SSL now underwriting Ardour DAW development for Linux
-
- KVRAF
- 1949 posts since 21 Mar, 2003 from Labrador
Saw this on the Sound on Sound web site. SSL (Solid State Logic), makers of those monster studio mixers, is paying the developer of the Linux DAW, Ardour to work full time on Ardour development.
http://www.soundonsound.com/forum/showf ... t=1#365025
http://www.soundonsound.com/forum/showf ... t=1#365025
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Great to see substantial DAW development backing on Linux.
I suppose this will have implications on future digital mixer real-time OS choices.
I suppose this will have implications on future digital mixer real-time OS choices.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
I read that press release and see the same old stuff that all development startups and big-money backers say when there's a match.
Which isn't a bad thing per se, it's just that I don't think one can accurately predict anything at all about Ardour or SSL's continuing tiptoeing into software at this stage of the game.
-
- KVRAF
- 1898 posts since 4 Mar, 2004 from The Forests of Lombard
I did see an article in Computer Music that mentioned that SSL is looking to expand. I don't know the extent of that. It would be nice to see Ardour get some real money and {more} development time. ...Especially given that it's open source. I'm not sure why they went that way rather than with Muse or Rosegarden or some more appropriate package...
-
- KVRAF
- 16154 posts since 2 Dec, 2003 from Nashville, TN
I know I have seen in a couple places that SSL is already producing smaller systems that would be similar to a budget studio digital console, like a Control 24 or something like it. I believe Neve was also talking about it
Brent
Brent
My host is better than your host
-
- KVRAF
- 3528 posts since 18 Apr, 2002 from British Columbia, Canada
Ardour is really good! this is cool news... well, i think it is... do you think it will remain opensource?
Well, even so it would be good for the developer/s,
Well, even so it would be good for the developer/s,
-
- KVRian
- 831 posts since 7 Sep, 2004
First, i don't believe what managers say. They are liars by profession.
And if a company pays an independent developer, then they expect something.
1. The developer is no longer independent. After a few months, when he quit the other job, then they maybe will give him some 'suggestions', where he should concentrate at.
2. SSL is obviously interested to expand. The deal with Waves and the Duende DSP-gear are showing this.
And if a company pays an independent developer, then they expect something.
1. The developer is no longer independent. After a few months, when he quit the other job, then they maybe will give him some 'suggestions', where he should concentrate at.
2. SSL is obviously interested to expand. The deal with Waves and the Duende DSP-gear are showing this.
-
- KVRAF
- 3964 posts since 31 Aug, 2003 from In a foreign town, in a foreign land
Well, several OSS devs are working for big companies, so it needn't be a problem.
Hopefully, this will mean a steady developement for Ardour. That would be very nice. I wonder if it would be possible to implement stuff like .bwf or .omf.
Groet, Erik
Hopefully, this will mean a steady developement for Ardour. That would be very nice. I wonder if it would be possible to implement stuff like .bwf or .omf.
Groet, Erik
Pop music delenda est.


-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
Since Peter Gabriel and the gang took over SSL, they've really done some interesting things with the company. I imagine this will have implications with that workstation company buyout they did earlier this year.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1949 posts since 21 Mar, 2003 from Labrador
Ya,SSL is for sure a player-big time. It's the type of news that get's me thinking:'What are they up to? Hmmm...'Kingston wrote:Great to see substantial DAW development backing on Linux.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1949 posts since 21 Mar, 2003 from Labrador
When? Are you serious, or is this just another 'I'm bored so I'll yank their chain' type posts?shamann wrote:Since Peter Gabriel and the gang took over SSL, they've really done some interesting things with the company. I imagine this will have implications with that workstation company buyout they did earlier this year.
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
When what, that SSL bought a workstation company or the Peter Gabriel bit?Improv wrote:When? Are you serious, or is this just another 'I'm bored so I'll yank their chain' type posts?shamann wrote:Since Peter Gabriel and the gang took over SSL, they've really done some interesting things with the company. I imagine this will have implications with that workstation company buyout they did earlier this year.
Either way, I yank not your chain:
http://news.harmony-central.com/News/20 ... uired.html
http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/20 ... Sydec.html
-
- KVRAF
- 1869 posts since 15 Sep, 2003 from Land of Crazies, USA
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1949 posts since 21 Mar, 2003 from Labrador
Yupshamann wrote:the Peter Gabriel bit?
Thanks.

