So we are back to square 1, is there a clear definition of analog sound (vs what?)?pdxindy wrote:And if someone can surpass the analogue, why not do so? It seems you are still trying to prove some sort of cheating where none is possible and most everyone would approve anyway.Mutant wrote:But if they could EASILY get it much closer (and if B sounds worse, then closer would mean worse), then it would point at the possibility of the OP making some effort to >>surpass<< the analog with Diva, not just match it.
When U-he decided to make Diva, what was their goal? Emulating some hardware or achieving a certain sound they had in mind?
