developer forum rights?
-
- Beware the Quoth
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
So am I right in surmising that developers are now explicitly allowed to use their private forum privileges to target individuals within those forums, whilst suppressing any attempt at dissent?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Mr KVR
- 1591 posts since 23 Oct, 2000 from UK
- KVR Audio
Eh? Devs can moderate their forums however they wish as long as they stay within the KVR rules. That's always been the way. What's happened?
-
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
I'm referring to this post:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 10#4775010
which underlines a developer's intent to continue behaviour I believe he had explicitly been warned against by a KVR moderator, specifically including an incident last October, ie using his forum to promulgate private vendettas against KVR members, and censoring any dissent with that by any other KVR members.
The legacy of that behaviour, with the moderator's warnings now deleted, still exist at
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=330257
and
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=330351
I know for a fact that the developer emailed his entire customer base and asked them to put pressure on you, and Muse Research, to prevent that same KVR moderator from 'interfering' and to allow him to continue to single out individuals for attack without fear of any dissenting response or comment.
I'd like to know explicitly whether it is now the case that a KVR developer forum can be used to repeatedly make accusations against individuals without any means of responding to those accusations in context:
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 10#4775010
which underlines a developer's intent to continue behaviour I believe he had explicitly been warned against by a KVR moderator, specifically including an incident last October, ie using his forum to promulgate private vendettas against KVR members, and censoring any dissent with that by any other KVR members.
The legacy of that behaviour, with the moderator's warnings now deleted, still exist at
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=330257
and
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=330351
I know for a fact that the developer emailed his entire customer base and asked them to put pressure on you, and Muse Research, to prevent that same KVR moderator from 'interfering' and to allow him to continue to single out individuals for attack without fear of any dissenting response or comment.
I'd like to know explicitly whether it is now the case that a KVR developer forum can be used to repeatedly make accusations against individuals without any means of responding to those accusations in context:
be aware that i will delete any comments on this from this forum. no one is going to have their opinion changed by further discussion of the topic.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Basically, I'd like to know how much protection the developers now get above and beyond the stuff that we regular punters would get our knuckles rapped for.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Well, thanks for the confirmation. I guess using KVR to have a go at someone who's not even a member is okay for devs too.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Im not 'focussing on him', he's 'focussed' on me. And clearly feels he can do so with impunity from the safety of his developer forum.stanlea wrote:Personal hate takes its food everywhere. KVR is full of opinions, stop focusing on him and you'll be happy.
So, erm, f**k that.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- Beware the Quoth
- Topic Starter
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Making accusations against someone who's said nothing to or about you in months is not the approach of someone who wants left in peace.stanlea wrote:Nope, he wants you to leave him in peace, not the same.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 6473 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
I did enjoy the singular logic of this statement (at first it seems to be an observation then I realised it's an order):
Plus all the infamy, infamy, they've all got it info'me stuff that accompanies it.no one is going to have their opinion changed by further discussion of the topic.