KVR Audio

robenestobenz · Post by **robenestobenz** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:53 am

aquar wrote:all I can say is I am not much of a geek, I don't spend all my time hooked into a spectrum analyzer zooming in and salivating at a pretty picture.

That wouldn't be a geek, that'd be a moron. Funnily enough, it's often MUSICIANS that are fussed about sound quality. Be it guitar tone or a synth patch.

aquar wrote:All I am interested in is making tunes and beats and the current batch of vsti's I use including several free ones are up to snuff for my purposes. In other words I am not a sonic snob unlike your goodself

Right... my most used synth is KarmaFX by the way, so I'm definitely not a sonic snob. You're an ignoranamus who thinks nice sounds make for pretty spectrums though.

DuX · Post by **DuX** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:44 am

I can't understand all this fuss about the GUI. I'd use Xhip even if it had no GUI at all

.

Listen, don't look! You'll discover a whole different dimension of sound and how plugins *really* sound. Ears can be deceived by the pretty GUI or the ugly GUI for that matter...

Cheers!

bobsled · Post by **bobsled** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:05 pm

aquar, seems that Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:39 pm was too long ago for you to remember, so I'll just remind you.

aquar, stop talking out of your ass dude

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... start=1125

I've read some of your previous post history, so I know you're not a total dick or anything. But why do you gotta be like this?

Why do folks just have to mess with these xhip threads?

aquar · Post by **aquar** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:25 pm

bobsled wrote:
I've read some of your previous post history, so I know you're not a total dick or anything. But why do you gotta be like this?
Why do folks just have to mess with these xhip threads?

I am not hijacking the xhip thread if that is what you are suggesting.?
If you want me to be a sycophant I am afraid no can do

Besides its a public forum and I am entitled to my opinion.

Honestly I wouldn't really worry about it much more...like I said I've officially sacked xhip as my freeware test synth and moved onto pastures new.
Oatmeal is the new kid in town now!

Mix Mouse · Post by **Mix Mouse** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:38 pm

Doesn't seem like hijacking at all. The guys comments seem right in line with this thread title. Maybe he should pay special attention to the word please though . . .

Xhip would gain a lot of mileage with me as well with a stable 1.0 release.

bobsled · Post by **bobsled** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:44 pm

Well, maybe I'm a little quick on the trigger this mornin'. If so, I apologize for shooting the messenger.

inzeenir · Post by **inzeenir** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:56 pm

+1 for 1.0 release.

audio booger · Post by **audio booger** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:50 am

Is this one good for supersaw sounds?

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:18 am

"+1 for 1.0 release."

http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/xhip.v1.dll

fgimian · Post by **fgimian** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:26 am

aciddose, is there any way to add a stereo width parameter to unison to get true stereo sounds ?

Love your synth!
Fots

GHOST19 · Post by **GHOST19** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:28 am

xhip v1 !

Must be time to download it... and try it in a fex months

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:48 am

"is there any way to add a stereo width parameter to unison to get true stereo sounds"

no, but there will be soon with event routing / unison diffusion.

you can currently though use an lfo to pan with the sample/hold or random waveforms at a very low rate. use a high rate until you get the panning you want then set the rate to zero.

btw the version 1.0 thing i just renamed the latest version to 1.0. if all you want is a 1.0 version then that is all you've got to do. if you however want other features, you'll have to wait

vista · Post by **vista** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:04 am

aciddose wrote: ...
btw the version 1.0 thing i just renamed the latest version to 1.0.
...

hi aciddose,

thanks alot for your efforts !

btw: xhip.v1 seems to be adxhip.0.6.12.0 and not adxhip.0.6.13.5

vista

MaliceX · Post by **MaliceX** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:22 am

That's how it should be. It is the latest stable release. Any other version is by definition, an unstable release candidate.

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:31 am

well technically revisions can be stable or unstable, they're just minor versions which dont actually count as releases. the last alpha was considered stable although i've fixed quite a few bugs since that. if you're referring to the fact it is a revision of an alpha version however, yes you're completely correct, all alpha versions should be considered unstable. you're a bit incorrect about 0.6.12.0 then though, since it too is an alpha version

anyway, hopefully i can get some more work in. i've really just been doing so many other things lately and spending most of my free time working on hardware stuff. there is at most one afternoon/evening of work on xhip before we get to the "patch format stable" part, and maybe a couple more before the other stuff gets implemented. things really just fall into place once you make space for them, so that is all i have to do at the moment.

it'll be really nice to have a 'finished' beta that i can post news for, on kvr and other sites. gsoto i hope you're prepared when people cry about the gui and i say 'gsoto did it'

XHip--Please finish your synth!!