For a new format to take hold it needs to offer significant advantages over CDs. MP3 players are moving in because of size and storage space, but DVDs are the same size as CDs.
Sound quality really does not matter a great deal to most people.
Poll: Your Current Working Sample Rate?
-
- KVRAF
- 1718 posts since 3 Sep, 2003
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRAF
- 7879 posts since 24 May, 2002 from Tutukaka, New Zealand
Hmmm...sounds tempting, but I would have absolutely no idea what I was doing. 
I think I'd be a bit wary of overclocking etc...my DAW is OK for my needs mostly anyway.
I think I'd be a bit wary of overclocking etc...my DAW is OK for my needs mostly anyway.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
Cool links there Jonny, thank youJonny Mumra wrote:I know for a fact that most respected leading authorities in digital audio record at 44.1khz
If the destination is Cd 44.1khz
Nika Aldrich for 1.
Also there is this for some clarity, http://www.lavryengineering.com/documen ... Theory.pdf
Then this http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index. ... 2997/0/0/0
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
Bit depth is important - best to stick with 24-bit and up for editing and as high as possible for recording.Lind0n wrote:yeah bit depth seems to be more important I've found. 24-bit makes 16-bit sound naff, where-as 44.1 dont sound too bad even compared to 96....
I assume most stay with 24/32 bit till final render.
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
Interesting results. I was expecting far more folks would be using higher sample rates. Now I don't feel quite so inferior and cheesy. :-D Emphasis on "quite."
-
- KVRAF
- 5341 posts since 8 Aug, 2003 from Berlin Germany
I always use 44.1 because I mix for CD and have limited CPU resources so it just makes sense to me.
-
- KVRist
- 339 posts since 16 Aug, 2004
I know for a fact that where i live, most people record at 48 kHz because it's standard, and i guess that's what makes the difference: what is the standard? I don't think 44.1 or 48 makes much difference soundwise...Jonny Mumra wrote:I know for a fact that most respected leading authorities in digital audio record at 44.1khz
If the destination is Cd 44.1khz
Nika Aldrich for 1.
Also there is this for some clarity, http://www.lavryengineering.com/documen ... Theory.pdf
Then this http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index. ... 2997/0/0/0
-
- "The" Jazz
- 4560 posts since 18 Aug, 2004 from California, United States
11,025 Hz. Gives me that lo-fi sound.
-
- KVRAF
- 10588 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
same here. If I changed from 44.1 to 48 i would probably trick my mind into thinking it sounded good, but if someone secretly changed it back i wouldnt notice.Panda wrote:I don't think 44.1 or 48 makes much difference soundwise...
