and if i do new projects, shall i use VST3 if possible rather than VST2?
how compatible are both coexisting?
many thanks!
This.Googly Smythe wrote: Mon Nov 19, 2018 12:42 pm I think it's down to the plugin id - if they are the same, only the vst3 will be visible. Waves, for example, installs both, along with the 32 and 64 bit versions. I only ever see the vst3.
Maybe different daws handle that differently?
Slowly over time they won't have a choice.chaosWyrM wrote: Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:56 pm as mentioned in another thread like this...
theres virtually no advantage to vst3. most devs dont bother with the vst3 features...so mostly all vst3 does is take up extra space. also...you cant choose an installation location, all vst3 stuff has to get dumped in the same place.
personally i never install vst3...theres just no reason to.
Exactly. VST2 will vanish eventually. Especially with developers not even being able to license VST2 from Steinberg anymore.
Yep, same in Studio One.jancivil wrote: Wed Nov 21, 2018 5:19 pm The way Cubase or Nuendo has it, if there are two versions it shows both. VST3 is indicated by three slashes next to the plugin name
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026