Any data/quality loss at compressing waw fiels with winrar?
-
- KVRist
- 311 posts since 24 Feb, 2008
Hello,
WAW files are a lot smalles if i comperss them with RAR (stem files). I think it is because the silence in them..
So is it safe to compress stems with rar to make the pack smaller? I have a slow upload rate so this would help a lot. Thanks
WAW files are a lot smalles if i comperss them with RAR (stem files). I think it is because the silence in them..
So is it safe to compress stems with rar to make the pack smaller? I have a slow upload rate so this would help a lot. Thanks
-
crisis-at-music crisis-at-music https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=35728
- KVRist
- 375 posts since 3 Aug, 2004 from Kiel, Germany
Compressing with WINRAR is always lossless. No data will be lost in the files.
Last edited by crisis-at-music on Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Instrumental synthwave/synthpop with classical elements: https://www.feiyr.com/x/CaMResonance2022
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
- Beware the Quoth
- 35517 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
If the .rar format (or .zip or .tar etc) changed one single bit of anything it would be fundamentally useless for its purpose. The fact that for decades these formats have been used for compressing software, files which would need to be reconstituted absolutely perfectly to work, should hopefully be reassuring evidence that they don't affect any files whatsoever.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- KVRian
- 853 posts since 3 Nov, 2006 from Poland
According to the Internet - "The definition of WAW is "What A Wanker" or "What A Waste"". Or "The sound one makes when having an orgasm. A word to describe something that is orgasmic". 
Or... http://www.abbreviations.com/WAW
Or... http://www.abbreviations.com/WAW
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615
- KVRAF
- 6008 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
whyterabbyt wrote:If the .rar format (or .zip or .tar etc) changed one single bit of anything it would be fundamentally useless for its purpose. The fact that for decades these formats have been used for compressing software, files which would need to be reconstituted absolutely perfectly to work, should hopefully be reassuring evidence that they don't affect any files whatsoever.
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
You are better off compressing WAV files as FLAC, files will be smaller than Rar, and you will be able to play them directly with most computer audio players.kitkonis wrote:WAW files are a lot smalles if i comperss them with RAR (stem files). I think it is because the silence in them..
So is it safe to compress stems with rar to make the pack smaller? I have a slow upload rate so this would help a lot. Thanks
It's annoying that more sample manufactures like for example IK Multimedia, Wusik and Camel Audio (while they were alive) has not adopted such a lossless audio standard, as it would save a heck of a lot of HDD space.
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
Numanoid wrote:You are better off compressing WAV files as FLAC, files will be smaller than Rar, and you will be able to play them directly with most computer audio players.kitkonis wrote:WAW files are a lot smalles if i comperss them with RAR (stem files). I think it is because the silence in them..
So is it safe to compress stems with rar to make the pack smaller? I have a slow upload rate so this would help a lot. Thanks
The OP isn't looking for a different compression method. He wants to share stems over the internet. Converting to FLAC is not the way to share WAV stems.
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
A slight digresion into FLAC land, but the OP shouldn't worry, zipping the Wav files won't harm them in any waythecontrolcentre wrote:The OP isn't looking for a different compression method. He wants to share stems over the internet. Converting to FLAC is not the way to share WAV stems.
-
Touch The Universe Touch The Universe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=190615
- KVRAF
- 6008 posts since 2 Oct, 2008
Flac can also be converted back to wave and by converting them to this format his file would probably be much less than what it would be for winrar. Thing is another app would be required for that I think which is just another tedious step his recipient might not want to take.thecontrolcentre wrote:Numanoid wrote:You are better off compressing WAV files as FLAC, files will be smaller than Rar, and you will be able to play them directly with most computer audio players.kitkonis wrote:WAW files are a lot smalles if i comperss them with RAR (stem files). I think it is because the silence in them..
So is it safe to compress stems with rar to make the pack smaller? I have a slow upload rate so this would help a lot. Thanks
The OP isn't looking for a different compression method. He wants to share stems over the internet. Converting to FLAC is not the way to share WAV stems.
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.
TTU Youtube
TTU Youtube
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Excatly, but I wanted to disgress, and champion my cause for HDD space saving
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_archiver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_compression
Some background info about the process found here:thecontrolcentre wrote:No. The silent parts are taking up the same amount of space as the non-silent parts. The files are smaller because Winrar has compressed them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_archiver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_compression
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
Tjgoa wrote:Flac can also be converted back to wave and by converting them to this format his file would probably be much less than what it would be for winrar. Thing is another app would be required for that I think which is just another tedious step his recipient might not want to take.
Do you think converting stems from WAV to FLAC and back to WAV again won't affect the audio?
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Is this a definition of Stems that you agree on?: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_%28audio%29
"In audio production, a stem is a group of audio sources mixed together, to be dealt with downstream as one unit"
So if you got one Wav unit, converting that to FLAC and back to wav, shouldn't affect the original wav unit
"In audio production, a stem is a group of audio sources mixed together, to be dealt with downstream as one unit"
So if you got one Wav unit, converting that to FLAC and back to wav, shouldn't affect the original wav unit