Ozone 6 Advanced vs Ozone 7 Standard
-
- KVRist
- 221 posts since 21 Jul, 2015
Hello, KVR
I'm considering the purchase of Ozone mastering Suite.
Gotto keep the cost low so I decided to get second hand. Price for 6ADV and 7STD is comparable ($100-120).
Previously I tried both 6 and 7 versions and they both seems fine to me.
I don't care much for "vintage" bells and whistles, so main difference between them is IRC IV (7) and ability to use separate components as plugins + Insight (6 adv).
Questions are:
- is IRC IV significanly better then IRC III? I'm just learning mastering so I wouldn't trust myself of this now. But I need "future-proof" option.
- are separate components plugins really useful in real-life situation? I use stock plugins of Ableton, also I've got DDMF IIPRO EQ and Klanghelm DC8C2.
- what's the practival value of Insight?
I'm considering the purchase of Ozone mastering Suite.
Gotto keep the cost low so I decided to get second hand. Price for 6ADV and 7STD is comparable ($100-120).
Previously I tried both 6 and 7 versions and they both seems fine to me.
I don't care much for "vintage" bells and whistles, so main difference between them is IRC IV (7) and ability to use separate components as plugins + Insight (6 adv).
Questions are:
- is IRC IV significanly better then IRC III? I'm just learning mastering so I wouldn't trust myself of this now. But I need "future-proof" option.
- are separate components plugins really useful in real-life situation? I use stock plugins of Ableton, also I've got DDMF IIPRO EQ and Klanghelm DC8C2.
- what's the practival value of Insight?
-
- KVRist
- 161 posts since 12 Mar, 2012
Seconding soulone82 here. IRC IV is crazy good. Most transparent limiter I've used. Replaced Pro-L for me. Caveat: I did purchase IKM Stealth limiter recently, just haven't had a chance to put it to test.greedy.mf wrote:Questions are:
- is IRC IV significanly better then IRC III? I'm just learning mastering so I wouldn't trust myself of this now. But I need "future-proof" option.
Yes and no- if you are running a newer machine you could be ok with multiple instances, but overall I found Ozone modules have a heavy CPU footprint.- are separate components plugins really useful in real-life situation? I use stock plugins of Ableton, also I've got DDMF IIPRO EQ and Klanghelm DC8C2.
I like it, although it can be flaky. On OSX either AU or VST worked, the other not so much (can't remember which offhand). I have a separate computer I run it on for analysis to save CPU.- what's the practival value of Insight?
Don't count these out! I was pleasantly surprised with the Tape module, in particular. Heard good things re: the Pultec (Vintage EQ), but I have so many freaking Pultecs that I haven't touched the one in Ozone yet. Vintage limiter- I just don't get the implementation. Why base it off a Fairchild with nearly none of the features of the original unit? Especially mid/side???I don't care much for "vintage" bells and whistles,
Anyway, bottom line: my .02 is go for Ozone 7. Just for IRC IV and the Dynamic EQ its well worth it vs Ozone 6. For more general (less CPU hit) mixing duties: Alloy 2 is still a great tool and can be picked up for cheap on the KVR Buy/Sell.
-
- KVRist
- 387 posts since 6 Jul, 2016 from Newcastle UK
Yes IRC IV is significantly better. If you can afford it I would buy 7 adv because it's nice to be able to use the modules separately. I sold 7 adv for $130 so you might find it for around that price. The dynamic eq is good too.
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
IRC IV is world class but Limitless is the Rolls Royce limiter in my opinion. Mode IV is quite a bit more transparent over III.
The Advanced set gives you the modules as individual plugins which can be more economical on your CPU performance (and so can be used in mixing, not just mastering - though they are still heavier than your average).
Neutron also has a fantastic limiter, EQ with dynamics, multiband compressor etc - so might be worth considering.
The Advanced set gives you the modules as individual plugins which can be more economical on your CPU performance (and so can be used in mixing, not just mastering - though they are still heavier than your average).
Neutron also has a fantastic limiter, EQ with dynamics, multiband compressor etc - so might be worth considering.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 221 posts since 21 Jul, 2015
That's cool price.Stuart T wrote:Yes IRC IV is significantly better. If you can afford it I would buy 7 adv because it's nice to be able to use the modules separately. I sold 7 adv for $130 so you might find it for around that price. The dynamic eq is good too.
Currently lowest offer I could find is $180.
So I got Ozone 7 Standard for $90.
It should keep me occupied while I'm in training.
If I ever feel the need of upgrading, I'll but Adv and sell my standard.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 221 posts since 21 Jul, 2015
I was longing for Alloy 2 to upgrade.MogwaiBoy wrote:IRC IV is world class but Limitless is the Rolls Royce limiter in my opinion. Mode IV is quite a bit more transparent over III.
The Advanced set gives you the modules as individual plugins which can be more economical on your CPU performance (and so can be used in mixing, not just mastering - though they are still heavier than your average).
Neutron also has a fantastic limiter, EQ with dynamics, multiband compressor etc - so might be worth considering.
And while Neutron is cool, I find it's implementation of dynamic EQ quite limited - there's no attack/release settings.
I tend to keep amount of my plugs to minimum. Less decisions, less strain on workflow and wallet.
With Ozone purchased I got all my poduciton cycle covered (sound design / mixing / mastering).
Last edited by greedy.mf on Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 221 posts since 21 Jul, 2015
Sometimes I find myself thinking less options is better.phaded wrote:Don't count these out! I was pleasantly surprised with the Tape module, in particular. Heard good things
While I believe that Vintage modules are great, it'd be easier for me to stick to a certain chain and um.. master it (pun intended
Anyway Ozone has just 6 slots for modules - for all 6 of Standard. So these Vintage of Advanced are supposed to go instead of some of Standards.
Honesly I won't be able to compomise any of that, only one of equlizers, maybe.
-
- KVRist
- 161 posts since 12 Mar, 2012
Oh that's fair play. I wish they would add more slots, especially since you can load 3rd party plugins. I agree with your less-is-more point, although I can be terrible at it in practice.greedy.mf wrote:Sometimes I find myself thinking less options is better.phaded wrote:Don't count these out! I was pleasantly surprised with the Tape module, in particular. Heard good things
While I believe that Vintage modules are great, it'd be easier for me to stick to a certain chain and um.. master it (pun intended)
Anyway Ozone has just 6 slots for modules - for all 6 of Standard. So these Vintage of Advanced are supposed to go instead of some of Standards.
Honesly I won't be able to compomise any of that, only one of equlizers, maybe.
-
- KVRist
- 387 posts since 6 Jul, 2016 from Newcastle UK
Great - enjoy your new software it's really goodgreedy.mf wrote:That's cool price.Stuart T wrote:Yes IRC IV is significantly better. If you can afford it I would buy 7 adv because it's nice to be able to use the modules separately. I sold 7 adv for $130 so you might find it for around that price. The dynamic eq is good too.
Currently lowest offer I could find is $180.
So I got Ozone 7 Standard for $90.
It should keep me occupied while I'm in training.
If I ever feel the need of upgrading, I'll but Adv and sell my standard.
