The choir/vocals sounds amazing
mux patches
- KVRian
- 1352 posts since 17 Aug, 2012 from Old Zealand
Great demo track Taron
The choir/vocals sounds amazing
The choir/vocals sounds amazing
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
THANKS, sbj! Those vocals are about to get even better...as in A LOT better. I'm so amazed!
But, Jo, I've got a little bit of a weird thing going on after replacing a sound with its own newer version. No meta parameters or modules have changed in the MUX, except that I've edited internal values for one module (the beautiful new note to modulation conversion!).
Somehow parameters recorded via the front panel won't record or playback recordings anymore!? Their names in the pattern modulation are replaced by "?".
After then altering the front panel and trying to make new recordings with now meta parameters ended up showing different names in the pattern like "gain" for the first meta parameter of the mux, which I had called "wobble". But it also wouldn't play back those parameter recordings, while they were freshly made.
Not sure if that had always been the case, but I just wanted to give you a heads-up that there's something fishy?!
But, Jo, I've got a little bit of a weird thing going on after replacing a sound with its own newer version. No meta parameters or modules have changed in the MUX, except that I've edited internal values for one module (the beautiful new note to modulation conversion!).
Somehow parameters recorded via the front panel won't record or playback recordings anymore!? Their names in the pattern modulation are replaced by "?".
After then altering the front panel and trying to make new recordings with now meta parameters ended up showing different names in the pattern like "gain" for the first meta parameter of the mux, which I had called "wobble". But it also wouldn't play back those parameter recordings, while they were freshly made.
Not sure if that had always been the case, but I just wanted to give you a heads-up that there's something fishy?!
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
I should add that this fishiness is not even all to easy to recreate?! Hmmmm.... guess it could just be some weird freak accident of sorts...
...so: nevermind for now until I encounter this again!
- KVRist
- 409 posts since 26 Jul, 2010 from Germany
Great sound, Taron, really great sound. So clear and real.
JR
JR
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
Thanks, JR!
I've just updated Matty and the Choir and updated the consolidated song file:
demo 01
I'm so amazed right now, really. If you use a few versions of Matty, pan them and offset the wave index a little, you can get a most amazing choir, really. I might have a look at elegant ways to delay midi events properly for some kind of automation of that. If that would work, this could become even more stunning, really. But I'm thrilled either way!
...so fun!
I've just updated Matty and the Choir and updated the consolidated song file:
demo 01
I'm so amazed right now, really. If you use a few versions of Matty, pan them and offset the wave index a little, you can get a most amazing choir, really. I might have a look at elegant ways to delay midi events properly for some kind of automation of that. If that would work, this could become even more stunning, really. But I'm thrilled either way!
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
Here's another new one, but soon I will start posting properly...
Harmute v1.0
(created in MuLab 6.4.24)
It's kind of a flute, kind of a harmonium, kind of an organ, actually...it's somewhere in that realm. It can sound like a pretty convincing flute, though.
Hit it hard and you'll get a little jodel, too!
Harmute v1.0
(created in MuLab 6.4.24)
It's kind of a flute, kind of a harmonium, kind of an organ, actually...it's somewhere in that realm. It can sound like a pretty convincing flute, though.
Hit it hard and you'll get a little jodel, too!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
Here's a little demo song with 3 new patches... whereby I had a concerning scratching when modulating lfo amplitude, especially while feeding into any volume.
Also, I had a much prettier vst reverb on it, but this one kind of gets part of the spirit of it.
Anyway, here's that lazy sunday "smoothy"...
Also, I had a much prettier vst reverb on it, but this one kind of gets part of the spirit of it.
Anyway, here's that lazy sunday "smoothy"...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
- KVRAF
- 13865 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Nice track! Lovely flute sound! Contructive feedback: I would try to get the drums sounds a bit better, especially the snare. But maybe that's only me? Thanks for sharing your wonderful creations Taron 
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
I'm all for some good advice, Jo! I'd love to hear what you had in mind, of course! 
THANKS most definitely!
I wonder, if it's something that my front panel parameters could handle, or if you are thinking about even deeper changes in its character?
Good thing is, the drumset is nowhere near filled up, meaning there's plenty of room for at least a second snare (third, actually), if it was about a totally different sound.
THANKS most definitely!
I wonder, if it's something that my front panel parameters could handle, or if you are thinking about even deeper changes in its character?
Good thing is, the drumset is nowhere near filled up, meaning there's plenty of room for at least a second snare (third, actually), if it was about a totally different sound.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
How about this version?
I've changed the reverb of the drums to match the main send reverb (too bad I can't, yet, send from within a mux to an "external" rack). I've tuned the snare, tighten kick and snare a bit. I think, it does give it more quality already, too.
Of course, I don't know, if that goes towards what you were thinking of, but it's good to get a nice push for sure! Thanks for that already!
Don't stop pushing, though!!!
I've changed the reverb of the drums to match the main send reverb (too bad I can't, yet, send from within a mux to an "external" rack). I've tuned the snare, tighten kick and snare a bit. I think, it does give it more quality already, too.
Of course, I don't know, if that goes towards what you were thinking of, but it's good to get a nice push for sure! Thanks for that already!
Don't stop pushing, though!!!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 13865 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
Cool! Makes me happy! But I'm also still curious what your ideal might sound like!
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3207 posts since 17 Apr, 2010 from Slovenia
Here's a curious MUX. I've made a little "room" effect, actually to place a sound, rather than to give reverb. It's almost like an early reflection model, but it is so tight that it literally can just offset the sound source in space, including a sense of in front or behind you. It can also work as special effect, of course, doing all sorts of wacky stuff, but with a bit of careful adjusting you can get quite amazing stereo fields!
I call it: Tight Room (mux effect)
Parameters:
I call it: Tight Room (mux effect)
Parameters:
- input mono: allows you to dial the original sounds stereo down to mono
- room pan: this applies offsets to the delay times of left and right, not to their volumes
- delay | feedback | dampen: it's really where the magic happens! Be gentle with those!
- filter | Q: this is a bandwidth filter, felt like the most useful one in that context
- dry/wet: ok, maybe this is where the magic happens?
- modulation: modulates delay times
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
