BPM-less instruments
-
- KVRist
- 278 posts since 14 Mar, 2004 from I'm standing right behind you
If you're recording with instruments that can't sync to the host's BPM, is there any reason to set it?
http://www.retouchpro.com - The world's largest photo retouching community
-
- KVRAF
- 2139 posts since 15 Jul, 2003 from ex-NJ, PA
huh? Are you using midi?Doug Nelson wrote:If you're recording with instruments that can't sync to the host's BPM, is there any reason to set it?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 278 posts since 14 Mar, 2004 from I'm standing right behind you
Yep, but in this case there's no sync available. Since audio also can't sync (as there's nothing to sync) it got me thinking about times when setting the BPM might be superfluous.
http://www.retouchpro.com - The world's largest photo retouching community
- KVRAF
- 9217 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from Pequot Lakes, MN
Unless you have nothing in the track that follows a meter(highly unlikely unless you have no drums or very freeform ones),you should still set your BPM.You may want to add something that DOES sync to host tempo later.Or,you may want to chop up the resulting audio and use it somewhere as a loop.You can't do really good time/pitch stretching without knowing what BPM the loop was recorded at.
ew
ew
A spectral heretic...
-
- KVRAF
- 2139 posts since 15 Jul, 2003 from ex-NJ, PA
Well, a quarter note recorded at 150 bpm will sound half as long as one recorded at 75bpm, so it is important. Also, it makes editing easier -- for example, what if you wanted to copy measures 10-18? How are you going to know where those measures start/end without a bpm setting (without doing some math, etc.)?Doug Nelson wrote:Yep, but in this case there's no sync available. Since audio also can't sync (as there's nothing to sync) it got me thinking about times when setting the BPM might be superfluous.