PPG Infinite (by Wolfgang palm)
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 23 May, 2005 from West Country, UK
More info: http://wolfgangpalm.com/iinfinite.html
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
- KVRAF
- 37431 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
- KVRAF
- 5382 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
I am a fan of Wolfgang, but the written description of the synth is more amazing than the demo sounds so far....
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W
Y O U R
F L O W
- KVRAF
- 37431 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Yes it looks and sounds very interesting. I'll get the iPad version to test it but may get the desktop one too (got Generator but didn't get the desktop version of Mapper as I read it's still buggy but the iPad version works fine for me anyway)
- KVRAF
- 3362 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Yeah, that was pretty terrible. I know wavetables are his "thing," but it would be cool if he released a synth that didn't sound like a speak & spell losing control of its bowels. Branch out, man.Michael L wrote:I am a fan of Wolfgang, but the written description of the synth is more amazing than the demo sounds so far....
-
- KVRAF
- 6392 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
Either I don't get how this works or someone left something out of this description:
Aside from the first sentence, it seems to be talking about additive synthesis not wavetable. Not having harmonic partials for additive makes sense to me, though it could be a real PITA to program. I suspect what actually happens is that it's a bit like Tritik's Moodal: the partials start off harmonic but you can apply curves to warp them away from pure harmonics. That might explain the resonator-like sound I've been hearing in the demos.PPG wrote:At the end of the 70s Wolfgang Palm developed wavetable synthesis. This was very successful and used by many synthesizer companies in the 80s and 90s. But this technology has its limitations. The main reason is that all sounds are harmonic. In nature this does not happen very often. Many sounds like a piano string have small offsets from the harmonic frequencies. This is even stronger in sounds like bells or percussion.
Infinite overcomes this limitation. The frequencies of the overtones created by Infinite can be totally freely defined. So the sounds it produces are totally free in the frequencies of their overtones. This means that each partial wave can have an arbitrary frequency. Moreover it is possible to move these overtones independently during the duration of a note.
- KVRAF
- 37431 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Not listened to this demo but his other synths all sound wonderful (personally I think Wavegenerator has the best sound quality out of all the wavetable plugins and I have most of them).masterhiggins wrote:Yeah, that was pretty terrible. I know wavetables are his "thing," but it would be cool if he released a synth that didn't sound like a speak & spell losing control of its bowels. Branch out, man.Michael L wrote:I am a fan of Wolfgang, but the written description of the synth is more amazing than the demo sounds so far....
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 23 May, 2005 from West Country, UK
Well that would fit because the first demo that came out sounded like Kaleidoscope.Gamma-UT wrote:Either I don't get how this works or someone left something out of this description:
Aside from the first sentence, it seems to be talking about additive synthesis not wavetable. Not having harmonic partials for additive makes sense to me, though it could be a real PITA to program. I suspect what actually happens is that it's a bit like Tritik's Moodal: the partials start off harmonic but you can apply curves to warp them away from pure harmonics. That might explain the resonator-like sound I've been hearing in the demos.PPG wrote:At the end of the 70s Wolfgang Palm developed wavetable synthesis. This was very successful and used by many synthesizer companies in the 80s and 90s. But this technology has its limitations. The main reason is that all sounds are harmonic. In nature this does not happen very often. Many sounds like a piano string have small offsets from the harmonic frequencies. This is even stronger in sounds like bells or percussion.
Infinite overcomes this limitation. The frequencies of the overtones created by Infinite can be totally freely defined. So the sounds it produces are totally free in the frequencies of their overtones. This means that each partial wave can have an arbitrary frequency. Moreover it is possible to move these overtones independently during the duration of a note.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
For me it sounds very interesting since i like those sounds.
But i will wait for the mac version which i can try then (hopefully).
Later this year could mean some months away.
The thing is just with those iOS apps they cost just 1/10 of the same desktop synth then.....so why should i pay so much more.....feels wrong in my head
It will be AUv3 as well, so running several instances works too and this even could fit better for multi-touch use with the XY pads and voice per channel virtual keyboard.
There are now several little videos on you-tube from Wolfgang and it def. has that PPG character but i also find those morphs sounds very smooth. If there is one thing i hate it is steppy modulations and morphing/blending.
But of course i could really just judge it if i can take my hands on it.
But i will wait for the mac version which i can try then (hopefully).
Later this year could mean some months away.
The thing is just with those iOS apps they cost just 1/10 of the same desktop synth then.....so why should i pay so much more.....feels wrong in my head
It will be AUv3 as well, so running several instances works too and this even could fit better for multi-touch use with the XY pads and voice per channel virtual keyboard.
There are now several little videos on you-tube from Wolfgang and it def. has that PPG character but i also find those morphs sounds very smooth. If there is one thing i hate it is steppy modulations and morphing/blending.
But of course i could really just judge it if i can take my hands on it.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Lol, now we know why there is an image on the facebook site with chimps watching to a monolith.lnikj wrote:For example, what exactly am I looking at here:lnikj wrote:Yes, me too. I am not sure I quite understand what it does yet though!
We are the chimps waiting for the evolution of synth
