TONEPORT VST is AVAILABLE!!!!
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12517 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
I dunno, $200 bucks seems reasonable to me. I look at it like this. I bought my Guitarport and the model packs long before I knew about VST support (minus the Bass model pack), and have gotten some damn good mileage out of them. Now, GearboxVST comes out, and the upgrade is only $200? Not cheap, but still cheaper than going out and buying AT2 brand new and hoping the Syncrosoft dongle works for me, while I already know my Guitarport (dongle) works. So basically, I get the good ampsim plug-in I've been craving, with sounds that I know are proven, and it's about half of what AT2 costs. Oh, and I already own the hardware. Yup, I personally ain't gonna complain.
-
- KVRAF
- 3163 posts since 22 Dec, 2004
Has anyone tested the plugins at 96Khz? Is there a noticeable difference in the sound? On my XT Live there is some aliasing with high notes. I wonder if running the plugin at a higher sampling rate would cure this.
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 27 Oct, 2005
I was already familiar with VST's when I bought the Toneport. I was frankly surprised that there was no way to use it as a plugin since it was purely software to begin with. They never promised a free upgrade to offer this capability, but having to pay 100% of what I initially paid over again to get what should have been there to begin with is a bit rich for me.
But, lots of folks seem to be happy with it and thats what matters. It doesn't seem like a good value to me ($200(toneport)+$200(model packs)+$200(vst)), but that's just me.
But, lots of folks seem to be happy with it and thats what matters. It doesn't seem like a good value to me ($200(toneport)+$200(model packs)+$200(vst)), but that's just me.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
I'm with you chris, I just still cannot find any benefits for me. I do not really do much re-amping (okay I have never re-amped), so I just do not see what spending 200 bux will do for me. But that's not to say it isn't great for others, I do like the gearbox itself over the line 6 edit as an interface.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 27 Oct, 2005
I'd like to be able to adjust the tones after they are recorded, but to some degree, this can be done already by recording without the cabinets and adding cabinets in realtime via impulses. I've got ten times as many cabinets in impulse form as Line 6 provides (including the line 6 ones). You wouldn't want to change a recorded track from a small tweed to a recto anyway because you play those amps differently anyway.
I don't mean to discourage anyone who has bought the VST plugin... I hope they enjoy it. Its too rich for me.
I don't mean to discourage anyone who has bought the VST plugin... I hope they enjoy it. Its too rich for me.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 27 Oct, 2005
search the forum for "annex.ax84.com" and you'll find links to the ones that I've made. Others came from noisevault.
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 27 Oct, 2005
-
- KVRist
- 56 posts since 26 Jan, 2006 from Chicago, IL
I pointed out earlier that the 200$ upgrade is consistent with the Gold/Silver standalone packages. But I do agree that the whole VST thing seems to be overpriced for both sides. I didn't think it would be that "hard" to convert front-end recording processing to VST effect processing. But I guess thats just how it is.
Although I STILL think of Line 6 as saving a crapload of money. It would've costed me tens of thousands of dollars to do what Line 6 emulates (getting cabs, amps, setting up room, mics, etc).
Although I STILL think of Line 6 as saving a crapload of money. It would've costed me tens of thousands of dollars to do what Line 6 emulates (getting cabs, amps, setting up room, mics, etc).
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 27 Oct, 2005
:) But you never would have done that (spent tens of thousands of dollars)... You'd have bought a few great sounding amps and been out a few thousand dollars, tops. The only reasons you have bunches of amp models is (a) you can and (b) quantity making up for quality
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
don't get me wrong, I have POD 2.0 and xt live and I swear by them. But I do not see where in my workflow a vst would improve things...Heckxx wrote:I pointed out earlier that the 200$ upgrade is consistent with the Gold/Silver standalone packages. But I do agree that the whole VST thing seems to be overpriced for both sides. I didn't think it would be that "hard" to convert front-end recording processing to VST effect processing. But I guess thats just how it is.
Although I STILL think of Line 6 as saving a crapload of money. It would've costed me tens of thousands of dollars to do what Line 6 emulates (getting cabs, amps, setting up room, mics, etc).
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRist
- 88 posts since 26 Jul, 2003 from Los Angeles
I get a file doesn't exist warning when I attempted to DL. I'd really like to see how well this idea works...
George
Tech support via net or in person in the Los Angeles area. http://www.georgetechguru.com
Author: VTC Logic 6, CSi Logic 6 Starter, and CSi Plug-ins V2
Author: VTC Logic 6, CSi Logic 6 Starter, and CSi Plug-ins V2
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 27 Oct, 2005
oops. should be fixed directly.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada

