What exactly is "Music" anyway?
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
You think its a no brainer, and when you actually try to put it into words...... 
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
-
- KVRist
- 88 posts since 6 Jul, 2005 from Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, United States
i was thinking something similar recently. why is uplifting music uplifiting? are we genetically preprogrammed to respond a certain way to certain progressions or is this just environmental conditioning and completely arbitrary. i guess it has something to do with a certain degree of controlled symmetry being involved but that still doesn't explain everything.
-
- KVRist
- 499 posts since 11 Jul, 2004 from Southern California, USA
I think it's entirely subjective. Whenever I hear someone say, "That genre isn't music," or "That song isn't music," or "That artist isn't music," I want to stab that person in the neck with a ball point pen and say, who the f**k are you to make such a pronouncement? Who died and made you Prime Arbiter of the Musical Universe? You sound just like the scheming egotists who prowled the grounds of my university campus, trying to tell people what God is.
Hm, I guess that nerve is still tender.
Hm, I guess that nerve is still tender.
-
- KVRist
- 432 posts since 12 Mar, 2004
Your music must suck!MackTuesday wrote:I think it's entirely subjective. Whenever I hear someone say, "That genre isn't music," or "That song isn't music," or "That artist isn't music," I want to stab that person in the neck with a ball point pen and say, who the fcuk are you to make such a pronouncement? Who died and made you Prime Arbiter of the Musical Universe? You sound just like the scheming egotists who prowled the grounds of my university campus, trying to tell people what God is.
Hm, I guess that nerve is still tender.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
Yeah thats a damn good start.nuffink wrote:Wiki has a crack.
But it really just explains why the question is so difficult to answer. You can never really pin it down in a satisfactory manner.
I think this amorphousness is a big part of its power.
-
- KVRAF
- 1868 posts since 26 Oct, 2002 from San Francisco
Know what you mean! Just spoke with my brother-in-law for the first time in a couple of years. One of the first things he asked was "So I take it you still aren't listening to any REAL music yet, eh?"MackTuesday wrote:I think it's entirely subjective. Whenever I hear someone say, "That genre isn't music," or "That song isn't music," or "That artist isn't music," I want to stab that person in the neck with a ball point pen and say, who the fcuk are you to make such a pronouncement? Who died and made you Prime Arbiter of the Musical Universe? You sound just like the scheming egotists who prowled the grounds of my university campus, trying to tell people what God is.
Hm, I guess that nerve is still tender.
Nice guy though
Mike
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Yeah, REAL music. It ain't ear candy. It takes some real work to get through. All those banjos and bagpipes and chainsaws. It's certainly not for everyone.
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 21 Feb, 2004 from somewhere! anywhere!
i take this line from the wiki,
'According to musicologist Jean-Jacques Nattiez (1990 p.47-8,55): "The border between music and noise is always culturally defined--which implies that, even within a single society, this border does not always pass through the same place; in short, there is rarely a consensus.... By all accounts there is no single and intercultural universal concept defining what music might be."'
as being a good starting point for mere convenience. but i would like to change "even within a single society", to "even within a single individual", as i can readily find myself easily in conflict with my prior notions and former concerns on such matters within a very short space of time. infact i rather enjoy such oscillation of opinion - a condition that eventually undermined my career in local government, thank goodness!
'According to musicologist Jean-Jacques Nattiez (1990 p.47-8,55): "The border between music and noise is always culturally defined--which implies that, even within a single society, this border does not always pass through the same place; in short, there is rarely a consensus.... By all accounts there is no single and intercultural universal concept defining what music might be."'
as being a good starting point for mere convenience. but i would like to change "even within a single society", to "even within a single individual", as i can readily find myself easily in conflict with my prior notions and former concerns on such matters within a very short space of time. infact i rather enjoy such oscillation of opinion - a condition that eventually undermined my career in local government, thank goodness!
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 21 Feb, 2004 from somewhere! anywhere!
i'd lke to raise slight issue with my previous post and suggest that in addition to not really saying anything original i'd be wise to consider this; perhaps music is best understood through its power to invert our linguistics through a carnival of analogies, metaphor and simile.
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Sybil: "BAAASIL!!! Turn OFF that racket!!"
Basil: "That's Brahm's 3rd Racket"
- Farty Towels
Basil: "That's Brahm's 3rd Racket"
- Farty Towels
perception: the stuff reality is made of.


