Any NON-ProTools hit records?
-
- KVRian
- 1305 posts since 30 Jan, 2004
A recording buddy of mine was "showing off" that in a Digidesign magazine, something like 99 of the top 100 albums on the chart were produced with Pro Tools (the other "one" being unknown).
I am trying to make the case for pro sound withOUT Pro Tools and I am wondering if anyone knows of any releases by more known bands or solo artists that did NOT use P/T AT ALL during production and mixing. (Mastering is fine since that would probably be outsourced anyway.)
I am just wondering so I can "give them a listen" so to speak. I think one or more of Kylie's were done with Cubase, but honestly I don't know of any others just not being at all familiar with dtudio production.
Thanks all, as usual, I do always appreciate any and all input,
- Paul
I am trying to make the case for pro sound withOUT Pro Tools and I am wondering if anyone knows of any releases by more known bands or solo artists that did NOT use P/T AT ALL during production and mixing. (Mastering is fine since that would probably be outsourced anyway.)
I am just wondering so I can "give them a listen" so to speak. I think one or more of Kylie's were done with Cubase, but honestly I don't know of any others just not being at all familiar with dtudio production.
Thanks all, as usual, I do always appreciate any and all input,
- Paul
-
- KVRAF
- 1869 posts since 15 Sep, 2003 from Land of Crazies, USA
This was in a Digidesign magazine?
Methinks the Top 100 albums was slightly skewed in their favor.
Methinks the Top 100 albums was slightly skewed in their favor.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1305 posts since 30 Jan, 2004
Yeah, I know the obvious non-biasness certainly does NOT apply...but it did get me to thinking who DOESN'T use the "hogh holy" Pro Tools and is it really necessary anymore due to generic hardware able to do 24/192 and something like Sonarx64 might just do the same thing quality-wise.
I know that all the producers KNOW Pro-Tools...but if suddenly every producer in the world got amnesia, I am wondering what they would REALLY choose given all that is currently out on the market.
I know that all the producers KNOW Pro-Tools...but if suddenly every producer in the world got amnesia, I am wondering what they would REALLY choose given all that is currently out on the market.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
What on earth are you trying to gain from such a petty argument? Of coarse a "pro" sound can be achieved without Pro Tools. Currently, it's the de facto standard for recording, but that certainly doesn't mean that other apps can't provide similar results.PaulG wrote:A recording buddy of mine was "showing off" that in a Digidesign magazine, something like 99 of the top 100 albums on the chart were produced with Pro Tools (the other "one" being unknown).
I am trying to make the case for pro sound withOUT Pro Tools and I am wondering if anyone knows of any releases by more known bands or solo artists that did NOT use P/T AT ALL during production and mixing. (Mastering is fine since that would probably be outsourced anyway.)
I am just wondering so I can "give them a listen" so to speak. I think one or more of Kylie's were done with Cubase, but honestly I don't know of any others just not being at all familiar with dtudio production.
Thanks all, as usual, I do always appreciate any and all input,
- Paul
-
- KVRian
- 504 posts since 12 Oct, 2003
I am using mainly Logic and sometimes Cubase and DP. But I do all my audio recording editing and mixing in PT HD. For me Protools is the most straight ahead for audio editing and mixing.And also the easiest on the eye. And as someone said it became the big studio standart just like SSL.
-
- KVRist
- 39 posts since 25 Oct, 2006 from Liverpool
I started out with Pro24 ( long time ago now ), then onto Cubase/VST & working with Cubase SX now.
The people I was working with back then used both Pro24 & Cubase to produce 3 Albums ( Which I know charted here in the UK ).
I tried Pro Tools a few years back... Didn't like the fact that it had no loop cycle.
Stayed with VST. Maybe I needed to give it a bit more time???
Eitherway, SX does the job for me.
The people I was working with back then used both Pro24 & Cubase to produce 3 Albums ( Which I know charted here in the UK ).
I tried Pro Tools a few years back... Didn't like the fact that it had no loop cycle.
Stayed with VST. Maybe I needed to give it a bit more time???
Eitherway, SX does the job for me.
-
- KVRAF
- 1869 posts since 15 Sep, 2003 from Land of Crazies, USA
I'll probably be doing my album in Acid. Loads most of the same 3rd party plugins as PT, and gives me more tracks than LE or M-Powered.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
He sad "pro sounding" not "stupid crap sounding garbage".Jeebs Fat wrote:Kanye's new album is being done in REAPER.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
*giggle*PaulG wrote:in a Digidesign magazine
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
you dont know what youre talking aboutJohn Vulich wrote:He sad "pro sounding" not "stupid crap sounding garbage".Jeebs Fat wrote:Kanye's new album is being done in REAPER.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Yeah, I still hear MC Hammer on the radio all the time. It's music of lasting and permanent quality. Kanye's music is just as vital and important. All of them, classics to be cherished forever.
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
fair 'nuffLunch Money wrote:Well, I suspect he knows what he likes and therefore knows what he's talking about. I for one disagree and think Kanye's tracks sound great.
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Production techniques and lasting artistic quality are two different matters. Though I'm being sarcastic about the quality, I'm sure that his music is well produced... like so much other corporate plastic assembly line crap. However, I don't think people, other than die hard fans, will be listening to him 10-20 years from now.Lunch Money wrote:Well, I suspect he knows what he likes and therefore knows what he's talking about. I for one disagree and think Kanye's tracks sound great.

