My mixing, now with reverb. What do you think?
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2956 posts since 31 Jan, 2020
I'm sure you're all trying to help, albeit different methods. "all your music is rubbish!" i wouldn't go into somebody's thread and say that.
-
- KVRAF
- 5716 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
If you know what you like and this is it, why are you asking other people for feedback when it upsets you?
Maybe you've created a new genre and everyone else is wrong. It's a possibility.
Maybe you've created a new genre and everyone else is wrong. It's a possibility.
Last edited by Gamma-UT on Wed May 27, 2020 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105902 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
their comments are on them, how you choose to reply is on you
wags may go a bit far sometimes, but he is trying to help. in his own way
he just wants you to push yourself.
if you look past his turn of phrase, you will see that im sure.
you do seem like youre willing to listen, and ypure reading up on some good fundamentals with the rick snoman book.
dont be so defensive (even to aggressors) and try to take onboard suggestions as just that, suggestions, not people telling you what to do.
then you decide which suggestions work for you
wags may go a bit far sometimes, but he is trying to help. in his own way
he just wants you to push yourself.
if you look past his turn of phrase, you will see that im sure.
you do seem like youre willing to listen, and ypure reading up on some good fundamentals with the rick snoman book.
dont be so defensive (even to aggressors) and try to take onboard suggestions as just that, suggestions, not people telling you what to do.
then you decide which suggestions work for you
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Don't know who disliked it or why, but this is really great advice, spot on!Gamma-UT wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:11 pmYou're going to find it easier going through life if you don't find passive-aggressive ways to misinterpret people – especially when they have good intentions.Spring Goose wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 1:38 pm I need to rework all of my songs, regard arrangement, length, interest/excitement. I know that, but i said i'll do it in my own time. I'm thinking about it. I can't do things which i don't know how to do. In the meantime you told me to carry on putting my songs up here.
The bold bit is the problem.
From what I can tell, you're making some grand assumptions about the way dance music works and because of them, you've gone piling up a blind alley full-throttle.
I've played through a few of the pieces posted here and they have one fundamental issue: they don't groove. I get the impression you're looking at making these tracks as though it's just assembling a kit of parts. Four-on-floor beat, percussion 1, percussion 2, hats, arp, bass. Stick them all together, do some mixing and bingo! Dance magic.
The fact you've got X hundred tracks is a symptom of this. The unfortunate reality is that music of any kind but dance more than anything relies on the interplay between elements. Move things around and they either work or don't work. Rick Snoman's old videos (or Mr Bill or someone like that for more recent stuff) are instructive because of the sheer amount of arse-grinding attention to detail they use. Sometimes they'll agonise over the micro-placement of elements only to then throw them away because it wasn't quite working.
You're focused on surface details (post more tracks, post fewer tracks, pan this, EQ that) when the core question you need to answer is: does this groove? If it's not grooving, why not? If you remove things, does it groove better? If you move things around, does it groove better? And it's not simply a matter of applying swing or a groove template (though that might help).
Once you've got that, things like arrangement and mixing are going to come a lot more easily because the moves will to some extent suggest themselves in terms of "need more tension here", "need to make it more laid back there". Right now, your arrangements seem almost random (like the dub one, which just seems to stop and start for no reason).
Try to work out how Marcel Dettman can combine a kick with some background noise and still have something that's danceable (hint: there are tiny elements that follow the kick that make it sound as though it's bouncing in some way). It's not a skill anyone learns overnight (should they wish to). Maybe you think this stuff is easy because the final sound seems so basic and simple. It isn't. Simple but good is frickin' hard.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2956 posts since 31 Jan, 2020
Thanks Vurt.vurt wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:47 pm their comments are on them, how you choose to reply is on you
wags may go a bit far sometimes, but he is trying to help. in his own way
he just wants you to push yourself.
if you look past his turn of phrase, you will see that im sure.
you do seem like youre willing to listen, and ypure reading up on some good fundamentals with the rick snoman book.
dont be so defensive (even to aggressors) and try to take onboard suggestions as just that, suggestions, not people telling you what to do.
then you decide which suggestions work for you
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2956 posts since 31 Jan, 2020
I'm just putting my songs on here because i can, and see what happens.
-
- KVRian
- 597 posts since 14 Apr, 2019
Spring,
You wrote:
"I didn't want to model my tracks on Marcel Dettmann or another producer or another DJ's tracks."
I think you should spend some time quite purposely trying to sound like others. Doing so is a much quicker way to learn. It doesn't mean you will have sacrificed originality. It's just like learning to talk. First you mimic. Not doing so can often be like trying to re-invent the wheel. And then the steam engine, etc. It's going to take a lot longer to get good that way.
You wrote:
"I didn't want to model my tracks on Marcel Dettmann or another producer or another DJ's tracks."
I think you should spend some time quite purposely trying to sound like others. Doing so is a much quicker way to learn. It doesn't mean you will have sacrificed originality. It's just like learning to talk. First you mimic. Not doing so can often be like trying to re-invent the wheel. And then the steam engine, etc. It's going to take a lot longer to get good that way.
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
It's called tough love, the kind I needed.vurt wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 2:47 pm their comments are on them, how you choose to reply is on you
wags may go a bit far sometimes, but he is trying to help. in his own way
he just wants you to push yourself.
if you look past his turn of phrase, you will see that im sure.
you do seem like youre willing to listen, and ypure reading up on some good fundamentals with the rick snoman book.
dont be so defensive (even to aggressors) and try to take onboard suggestions as just that, suggestions, not people telling you what to do.
then you decide which suggestions work for you
Should I post some of the comments I've received over the many years I've been here? The best one was Brainsiztor's. I should go find it. It was a classic.
Granted, I still have a long ways to go, but I have improved a lot over the last 6 years. And the only reason I did was because I got sick and tired of people telling me that my music and mixes sucked.
Maybe that tact won't work with him. I don't know.
Anyway, I've said my peace and I'm done. He can now do whatever he likes. My conscience is clear.
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Stravinsky actually taught that the best way not only to learn, but to compose was to find a model to work from.
I reserve judgment on quality almost always. What I heard was one bar loops for drums, no variation, over and over again, so no interest is going to accrue for me, no reason to pursue a critique. But that’s not different per se than things people apparently buy, and en masse.
IDK what the goal is.
None of this shit grooves if you ask me.
I reserve judgment on quality almost always. What I heard was one bar loops for drums, no variation, over and over again, so no interest is going to accrue for me, no reason to pursue a critique. But that’s not different per se than things people apparently buy, and en masse.
IDK what the goal is.
None of this shit grooves if you ask me.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2956 posts since 31 Jan, 2020
like techno. it is techno. i said it's techno.
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
This grooves tho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqz8c4ZP3Wg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqz8c4ZP3Wg
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Not listening to 2 hours of techno but oh yes does that groove. All the subtle nuances. If I charted this song second by second and wrote down all the subtle changes, it would probably take me 2 hours just to go through the first 3 minutes of the song.Passing Bye wrote: ↑Wed May 27, 2020 5:29 pm This grooves tho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqz8c4ZP3Wg
The OP really needs to listen to this as much as possible, the way things come in and go out, the drops, the breakdowns, the whole thing. This is absolutely one of the best techno pieces I have heard. The vocals especially are so cool.
Thank you for sharing this.
THIS is great Techno.
In the meantime, I'm about 5 minutes in and can't turn it off. I am REALLY going to hate you if I listen to the whole 2 hours.
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Enjoy, it's worth it, awesome set!
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Still going 8 minutes in. At some point I do have to turn this off because I have things to do.
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105902 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
it is pretty cool. but its not really "minimal"
at least not the bits i scanned.
the boris brecht video i mean.
at least not the bits i scanned.
the boris brecht video i mean.