Does the authenticity of your guitar amp/cab emulaton matter to you?
-
- KVRist
- 177 posts since 7 Aug, 2004
I appreciate how difficult and painstaking the work must be that modeler developers are doing when coding emulations of guitar amps. But I'm usually just looking for a certain general type of tone when I'm recording my guitar. Even when I'm doing a cover, I really don't care how authentic the tone is compared to the original; I usually mix up the arrangement a bit, too.
Usually I just start out with a sim that's close to the tone in my head, then tweak from there until I get the tone I want.
So...am I alone in this? Does the authenticity of the tone matter to you?
Usually I just start out with a sim that's close to the tone in my head, then tweak from there until I get the tone I want.
So...am I alone in this? Does the authenticity of the tone matter to you?
It's better to burn out...than it is to um..to um...well, something, anyway...
-
- KVRAF
- 3645 posts since 27 Nov, 2003 from beach side australia
authenticity? .. not really
I just get happy if its a nice tone and reminds me of guitar sounds i like..
As long as the top isn't harsh is probably the thing that concerns me most often
I get the sounds i like best with amplitube Jimi Hendrix edition and Overloud TH1. I have line 6 stuff (pod xtl, podfarm)but that's mostly got a bit of the harsh top end going on, it can sound ok but it takes a fair bit of work.
I just get happy if its a nice tone and reminds me of guitar sounds i like..
As long as the top isn't harsh is probably the thing that concerns me most often
I get the sounds i like best with amplitube Jimi Hendrix edition and Overloud TH1. I have line 6 stuff (pod xtl, podfarm)but that's mostly got a bit of the harsh top end going on, it can sound ok but it takes a fair bit of work.
-
- KVRist
- 82 posts since 20 Mar, 2005 from Midwest USA
+999
I was just thinking this to myself this morning. I couldn't tell you what a Fender blackface combo sounds like, but I could tell you what sounds I like.
I was just thinking this to myself this morning. I couldn't tell you what a Fender blackface combo sounds like, but I could tell you what sounds I like.
"There is no excuse for dull, noisy, bland recordings except user error." --yep
-
- KVRAF
- 2665 posts since 11 Jun, 2007
Exactly. Couldn't have said it better.Aloysius wrote:Not for me! If it sounds good - it IS good! As an aside: Hardware can sound really crap. It doesn't always 'magically' or 'automatically' sound GREAT!
Shogger
What?
- KVRAF
- 18510 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I said it in another thread, and I'll say it here. While I don't care much about the "authenticity" of the emulation I'm playing, I do consider the reason the hardware is being emulated. Played the latest Create amp emulator? No, because their hardware is nothing special. The reason stuff like a Fender Blackface is emulated is because it's a classic. Something that was developed over many years and deemed desirable. It's no accident. So why not start at a place where we know most of us agree was a successful place? Makes sense. Of course, I appreciate the developers who say, Well, we know the Blackface never had x, so let's improve on it..."
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
I've always wondered about how someone would know how authentic an emulation is without having personal experience with that hardware, and there are a multitude of emulations, so it's unlikely anyone would have intimate knowledge of each and every one. Outside of A/B testing, personal experience seems the only criterion to judge the quality of an emulation.
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
-
- KVRist
- 185 posts since 17 Apr, 2004
Authenticity matters to me. Maybe I'm just a picky bastard. So far I am not completely satisfied with any amp sims. Amplitube 2 is still the best for me. But I haven't yet tried NI's guitar rig 4.
The reason, I think, is credibility. Keeping high standards will improve the quality of products in the future.

The reason, I think, is credibility. Keeping high standards will improve the quality of products in the future.
-
- KVRian
- 872 posts since 25 Aug, 2006
Same here.Aloysius wrote:Not for me! If it sounds good - it IS good! As an aside: Hardware can sound really crap. It doesn't always 'magically' or 'automatically' sound GREAT!
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
no
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 3864 posts since 29 Feb, 2004
If somebody creates something entirely new I'll judge it on its own merits.
With emulations however I can't see how anything less than 100% would cut it as a design goal.
The more you're familiar with the real amps the more you'll benefit from emulations that really deserve the name. On my hardware amps I can dial in the sound for a certain guitar "blind" mostly, switch on standby and bam !
With sims, until recently endless tweaking was necessary to get in the ballpark at least
, fortunately GR4's CR is a huge step in the right direction for me, also giving more authenticity to AT and TH-1. 
And re the argument of technological progress, like zerocrossing said, walk before you fly.
Once you got an authentic emu going, nothing's gonna stop you to offer additional parameters/tweaks/goodies, but these should be on a 2nd GUI page or behind a cover like in GR and bypassed by default.
Ymmv,
susiwong
With emulations however I can't see how anything less than 100% would cut it as a design goal.
The more you're familiar with the real amps the more you'll benefit from emulations that really deserve the name. On my hardware amps I can dial in the sound for a certain guitar "blind" mostly, switch on standby and bam !
With sims, until recently endless tweaking was necessary to get in the ballpark at least
And re the argument of technological progress, like zerocrossing said, walk before you fly.
Once you got an authentic emu going, nothing's gonna stop you to offer additional parameters/tweaks/goodies, but these should be on a 2nd GUI page or behind a cover like in GR and bypassed by default.
Ymmv,
susiwong
-
- KVRian
- 598 posts since 3 Dec, 2005 from Sweden
Intresting tread. I thought it was only me that was satisfied with what sounded good to my ears. And I cant hear the diffrence among diffrent amps. Shure I hear that that is probaply an Fender or an Mrshall etc. But I feel more what is right for this or that song. Also how you are play is a big key, but you knew that already of course. There is though a real diffence when you play a tube amp. And I have get to find anything with the same attack.

- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
so what you're saying is that if the emulation is precise then it's easier because you can set it up like your physical version of the amp and you're good to go? This kind of confuses me, you me and many others here understand the days of 1-3 (tops) sounding amps because we lived it. I honestly think that quite a few guitar players back in those days chose their style by the amp they had. With tube amps for a long time there weren't a whole lot of amps with more than one channel.susiwong wrote:If somebody creates something entirely new I'll judge it on its own merits.
With emulations however I can't see how anything less than 100% would cut it as a design goal.
The more you're familiar with the real amps the more you'll benefit from emulations that really deserve the name. On my hardware amps I can dial in the sound for a certain guitar "blind" mostly, switch on standby and bam !
With sims, until recently endless tweaking was necessary to get in the ballpark at least, fortunately GR4's CR is a huge step in the right direction for me, also giving more authenticity to AT and TH-1.
And re the argument of technological progress, like zerocrossing said, walk before you fly.![]()
Once you got an authentic emu going, nothing's gonna stop you to offer additional parameters/tweaks/goodies, but these should be on a 2nd GUI page or behind a cover like in GR and bypassed by default.
Ymmv,
susiwong
I wonder if the endless tweaking you do is because you can and the grass is always greener. When I choose an amp model I familiarize myself with "knobs" and then work that knowledge into setting my sound. Naturally the process of that is nearly instantaneous because I'm calcuating the data (for lack of a better term) in my head, I hate say it but for me that really is a no brainer. I never actually think about it, I just seem to know what I'm going to get with a sim quick and I adapt my thinking to the response of the controls.
So I think I spend a lot less time tweaking than playing, however that may not be true with an amp. I wish I had all the time back I've spent trying to get the mic just right, trying to set the amp for the room I'm in, there's really so many variations that can happen to the sound, or perhaps nothing but in my head I'm sure something is off. This is what I think presets are for, I can save the tone for whatever I'm working on and I know it will always be the same.
So even though turning everything to 10 on an amp doesn't take long I think I get quicker results I'm happy with using sims. (though I do use the sansamp a lot)
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- KVRAF
- 2909 posts since 15 Feb, 2007 from ...in the butt
But what if the sound you like happens to come from a specific kind of emu?
Here's what I'm gettin at:
I like high gain tones. Before I got PODFarm I was a fierce devotee of Dirthead. I got PODFarm and fell in love with the Angel P-ball. Then LePou releases LE456 and that smokes any tone I can get outta the Angel P-ball emu. My point? I knew the P-ball emu in PODFarm was an emu of on ENGL Powerball. I was not aware, until recently, that both Dirthead and LE456 were Powerball emu's as well. I just naturally gravitated toward that "sound" totally unaware of the fact that they were based on the same schematics.
Here's what I'm gettin at:
I like high gain tones. Before I got PODFarm I was a fierce devotee of Dirthead. I got PODFarm and fell in love with the Angel P-ball. Then LePou releases LE456 and that smokes any tone I can get outta the Angel P-ball emu. My point? I knew the P-ball emu in PODFarm was an emu of on ENGL Powerball. I was not aware, until recently, that both Dirthead and LE456 were Powerball emu's as well. I just naturally gravitated toward that "sound" totally unaware of the fact that they were based on the same schematics.
-
hivefleetmegalon hivefleetmegalon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=202099
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 1 Mar, 2009 from Satan's Hollow
For me at least, I would love cranking up an old Mesa Boogie Mark IV, or my friend's Carvin head, but I don't have the cashflow to throw at a real amp right now, nor do I have the space to actually house one. When I found out about virtual amps, I was in heaven. I'd love to be a purist, but I'm more concerned with making music... besides, these days I seem less bent on making real guitar noises (it's too much fun running my classical guitar through a synth emu!) 
I am the musical equivalent of a brick...
