OMG, I just noticed. YOU were one of the people who gave me a 5.Guenon wrote:wagtunes wrote:Yeah, well you can believe what you want. I know the truth. If Jasinski had made this same track, it would have done better.
The following is around four minutes of googling. If googling more, sure to find more:
Sep 2015: "I'm pretty much done with the OSC." "I won't be entering anymore"
Feb 2016: "I'm done with the OSC."
Jul 2016: "Anyway, that's it from me. And this is my LAST OSC. This month made that decision a no brainer."
Oct 2016: "Hell, I'd be happy finishing middle of the pack month after month. But my constant finishes near the bottom do not make me happy. So I'm removing that element from my life. That's the one thing you don't know about me. When I don't like something, if I can get rid of it, I get rid of it. It's that simple."
Dec 2016: "I am done with this thread and done with the OSCs." "I promise you won't hear another peep from me in the OSC threads. You have my word."
May 2017 "I am SOOOOOOOOO glad to be done with these competitions."
Jul 2017 "I'm glad to finally be done with these. And yes, this is really my last one."
...
On a serious note: what I believe is, your "everyone is against me" routine is a crutch to help you avoid confronting what is lacking in your material and working towards developing a robust skill set that allows you to create more polished material using just one synth. It's so much easier this way.
If you don't want to improve, and instead keep groundhog daying around it in this way, it would be better just to admit the OSC isn't your particular cuppa tea.
Fake admitting it every once in a while isn't the same thing.
Even in this round. It literally went from you purportedly having found the joy of creating, meticulously doing exactly what you want to do, focusing on the material and not caring about the votes, "it finally doesn't matter to me" yada yada... to "this is hell." Like what. What. What? Wagtunes? What what?
What what what.
Going to stop, so full of what.
So what was it, a pity vote? Because obviously if you think my submission was THAT poor, you wouldn't have given me a 5 unless you felt sorry for me.
Man, the irony here is beyond mind blowing. One of the guys who gave me a 5 is getting on my case to make "better entries."
You can't make this stuff up.
But okay, if you REALLY thought it was a 5, why did I STILL end up in the bottom 25%?
I'd love to hear the answer to this.