LinPlug Spectral public beta for pc out
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
Well, from my two to three hours with it so far, it's quite obvious that it can do a lot. It's very capable of bread and butter, but then I probably wouldn't use it for that (it would almost seem like a waste).Neon Breath wrote:@ those you beta-tried it: since I can't try it yet (osx here), what type of music/sounds do you think Spectral is the most suited? Is it realty a bread and butter synth or you see it succeeding more at a particular type? Hopefully, it's going to excel at pads, drones and other atmospheric sounds!
Pads, drones? Definitely. It's easy to add a lot of subtle movement; keep in mind that in addition to being able to modulate the symmetry and phase of the wave, you've got AM/FM/PM routing between the four oscillators and filters. It really is a bit mind-boggling.
-
- KVRAF
- 4371 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
ariston wrote:
Pads, drones? Definitely. It's easy to add a lot of subtle movement; keep in mind that in addition to being able to modulate the symmetry and phase of the wave, you've got AM/FM/PM routing between the four oscillators and filters. It really is a bit mind-boggling.
Really can't wait to give it a try! Cheers guys for the input.
-
Bronto Scorpio Bronto Scorpio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98170
- KVRAF
- 5546 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from Wiesmoor, Germany
I didn't really have time to really check this out yet, so I only recorded one simple thing so far: FM Testpdxindy wrote:Let's hear some audio!
I'm just checking out the capabilities as a 4OP FM synth there, so it isn't really representative of the synth!
Cheers
Dennis
-
- KVRist
- 289 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from just a little to the left
The way it is set up is turned around from what I'm used to, but once you get the flow of modulation right, it does work quite well (see the "Danger Zone" patch for an example of 4-op FM capability, as well as nostalgiaBronto Scorpio wrote:I didn't really have time to really check this out yet, so I only recorded one simple thing so far: FM Testpdxindy wrote:Let's hear some audio!
I'm just checking out the capabilities as a 4OP FM synth there, so it isn't really representative of the synth!
Cheers
Dennis
As I said, a deep rabbit hole
STV
-
- KVRist
- 430 posts since 1 May, 2012
Is anyone else having issues with projects not loading with the correct sounds? In Sonar X3a, saved a project with 6 instances of Spectral, came back to it and about 3 of the instances had changed to other user presets in my bank. Or is this a beta limitation?
- KVRAF
- 2488 posts since 2 Dec, 2004 from Sydney, Australia
A 90s-like demo tune using only Linplug's Spectral (v0.9.7.2 beta), No external effects other than Spectral's, Percussions from D16's Drumazon, No track Eq/compression except limiter on master bus.
https://soundcloud.com/dellodee/linplug ... a-90s-demo
https://soundcloud.com/dellodee/linplug ... a-90s-demo
- KVRAF
- 2930 posts since 29 May, 2009 from New Zealand
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- Banned
- 6787 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
so peter linsener took the whole concept of ni razor and it's gui ( added some more flexibilitty ....possibilty to create own filter curves ) and is getting away with it ( altough the steepnes of the lp filter is also adjustable on razor but not as flexible ?
great ..
good sytnh
Originality 0/10
great ..
good sytnh
Originality 0/10
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
- KVRAF
- 2930 posts since 29 May, 2009 from New Zealand
- KVRist
- 176 posts since 27 Mar, 2008 from below Pittsburgh
Spectral and Razor are both additive synthesizers. That's about it, except Razor is a subset of Reactor.
If anything Spectral is an Alpha. That is, a super Alpha. Follow this progression: Alpha (additive oscillators), to Albino (also additive with "analogue" type oscillators with more parameter choices and features) to Morphox (additive oscillators with a true morphing capability). And now, Spectral.
You can download the manuals to all these plug-in's, including Razor and Reactor, and compare for yourself. That way your head won't seem as just another thunder mug.
Read! Don't fantasize.
If anything Spectral is an Alpha. That is, a super Alpha. Follow this progression: Alpha (additive oscillators), to Albino (also additive with "analogue" type oscillators with more parameter choices and features) to Morphox (additive oscillators with a true morphing capability). And now, Spectral.
You can download the manuals to all these plug-in's, including Razor and Reactor, and compare for yourself. That way your head won't seem as just another thunder mug.
Read! Don't fantasize.
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
Maybe somebody with better experience with Morphox has some opinion about Spectral?
I play since some time with the Spectral Beta and the Morphox Demo and cannot achieve the same nice sound from Morphox with Spectral.
Morphox has eg. a 16" SawTooth and 32" Dark Pulse 1 where I can easy set 16" or 32" with one click. With Spectral I must use some of this combined waveforms (where I cannot find a similar sounding wave) and must open the wave editor to pitch some waveform differently.
I play since some time with the Spectral Beta and the Morphox Demo and cannot achieve the same nice sound from Morphox with Spectral.
Morphox has eg. a 16" SawTooth and 32" Dark Pulse 1 where I can easy set 16" or 32" with one click. With Spectral I must use some of this combined waveforms (where I cannot find a similar sounding wave) and must open the wave editor to pitch some waveform differently.
| Links-
- KVRAF
- 4371 posts since 15 Sep, 2010
I own Razor, and tried beta Spectral and they are very different beasts. Didn't find them similar in term of workflow. Both are additive but very different sound at the end. Razor has features Spectral doesn't have, viceversa.gentleclockdivider wrote:so peter linsener took the whole concept of ni razor and it's gui ( added some more flexibilitty ....possibilty to create own filter curves ) and is getting away with it ( altough the steepnes of the lp filter is also adjustable on razor but not as flexible ?
great ..
good sytnh
Originality 0/10
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- Banned
- 6787 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
I have reaktor and played with razor ..even zebra has basic spectral morphing ..
In both synths spectre and razor ...Everything is done with a sine bank or let's( an I gues zebra to for the spectral filtering and osc effects ) say a huge amount of partials ... , even the filters ...which just re arranges the partials of the osc...so there is no actual filtering going on ..anyway ..
Yes spectre has a lot more options , including the ability to draw your own filters which razor can't ...in razor all the filters are templates made by the programmer for the sine bank ( lp , phaser like , comb ....etc all sn...
so yeah spectre wins there ....
Ohh yeah the gui is verry slow on my computer ..and consumes a lot of cpu ( only the gui ) anyone else have this problem ?
In both synths spectre and razor ...Everything is done with a sine bank or let's( an I gues zebra to for the spectral filtering and osc effects ) say a huge amount of partials ... , even the filters ...which just re arranges the partials of the osc...so there is no actual filtering going on ..anyway ..
Yes spectre has a lot more options , including the ability to draw your own filters which razor can't ...in razor all the filters are templates made by the programmer for the sine bank ( lp , phaser like , comb ....etc all sn...
so yeah spectre wins there ....
Ohh yeah the gui is verry slow on my computer ..and consumes a lot of cpu ( only the gui ) anyone else have this problem ?
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
