Can a song have two time signatures?
-
- KVRist
- 155 posts since 16 Feb, 2008
I am busting my butt to write a really nice song, writing the notes over and over again, trying to make the vs, chorus, refrain match, but they don't. The song is very melodic; the chords are real nice, BUT the only way everything can be written is if the verse is in 6/8 time, then in comes the chorus of 4/4 time. The refrain is 4/4. Is this acceptable? Maybe I'm not that experienced enough. In all my years of playing the trumpet, I don't think I ran into a song that uses two time signatures. But then again, it reminded me of some latin music where maybe the song starts off slow, then jumps into a faster rhythm. But mine is in two signatures. Mmmm. What to do. I'm not giving up on this song!
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
There are tons of popular pieces using more than one time signature. First few that come to mind - 'All You Need is Love' by the Beatles, 'Solisbury Hill' by Peter Gabriel, 'Money' by Pink Floyd.
Don't worry about that, just write it the way you want. Convention was made to be broken...
Don't worry about that, just write it the way you want. Convention was made to be broken...
- KVRian
- 1024 posts since 8 Mar, 2004 from Network 23
Go for it. Do what works for the song. Serve the muse. There is no spoon.chicagodannyd wrote:I am busting my butt to write a really nice song, writing the notes over and over again, trying to make the vs, chorus, refrain match, but they don't. The song is very melodic; the chords are real nice, BUT the only way everything can be written is if the verse is in 6/8 time, then in comes the chorus of 4/4 time. The refrain is 4/4. Is this acceptable? Maybe I'm not that experienced enough. In all my years of playing the trumpet, I don't think I ran into a song that uses two time signatures. But then again, it reminded me of some latin music where maybe the song starts off slow, then jumps into a faster rhythm. But mine is in two signatures. Mmmm. What to do. I'm not giving up on this song!
We shall see orchestral machines with a thousand new sounds, with thousands of new euphonies, as opposed to the present day's simple sounds of strings, brass, and woodwinds. -- George Antheil, circa 1925 ---
-
- KVRAF
- 2830 posts since 2 Mar, 2003 from The only civilized county in Texas
No problem at all. You see this often in jazz standards, which have an AABA structure. People will often play the A section with a latin-ish rhythm, and the B section with the usual swing rhythm. Or the other way around.chicagodannyd wrote: the verse is in 6/8 time, then in comes the chorus of 4/4 time.
Most versions of Night In Tunesia do this.
Now, two diferent time signatures simultaneously is a bit more rare. I have a duet piece that I sometimes play with has 2/4 in the one instrument, and 6/8 in the other. Since they both play eighth and sixteenth notes it sounds somewhat wild.
Of course, Ives' fourth symphony uses so many simultaneous time signatures that for its first performance they needed three conductors.
Victor.
ObBadJoke: that must have been electrifying.
-
- KVRAF
- 8389 posts since 11 Apr, 2003 from back on the hillside again - but now with a garden!
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
Not sure you're right about Solsbury Hill. I think I worked out is was 7/4, then suddenly found that there was an odd count here and there. I think it's something like the end of each verse is another time signature. Only a small change, but I think it's there.duncanparsons wrote:For a 'popular choice', listen to REM's Shiny Happy People - string quartet in 3/4, rest of song in 4/4.
Poster who cited Solsbury Hill.. sorry, it's 7/4 all the way through, no matter what songbooks may transcribe!
DSP
I'll check.
-
- KVRian
- 1184 posts since 13 May, 2004 from SF Bay Area, California
That's correct, the end of the Chorus switches to two bars of 4/4 (or one bar of 8/4) in place of the expected one bar of 7/4robojam wrote:Not sure you're right about Solsbury Hill. I think I worked out is was 7/4, then suddenly found that there was an odd count here and there. I think it's something like the end of each verse is another time signature. Only a small change, but I think it's there.duncanparsons wrote:For a 'popular choice', listen to REM's Shiny Happy People - string quartet in 3/4, rest of song in 4/4.
Poster who cited Solsbury Hill.. sorry, it's 7/4 all the way through, no matter what songbooks may transcribe!
DSP
I'll check.

If you like 80s retro sounds, check out my latest tune…
-
- KVRAF
- 8389 posts since 11 Apr, 2003 from back on the hillside again - but now with a garden!
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
Probably because it's such a small part of the song. Just kind of jumps out as being 'wrong' in some way when you hear that part. I had to play it back a few times before I realized what it was that made it sound so odd.duncanparsons wrote:wrt S.H. - never noticed that! I sit corrected
DSP
-
- KVRian
- 1184 posts since 13 May, 2004 from SF Bay Area, California
If you really want your expectations messed with, check out Erasure's cover of Solsbury Hill -- they do the whole thing in 4/4, and it sounds so WEIRD in that most "normal" of meters.
If you like 80s retro sounds, check out my latest tune…
-
- KVRAF
- 10170 posts since 2 Jan, 2005 from somewhere in the woods
i have 2 time-signatures: here and there (couldn't resist
)
g'd nite mello
g'd nite mello
"It dreamed itself along"
-
- KVRian
- 628 posts since 4 Mar, 2007
There is even an early GENESIS tune (In the Cage) where the keyboards are in 4/4 and the drummer plays in 3/4 time... very interesting and it only lasts during the intro.
Jim
Jim

