Changes to licensing
-
- KVRian
- 791 posts since 8 Mar, 2006 from Australia
I've just posted an article explaining today's changes to Lite, demos, 30 day trials and serial numbers - http://www.cantabilesoftware.com/blog/article-177.html
-
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Good for you. Your deserve to be compensated for your hard work, and I often thought Cantabile Lite was just too darn good to be free. I'll upgrade from 1.2 immediately. 
-
- KVRAF
- 2310 posts since 13 Apr, 2008 from Germany
I am happy that you didn't go for online activation.
Pity that there isn't any free teaser version any more.
Hope that shifting more towards pro will work out for you.
Good luck
Pity that there isn't any free teaser version any more.
Hope that shifting more towards pro will work out for you.
Good luck
Best regards, TiUser
...and keep on jamming...
...and keep on jamming...
-
- KVRist
- 52 posts since 18 Nov, 2006 from Pennsylvania
Waaaah!!!
I just got back into the home computer music hobby this week, only to find the Cantabile Lite link on KVR is dead. I'm three months late! As a home hobbyist perhaps $49 is a bit steep for features that I probably won't use. I can understand getting rid of the free version, but why not make a solid, feature-reduced, barebones version and charge $20-$25?. (Please?)
I will try the Solo demo after trying VSThost to get a better feel of the features and over-all stability of each. But it looks like the Lite version would have been perfect.
I have no doubt that I will want to buy Cantabile Solo, but it just looks like a lot more that I really need.
Again, Waaaah!!! QQ!!! Waaaah!!!
I'm back. VSThost works ok. But I'm going to buy Cantabile Solo. Its worth it just for the beautiful UI.
I just got back into the home computer music hobby this week, only to find the Cantabile Lite link on KVR is dead. I'm three months late! As a home hobbyist perhaps $49 is a bit steep for features that I probably won't use. I can understand getting rid of the free version, but why not make a solid, feature-reduced, barebones version and charge $20-$25?. (Please?)
I will try the Solo demo after trying VSThost to get a better feel of the features and over-all stability of each. But it looks like the Lite version would have been perfect.
I have no doubt that I will want to buy Cantabile Solo, but it just looks like a lot more that I really need.
Again, Waaaah!!! QQ!!! Waaaah!!!
I'm back. VSThost works ok. But I'm going to buy Cantabile Solo. Its worth it just for the beautiful UI.
WindowsXP/Live6/Podium/WusikStation5/Rhino2/Jamstix2
-
- KVRist
- 120 posts since 13 Feb, 2006 from USA
It's not, though. In a startlingly short time, you'll depend upon features you don't really understand now. You'll start to think $49 cheap. Give the trial version a good workout, to see what I mean.TerryR wrote:Waaaah!!!
I have no doubt that I will want to buy Cantabile Solo, but it just looks like a lot more that I really need.
This thing is just well thought out. You know what you want, but Robinson knows what you need. He has been well ahead of me, at any rate.
Larry
---
---