Image Line

boxynbaby · Post by **boxynbaby** » Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:37 am

ddbbbbbbbbbbbbb

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:42 am

You went for a more stable platform that's more stable because it has no software, there's nothing to be shocked about

boxynbaby · Post by **boxynbaby** » Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:49 pm

tter tha

Rusty Shackleford · Post by **Rusty Shackleford** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:19 am

tony tony chopper wrote:You went for a more stable platform that's more stable because it has no software, there's nothing to be shocked about

A useless post, but one that's hardly surprising on kvr. Image line's put out an os x version of toxic III, so on its face it's not a completely unreasonable question.

boxynbaby: If you've got an intel mac, you could always run FL in Boot Camp, but you're still gonna have to put up with winblows. Someone told me that there's a program called Renoise available for mac(and win) thats somewhat similar to FL but, never having used either, I can't say whether this is true or not. What DAW/sequencer have you been using since you went mac?

cusis · Post by **cusis** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:23 am

HEHE, no offence but serves you right for moving to mac os... no seriosuly it says in the fl studio website that there will never be a mac version, sorry

Cyrosis · Post by **Cyrosis** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:29 am

cusis wrote:HEHE, no offence but serves you right for moving to mac os... no seriosuly it says in the fl studio website that there will never be a mac version, sorry

That is true, and whenever the subject has been brought up, they seem quite firm on this.

As far as OSX vs Windows, your all retarded.

Lagrange · Post by **Lagrange** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:04 am

FL on MAC would be siiiick.. I think your better off looking for an alternative program that works kinda the same..

L

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:01 am

It's a technical restriction, as we've always said - no Delphi for Mac OS, so..

But even if I had the choice, I still wouldn't consider it. I've only heard crap about Mac programming, Apple apparently having no consideration for programmers or backwards compatibility. Basically totally the opposite of Microsoft.

Rusty Shackleford · Post by **Rusty Shackleford** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:48 am

tony tony chopper wrote: Apple apparently having no consideration for programmers or backwards compatibility. Basically totally the opposite of Microsoft.

That *is* a legitimate criticism in the mac vs. pc audio debate(unlike the absurd suggestion that there's no mac audio software). Has nothing to do with what the dude is asking about though.

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:23 am

unlike the absurd suggestion that there's no mac audio software

I said no software, not no audio software

Has nothing to do with what the dude is asking about though.

FL being done in Delphi, I think it has something to do

Toxikator · Post by **Toxikator** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:55 pm

And when Delphi dies and a port is forced it will finally happen.

Meanwhile Mac will be making more steps to support Windows applications because they seem to be trying to pull of that whole "only computer you'll ever need" thing.

fandango · Post by **fandango** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:00 pm

I am unable to crash XP. Am I doing something wrong? Is there a hotfix for this?

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:05 pm

boxynbaby wrote:hey been a long time fruity loops user infact since i can remeber it ever been realsed but i just made the pretty common move to MAC OSX for reasons that its just more stable than windows but i SHOCKED! to find image-line havent raleased a native version for the OSX system does anyone know of any future releases??????? would be a great help

oh.

dear.

you're joking kiddo, right?

forgive me if I chuckle a bit anyway.

machinesworking · Post by **machinesworking** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:12 pm

tony tony chopper wrote: But even if I had the choice, I still wouldn't consider it. I've only heard crap about Mac programming, Apple apparently having no consideration for programmers or backwards compatibility. Basically totally the opposite of Microsoft.

OK so as a mac user why would I buy any of your "mac" compatible software? With an attitude like that, you hurt your own sales of mac versions of your synths. Knowing that Image Line have publicly stated that they find it easier working with windows makes it easy to assume that their efforts for mac will be limited. Let me put it this way, why would I buy a synth from a company that publicly states it's distaste for the platform I use? That would be pretty stupid of me wouldn't it?

Good luck with your mac sales.

FYI NI sell about 50/50 mac/pc

james0tucson · Post by **james0tucson** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:14 pm

Cyrosis wrote:
cusis wrote:HEHE, no offence but serves you right for moving to mac os... no seriosuly it says in the fl studio website that there will never be a mac version, sorry
That is true, and whenever the subject has been brought up, they seem quite firm on this.

As far as OSX vs Windows, your all retarded.

Sooner or later Gol will get his hands on a Macbook Pro, realize it's a good platform (fun to develop for; and I'm speaking as a MacOSX developer), and you might witness the abandonment of the Windows version.