Software Hoarding

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

BONES wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:13 am
keyman_sam wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:40 pmOne problem with software, I find, is that it's a bit harder to sell it once you use it. i.e. there's always the danger that one of my old projects used it and I'm worried it might not open.
You've got it arse-backwards. Once you sell a hardware synth, it's gone forever. One of the biggest attraction of working ITB for me was that I'd be able to keep using softsynths forever and, therefore, all my old songs would keep working forever. OTOH, every time I bought a new synth, I'd spend months trying to recreate the old instruments parts with the new synth. If I forgot about a song at that time, chances were I wouldn't be able to play it ever again. Every song we have ever worked on ITB, all the way back to 2002, is still accessible on my current PC. They all still load and play pretty much perfectly. The most I have to do is relocate a few samples.
I don't need a bunch of plugins, it's been collecting dust. HW demands your attention.
No it doesn't. I find it the easiest thing in the world to ignore. I know I have four hardware synths somewhere on my boat but, right now, I'm not exactly sure where two of them are and I realised a couple of weeks ago that one that I thought was in storage was actually buried in the back of a cupboard, here on the boat. I'll probably end up throwing a couple of them out, because they'll rot away here for years before I can be bothered doing anything with them, and giving the others away, assuming they still work.
Easier to sell too as the value doesn't depreciate that much.
Don't be f**king ridiculous. You'll lose hundreds, if not thousands, when you sell hardware. OTOH, you can just stop installing software you no longer use and not be anywhere near as out of pocket. And hardware can be much, much harder to unload. I've been trying to sell a Novation Ultranova and an Elektron Analog Keys, both in very good condition, for well over a year now. They've been sitting in a second-hand shop for most of that time and I'm going to take a bath on both of them. It won't be so bad with the Ultranova because I got that really cheaply, second-hand, but I had to spend $300 on repairs to the AK before I could even think about selling it. When (if) I sell them both, I will lose more money than I have spent on software in the last 20 years. Seriously, the soft bag I bought for the AK cost more than Studio One but it won't add $1 to the resale price.
markello wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 6:43 pm Some folks compare making music to being a mechanic? lol
But nothing like being a mechanic.
You clearly have no idea what "being a mechanic" involves. If you've done both things, the parallels are obvious - technical skill, creative solutions to the problems that come up, fabricating something beautiful from a steaming pile of shit and a huge sense of achievement and pride when the job is done.I'd rather spend a day behind the wheel of my car than behind a synth keyboard or computer monitor. It's at least as engaging and, at the end of the day, more enjoyable and more rewarding.

If we didn't play live, I'd definitely spend way more time working on cars than I'd spend working on music. The enjoyment I get from music is far more fleeting - you finish a song and it's sounds great but if you're not getting up on stage and performing it, the thrill fades very quickly and you move onto the next thing, trying to get that little buzz again. OTOH, when you finish working on your car, that's when the fun really starts and it won't normally fade for years, if ever. If I had to choose, I'd take cars every time.
BBFG# wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 7:11 pmI've been known to use things that weren't ever actually made for my medium. (Such as old nail polish or spray cans that someone was throwing out. )
I know a reasonably successful artist - her paintings sell for thousands of dollars, sometimes tens of thousands - and she paints with her own blood and shit. That's "shit", as in faeces.
ROTMetro wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 9:11 pmit’s like assembling and tuning a machine to get the song I hear in my head out, assembling the right parts in the right way, and then sounding 'correct'.
Is that how it works for you? I've never had that experience. For me there is never any hint of anything until I start playing around. My songs always come out of that. Same with my bandmate. We can start with another song in mind but, obviously, we'll be trying to make something different to that, using it purely as inspiration. A few times I've had maybe a bassline in my head but it's just a sequence of notes, I've never had a sound in my head for it. What I end up with is invariably nothing like the thing in my head was, so it also just serves as inspiration.
On hardware being gone forever - yes but you don’t save hardware settings in the DAW. It’s usually audio written to disk. Unless you have a habit of freezing tracks to disk and throwing away the plugins the plugins tend to stay on projects. And over time with computer upgrades the plugins fall off and projects don’t recall. Don’t pretend you don’t know the problem I’m talking about. Every producer has run into this. It requires innate discipline to render stems and in many of the ‘rough idea’ projects we don’t do it.

On the cost - yeah I was wrong and I think you’re right, now that I think about it more. HW does cost more overall and the cost to recoup is non trivial. One advantage with HW is there’s some inherent value in it just by existing. Even if the triton plugin can almost replace the hardware, you still see korg tritons being sold. I was amazed I could buy and sell a Roland standalone DAW VS-24xx after 2 years of not using it, for the same price I bought it for.

Post

What you're saying really only applies to Macs. As I said, I can still load and play every song we've ever done on a computer, all the way back to 2001 or so, when we started using Orion version 1.2. Old 32 bit versions of Orion still load in Windows 11, all the old plugins still load and play and the whole shebang only takes up 300 MB on my drive. So no, I have never experienced the problems you're talking about. Conversely, though, none of the years of work I did with my hardware is accessible to me today, nor has it been for 20 or more years. What never got recorded is gone forever.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron

Post

keyman_sam wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 1:45 am On hardware being gone forever - yes but you don’t save hardware settings in the DAW. It’s usually audio written to disk. Unless you have a habit of freezing tracks to disk and throwing away the plugins the plugins tend to stay on projects. And over time with computer upgrades the plugins fall off and projects don’t recall. Don’t pretend you don’t know the problem I’m talking about.
If that is a legit problem for you and something that concerns you why are you not rendering all your tracks to audio before you save them? It's also much much faster to render software synth tracks to audio than with hardware as with hardware you have to do it in real time

It's simple before you archive a track render out all the stems and save them along with all the MIDI and Instrument tracks

The real question however that I have is how often is anyone legitimately going back to tracks they worked on 10-15 years ago? I have all of them saved on a hard drive, but I never go back and work on them

If I did I have the stems as audio files, and if I don't want to use them I can more than likely use the same plugin and if I can't recreate something similar pretty easily

The real issue however is if I don't want to use the stem why would I want to rework it using the same plugin anyway? Why wouldn't I use something new

Post

BONES wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 2:04 am And unless you build your own custom kernel, Linux is at least as bloated as Windows, often moreso. e.g. When Windows installed off a single CD-ROM, SUSE Linux came with 6 CDs and you had to install packages from all of them. It took up more disc space than Windows by the time you were done. I love the way I could customise the UX but even that became an object lesson in why Linux sucks - my favourite window manager was a thing called WindowMaker and when I started using it in 2000 it was at version 0.5x or something. 25 years later it still hasn't got to version 1.0 and development has moved from one place to another the whole time, as one person gets bored with it and someone else decides to take it on. One thing that hasn't changed in all that time is the website, which looks exactly the same as it did 25 years ago. It makes me a bit sad, if I'm honest, and that's my whole experience with Linux - it promises so much and delivers so little.

The lesson I learned is that you should always choose the applications you want/need and then find the OS that best supports them. The OS itself is largely irrelevant, it's the applications that matter and once you've got those choices locked in, the OS mostly chooses itself.
Ah! Bones............we've been down this road before.... I'm going to say it again. Things have changed SO MUCH since you last used Linux. You no longer need to build a custom kernel. You use kernel parameters to turn on or off features of the kernel you want to use. Also, it is monolithic, but so is the kernel Windows uses, and it isn't bloated as you say, it's simply got the drivers already available. Windows doesn't. Every byte of code that you call bloat is essential. If you were to compare the linux kernel (with its drivers), vs the Windows kernel (with its drivers), there would be no contest. Linux is much, much smaller.

Also, it's not Linux's fault that your favorite desktop environment was WindowMaker, and it didn't get developed as you would like it to be. That was pure coincidence--there's still a dozen more available desktop environments available that are so much better than WindowMaker. Windows and MacOS each only have one choice, whether you like it or not. KDE (one of the desktop environments in Linux) could look almost exactly as Windows does now, if one wanted to use that theme. Gnome (another desktop environment in Linux) could look like MacOS if it wanted to, or something completely different even. Each of these desktop environments are completely separate from each other, and can act completely differently, and offer different things. The key, is to stick with the most popular desktop environments, and from them make it to be exactly what you want it to be. It's no effort at all, and no other OS (well....except for BSD) can do that.

The lesson you learned, "...you should always choose the applications you want/need and then find the OS that best supports them." is largely correct. This is still a problem in the Linux world. But there are other lessons to be learned as well that I would argue are equally applicable. For instance, I prefer the openness and freedom that comes from Linux.

There are pitfalls if one is not experienced, I admit. But I've learned that if I stick with what is popular, I have almost no problems at all. I pick all of my equipment carefully, right from the beginning, and make sure it supports Linux properly--that's the hard part. After that, I never give drivers or anything like that another thought. Everything simply works. And as long as the hardware doesn't break, it will continue to stay good--for years and years and years and years. That's a really nice thing for me.

There are solutions for some of the problem of not having all of the software that you want natively. I agree that that's a problem. But it is a problem that grows less important with each passing year, because more and more software is being developed and supported on Linux. There are also ever improving solutions for using software from other OSes too. I prefer native, but if I want, I can run Windows software, Android software, and Intel MacOS software on my system through several various means. So, my point is that although the lack of software is admittedly a problem, it is not as big of a problem as it used to be, and it's getting better all the time.

I won't try to dissuade from Windows. I used to think that everyone should be using Linux, since I truly felt that it was the best operating system. I no longer feel that way. I believe the Linux operating system is best.....for me--not necessarily for others. Each person needs to choose what is best for his/her self. In your case, choosing the applications you want, and then choosing the OS that those applications run on is your main reason for using Windows. That makes complete sense. I no longer would recommend Linux to certain people for certain reasons, and your reason is a good example--there aren't as many applications available as there are for Windows.

Maybe I'm just getting old. I've used Windows, MacOS, and Linux. They've all got their pros and cons, and each person's differing needs will determine what OS is best for that person. I truly feel that if you were to give modern Linux enough time to learn how much things have changed in 25 years, you would not be as harsh with Linux as you are. :)
Vendor‑Dependent Copy Protection: Customers lose. Pirates win.:mad:
(Also: I'm Accused of lying about Linux—it boots, runs my pro audio workflow, stays stable, updates--though yearly dismissed as “niche”. Yet I'm the deluded one.)
:roll:

Post

Nothing that matters has changed. None of the applications I use every day run natively on Linux and that's really the end of it as far as I'm concerned. Only a complete f**king idiot chooses his OS before he chooses the applications he wants to run on it.

There is nothing in your post that has any significance when it comes to choosing my OS. They were things I found attractive about Linux at the time but none of the newer window managers I've seen can hold a candle to Windows 10, so there is no attraction there any more. Even having to f**k around turning things on and off is more effort than I want to have to make. With Windows, I can just buy a new computer, install everything I want on it and it works. It's the minimum effort required to get to where I can start using it for the things I bought it for. Linux feels like buying a four cylinder car and then spending three months shoe-horning a V8 into it to get the performance you wanted before you start driving it. It's much easier to just buy a V8 and be done with it. Sure, it might be more expensive, it might cost more to run and it might not fit in your garage but if it does all the things you bought it for, that's all that really matters in the end. The question becomes are you buying a car to fit in your garage or are you buying a car that allows you to do all the things you really want a car for?

The comment about "the openness and freedom" of Linux is complete bullshit. You are so much more constricted by an OS that doesn't support all the applications you want or need to use, especially if you need to earn a living from it. I can use Photoshop and After Effects and I can also use Blender and GIMP but absolutely no-one is ever going to list GIMP as an application necessary for any job in my profession. You have to have Photoshop and After Effects, those applications are ubiquitous throughout the industry and they don't run natively on Linux.

Then there is the issue of configurations. Will Linux support the rather exotic AMD Z1 Extreme and all the other components of my Legion GO? I'm sure the answer is probably yes but you'd have to make the effort to check, then you'd have to install it all yourself, which is way more work than I'm interested in doing these days. f**k, I use Edge because I can't be arsed installing a 3rd party browser, so installing a whole new OS when there's one already set up and running just isn't going to happen.

When I was interested in Linux, it wasn't really a whole lot more effort than Windows but the thing is, for all that Linux may have improved, Windows hasn't been standing still either. If anything, for the things that matter to me, the gap is probably wider than ever today. The last time I used Linux, in 2009, I had a whole IT department to take care of all that shit and I still had hassles with things like laptop screen res that took IT days or weeks to sort out. At the time I was also dual-booting into Vista or Win7, which also required a bit of effort but today I never, ever have to think about Windows at all, it stays out of my way and lets me get on with the work I want to be doing. It's so good that I have literally forgotten how to fix anything in it, because I never have to. Everything just works and that, my friend, is the kind of freedom I'm looking for in my OS. The other stuff is just nonsense that lives inside your head.
IvyBirds wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 11:57 pmThe real question however that I have is how often is anyone legitimately going back to tracks they worked on 10-15 years ago? I have all of them saved on a hard drive, but I never go back and work on them
We go back to old songs fairly regularly. e.g. About 6 months ago I dredged up a song from our first album, that I probably wrote in about 2000, that we haven't played for 18 or so years. It loaded up fine in the 32 bit version of Orion, it even remembered where the samples were (it used a part I'd written in SimSynth when we were using Fruityloops). so I was easily able to export the song as a MIDI file and load it up into Studio One. I had it up and running in half-an-hour or so. Beyond that, there are still another three songs from that first album that we play fairly regularly. We've kept those up to date over the years but even the switch from Orion to Cubase (which we never used on stage) to Studio One wasn't really a problem when it came to moving old songs across. Certainly not when I compare it to the nightmares I had moving things from the QX5 to the SQD-1 to the Korg M1, then to the O1R/W, then the Trinity. Each one of those upgrades required pauses in live shows of several months while I got enough songs up and running. When I look back on it, hardware was a complete f**king nightmare.

You're right, though, that we are never interested in recreating the song as it was, we always want it to sound as good as it can, which means using newer, better instruments. We kept the SimSynth part in that one song, because it was so integral to the feel of it, but everything else is newer and better than anything we had back then. Then, of course, we added some guitar to it (because we could).

We never freeze tracks or render stems, it's too limiting for the development of the song. Even after we've ruled a line under an album and sent it off to the label for release, I don't stop tweaking them. They constantly evolve as we do. An album is a snapshot in time, a song deserves to have a life well beyond that.
NOVAkILL : Legion GO, AMD Z1x, 16GB RAM, Win11 | Audient EVO 8 | Lumi Keys | Studio Pro 8
Korg Odyssey, bx-oberhausen, Proxima, PolyMax, GR8, JP6K, Union, Atomika,
Invader 2, Flow Motion, Olga, TRK 01, Thorn, Spire, VG Iron

Post

IvyBirds wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 11:57 pm The real issue however is if I don't want to use the stem why would I want to rework it using the same plugin anyway? Why wouldn't I use something new
Or even use the two parts together. Variation is ear candy.

Post

Some tools you love, you need to change because the company behind it sucks. The same is true for an OS. I have enough experience with ProTools to want it, but the hassle and pricing they force on you would make me switch to something else, even if I have to learn new tricks. The reason why some random musician from Australia switches from Orion to Cubase to Studio One is based on that.
The companies behind Photoshop or MS Office suck so big, that I don‘t get why anybody use it at all though there are magnitudes cheaper alternatives around. Even if they don‘t have features you don‘t need anyway…
Most standard applications like text editors, graphics programs and DAWs have enough valid alternatives to be able to work in any OS… Some specialized toys have no alternatives though… In the end we all make simply compromises and still have magnitudes more tools than we had 1980, when we had been forced to use hardware synths…

Post

@ audio junkie:
For instance, I prefer the openness and freedom that comes from Linux.
I've tried both the plugin and standalone versions of openness and freedom, and can never ever coax a sound wave out of them :wink: My hardware and software are still needed. For the curious, AVLinux comes with wine-staging, and the yabridge plugin wrapper installed, and a Reaper demo, so it's pretty easy to test windows plugins, and some are included by default. Changing to a preferred desktop environment is mostly a quick google-search away.

AVLinux customizations, beyond the stock MX Linux it's based on, are the work of a rock band leader, with his personal uses in the forefront, but he (GMaq in some forums) makes it available for all to use and modify as they see fit. And it's extremely useful out of the box. https://www.bandshed.net/
Cheers
Last edited by glokraw on Wed Mar 26, 2025 7:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

Post

Even if the triton plugin can almost replace the hardware, you still see korg tritons being sold.
There's a Triton Extreme for sale in a small town 80 miles from here. I really really want it...could slap the plastic, but I'm almost out of debt, and it's not a desparate need... :(

Post

glokraw wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 7:34 am
Even if the triton plugin can almost replace the hardware, you still see korg tritons being sold.
There's a Triton Extreme for sale in a small town 80 miles from here. I really really want it...could slap the plastic, but I'm almost out of debt, and it's not a desparate need... :(
Check out the plugins first. Same, exact (not just recreated) sounds. Ofc you'll miss the ribbon controller and the warm 'valve tube' analog sound :P But well worth checking out.

Korg really hit it out of the park with their plugins.

Post

i buy 5 to 10, if one was a hit, a *real* Hit, am i happy ! SW has become so so so good.

i was never thinking in terms of: has to sound specifically "like this" or "like that".
Good sound is good sound is good sound.
EQs don´t need "to sound" for me. Comps neither. Etc.
I prefer to shape my sound by my own.

What i want to have is a small set of Tools.
Tools i learn to know. Allways use the same tools ! Then you learn to know.


But Ableton told me some few weeks back, when i had to rescan my plugin folder, i´m at 700 VST3s or AUs. Can´t belive it. Can´t be true. But hwo knows, haha.
I know i was at 300 at some point. I could see it grown to 450. okeeey.
I don´t trust ableton, haha


Yet again, all i need is a small set of ever same tools.
The FX stuff is a different story. I check out anything interesting.
There, i want to have options. So that, just those FX, could easily turn into a pile of 150 plugins i want to keep.

I don´t have too much synths. I quasi never use synths.
But ableton is wrong. i don´t eat that.......NO........GFY....jeebus etc. andwhatnot / NO
"Plugin has turned Drug now"....and the business knows it.

Post

Funky40 wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 3:08 pm But Ableton told me some few weeks back, when i had to rescan my plugin folder, i´m at 700 VST3s or AUs. Can´t belive it. Can´t be true. But hwo knows, haha.
I know i was at 300 at some point. I could see it grown to 450. okeeey.
I don´t trust ableton, haha
Are you installing both the VST3 and AU versions of each plugin? What about VST2?

I make sure to have only the VST3 version installed. And I’m at nearly 600. Easily that and beyond, if I installed all of the ones I have.

It is a constant struggle between culling the plugins I have installed, and adding more to the list.
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP

Post

jamcat wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 3:23 pm Are you installing both the VST3 and AU versions of each plugin? What about VST2?
I install VST3 and AU. No "VST", no AAX
jamcat wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 3:23 pm It is a constant struggle between culling the plugins I have installed, and adding more to the list.
yeah, same.
"Plugin has turned Drug now"....and the business knows it.

Post

Funky40 wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 8:26 pm I install VST3 and AU.
Do you have good reason to install both?
Such as you use an AU exclusive host like Logic that you need them for?
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP

Post

The tool analogy sucks, I've never needed 18 PHZ-2 drivers with different shaped and coloured handles, or 7 angle grinders from different brands or 59pcs of 13mm ratchet wrenches. Which is what large plugin collections essentially are, dozens of minutely different variants for the same purpose when a couple would suffice.

Or maybe I just suck at hoarding in general, I only have a handful of guitar pedals too.

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”