Few chords but intresting song, how?
-
- KVRist
- 128 posts since 22 Apr, 2011
There's a song that it's first chords are Gm Am Dm Gm Am Dm repeated twice through all the song, chorus and verse same chords. Theres also a Refrain: Gm C F D/F# G
How do you know which chords to pick according to the chorus and verse?
And how do you make it sound intresting with not so much chords?
Thanks guys!
How do you know which chords to pick according to the chorus and verse?
And how do you make it sound intresting with not so much chords?
Thanks guys!
-
- KVRer
- 21 posts since 2 Oct, 2011
The choice of chords for the chorus is your choice
You dont want us to take out all the fun for you, do you? 
And to keep minimal chord changes interesting voice lead them. Also interesting melodies go a long way... think of how many songs revolve around the I-IV-V progression
And to keep minimal chord changes interesting voice lead them. Also interesting melodies go a long way... think of how many songs revolve around the I-IV-V progression
-
- KVRAF
- 7837 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
A few things.
Rhyhtmic variation, Arrangement practices, melodic variances, accentuation.
Also tempo.
Regarding arrangment. Even one guitar or one piano can have an arrangement value. How you shape the chords, inversions, ommisions (poqwer chords extentions, inversions. arpeggios, Alternating patterns. You don't have to throw the whole kitchen sink in the first measure and keep it there throughout.
As well a 3 or 6 bar progression isn't really a good idea in a jazz, blues, rock, country, gospel, pop, folk settings. Usually you want to round them in fours.
Also starting on the 5th and ending on the root while it works for turnarounds really doesn't work well as a main progression. It's okay to use common progressions everyone does.
Rhyhtmic variation, Arrangement practices, melodic variances, accentuation.
Also tempo.
Regarding arrangment. Even one guitar or one piano can have an arrangement value. How you shape the chords, inversions, ommisions (poqwer chords extentions, inversions. arpeggios, Alternating patterns. You don't have to throw the whole kitchen sink in the first measure and keep it there throughout.
As well a 3 or 6 bar progression isn't really a good idea in a jazz, blues, rock, country, gospel, pop, folk settings. Usually you want to round them in fours.
Also starting on the 5th and ending on the root while it works for turnarounds really doesn't work well as a main progression. It's okay to use common progressions everyone does.
Dell Vostro i9 64GB Ram Windows 11 Pro, Cubase, Bitwig, Mixcraft Guitar Pod Go, Linntrument Nektar P1, Novation Launchpad
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 128 posts since 22 Apr, 2011
Thanks guys! It's really helpful. It's intresting how songs with a common progression, stil has the power to be unique and original. Do you know a good source to leaarn the things mentioned here?
-
- KVRAF
- 7837 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
You actually have too much information and not enough ability.Nicksaf wrote:Hello again!As usual still don't have enough basis to understand what im hearing, but it builds up slowly...
You are thinking too much and not practicing enough. You need to develop a sense of rhythm that stands on it's own.
It's like lifting wieghts. You can read all about lifting wieghts watch movies about wieght lifters but you'll never gain any mass or tone unless you actually lift wieghts. Practice, practice some more and after that practice some more. Practice different rhythms at different tempo's. A good guitarist or keyboard player can do more with two chords and a solid sense of rhythm then a bad one with hundreds of chords.
Dell Vostro i9 64GB Ram Windows 11 Pro, Cubase, Bitwig, Mixcraft Guitar Pod Go, Linntrument Nektar P1, Novation Launchpad
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
'a basis'. What I did when I was around 15, once I could get around a little bit on a guitar, I copied things off of records. I had no real basis in theory, as far as picking up the particular notes and chords off these records, the little bit of book learning I had wasn't so relevant. I didn't know from roman numbers or any of that. Trial and error. After a bit, you understand from patterns, predictable things you encountered just before. The relevant thing was enough time getting my hands (with my head/ears) to know where common things were on a guitar. By the time I did chance upon a little booklet with a list of common chord progressions, the formualaic kind of ones that you hear all the time... and then a theory course... so 'ii-V-I' made complete sense. For me there goes three if not four years, which a person today doesn't want, I understand that.
The point is the descriptions of what happens was more tha cart [of understanding]; rather than asking it to pull the horse, the horse was already in motion.
Nowadays people think it's all on the internet for free, a click away. Mike's analogy is spot on, like you get on a bicycle; until you can stay balanced on one by doing it (and falling down at first), you aren't riding a bicycle.
Information is not knowledge.
The point is the descriptions of what happens was more tha cart [of understanding]; rather than asking it to pull the horse, the horse was already in motion.
Nowadays people think it's all on the internet for free, a click away. Mike's analogy is spot on, like you get on a bicycle; until you can stay balanced on one by doing it (and falling down at first), you aren't riding a bicycle.
Information is not knowledge.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 128 posts since 22 Apr, 2011
I totally understand and acknowledge everything you say. Certainly not expecting things to come free and easy.
Yes, I'm looking for help in the internet, but, it's more of an effect than a cause. Not much time ago I was wondering how things were done and couldn't really do something practical.
Then when I decided to start finally doing things,no matter how they turned out, something started moving, and I started asking questions. Otherwise, I just couldn't ask these questions.
So I totally understand what you mean!
I admire your thoroughness, and not trying to argue. Thanks!
Yes, I'm looking for help in the internet, but, it's more of an effect than a cause. Not much time ago I was wondering how things were done and couldn't really do something practical.
Then when I decided to start finally doing things,no matter how they turned out, something started moving, and I started asking questions. Otherwise, I just couldn't ask these questions.
So I totally understand what you mean!
I admire your thoroughness, and not trying to argue. Thanks!
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
I'm just saying that the internet with all of this information right in front of you, produces a situation where it's attractive to depend on information per se. information you need, but until it's applied it doesn't have meaning per se (in and of itself).
-
- KVRAF
- 2323 posts since 4 Mar, 2004 from Portugal (Lagos)
With talent, you can make a beautiful song just in 3 chords:
Eventually something intelligent will appear written here. Watch this space.
-
- KVRAF
- 2217 posts since 15 Jul, 2003
I'm pretty sure in one of the Neil Young music DVD , he's talking about how he hired the bass player for his acoustic work and he says he likes a player who's not afraid to play simple.
Then again Neil does some very clever, but simple chord substitutions.
and textures and some small groups do an outstanding job of arranging parts.
Then again Neil does some very clever, but simple chord substitutions.
and textures and some small groups do an outstanding job of arranging parts.