythm based stuff and retrofit them into what we're hearing today quite easily, but the fact remains that this stuff had no cultural penetration at all. Dance music was always and still is culture driven, so asking who made whatever sound first is a bit of a nothing. The real question is when did people first start dancing to it.ghettosynth wrote:First, I think you have really good taste in music. Second, so I like that, it's quite interesting, but virtually no-one has heard it, so it cannot really be viewed as influential to everyone. We each borrow from what is available to us and take what works and leave the rest. I've had this record since I was a kid, given to me by someone at some point, don't ask me who or when, it's far older than your example, early 60s I believe.cron wrote:I always like pulling this one out during such conversations. It's a bit of a stretch to call it dance music because it wasn't really made in any sort of dance music context (and probably not made for dancing at all), but I still think there are very few contemporary minimal dancefloors it wouldn't wreck.vurt wrote:perhaps coil?Davias wrote:The examples were very interesting to hear, but it is not dance yet... so who made the proto-idm, the early electronic glitch music (with beats or rhythms) then ?
or oval?
There are parts of the album that have proto-elements of glitch. Notice the evolution to some extent, your example is a nice little beat driven piece. My example is almost purely academic. One had to be serious about writing electronic music. The only access to equipment at that time was through the university.
So once we have James Brown, Giorgio Morroder, Kraftwerk, and maybe one or two other people, it's all over. Everything house has been invented!
Of course that's not true and these people built on their influences as well. You can't just argue that technology did all the work, both of these works were highly influenced by the available technology. It's not just a thing, it's about using the thing to create music. A piano is just technology, only a lazy musician doesn't hammer the strings directly with his knuckles.
Thanks for all the music posted here, hearing really interesting things too ^^