I have always had trouble with the idea of boy bands, not from a musical, marketing or exploitation points of view, but from the actual members.
So, half-decent looking teenage boy ('cause they are never actually really good looking) is sitting at home gazing at his posters of N*Sync, the Backstreet Boys, Blue, etc thinking
"oh I so want that life. Singing awful songs to 12 year old girls, having to be pushed around by stropping middle-ages managers (who might have a crush on us), forced into a unsavoury plasic world of sugar-spun fads, and having to exploit a possible non-existant gay part of my personality/sexuality to make us appeal to the gay market"
I mean, what do they want to get out of it?? Music credibility? hmmm, I dont know about that one. Money? Hah! unless you write the songs, you will have none to show for it. Girls? Well only if you are inclined in the Garry Glitter way...
I mean what is it??? how come they want to do this instead of being in Linkin Park/Limp Bizkit/The Merry Thoughts, etc???
I just find it odd that teenage boys want to be placed in such a heart-bleedingly awful situation with zero control over your life and nothing to show at the end.
I hope that this does not come across as sexist or homophobic, cause it aint meant to be. Girl bands have a long and illustrious history that blows boy bands out of the water.
Oh and the Jackson 5 / The Jacksons dont count




