How can I remake this pluck?
-
- KVRer
- 13 posts since 12 Aug, 2020
Hi,
How can I remake the pluck from "I like you better"? I tried a Sine wave with reverb and EQ but this pluck is more plucky
Example: https://skiomusic.com/lauv/lauv-i-like-me-better "Chords Stem"
Thanks!
How can I remake the pluck from "I like you better"? I tried a Sine wave with reverb and EQ but this pluck is more plucky
Example: https://skiomusic.com/lauv/lauv-i-like-me-better "Chords Stem"
Thanks!
- KVRian
- 1244 posts since 25 Jan, 2017
Yup, a sinewave alone will still miss the pluck/buzz on the attack stage.
That sounds very FM-ish to me.
Like a very simple 2-operators scenario, with 1:2 C:M ratio.
Pluck-like envelope on both operators, but faster decay on the modulator.
FM index by ear (modulated by velocity if you like), every synth is different.
Then some slightly detuned unison and/or chorus. Then reverb.
There might be other ways I'm not thinking of, possibly?
That sounds very FM-ish to me.
Like a very simple 2-operators scenario, with 1:2 C:M ratio.
Pluck-like envelope on both operators, but faster decay on the modulator.
FM index by ear (modulated by velocity if you like), every synth is different.
Then some slightly detuned unison and/or chorus. Then reverb.
There might be other ways I'm not thinking of, possibly?
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 13 posts since 12 Aug, 2020
Yeah you right I succeed to remake it but I miss the sub/low bass how can I add it?Niowiad wrote: Sun Nov 15, 2020 5:40 pm Yup, a sinewave alone will still miss the pluck/buzz on the attack stage.
That sounds very FM-ish to me.
Like a very simple 2-operators scenario, with 1:2 C:M ratio.
Pluck-like envelope on both operators, but faster decay on the modulator.
FM index by ear (modulated by velocity if you like), every synth is different.
Then some slightly detuned unison and/or chorus. Then reverb.
There might be other ways I'm not thinking of, possibily?
Edit I think it's bass not sub bass cause it in 80-100Hz
- KVRian
- 1244 posts since 25 Jan, 2017
At least in my opinion, that's a different instrument/patch, playing the bass line.
And it sounds like it could easily be standard subtractive synthesis, like a deeply hi-passed saw, with a plucky envelope.
Although, the whole thing won't sound "right" without the same notes being played.
The bass is monophonic, but the pluck sounds like it's playing two notes at a time.
Something like this... https://vocaroo.com/15B3hsLkSLtz
I really didn't fine-tune the patches, it's just for the general idea.
And it sounds like it could easily be standard subtractive synthesis, like a deeply hi-passed saw, with a plucky envelope.
Although, the whole thing won't sound "right" without the same notes being played.
The bass is monophonic, but the pluck sounds like it's playing two notes at a time.
Something like this... https://vocaroo.com/15B3hsLkSLtz
I really didn't fine-tune the patches, it's just for the general idea.
-
- Patchmeister
- 1938 posts since 3 Nov, 2010
I can guarantee you that it's just a saw bass-pluck.
There's another instrument or another patch over that one higher up making it sound like one sound as the timing is exactly the same but it's just a saw and a higher note on top.
The upper note could be a something as simple as a sine
There's another instrument or another patch over that one higher up making it sound like one sound as the timing is exactly the same but it's just a saw and a higher note on top.
The upper note could be a something as simple as a sine
CHOOSX Remakes on my Youtube Channel
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 13 posts since 12 Aug, 2020
I almost there https://voca.ro/1ceWf5UvzLao It's 2 synths I need to make it more pluckyNiowiad wrote: Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:44 pm At least in my opinion, that's a different instrument/patch, playing the bass line.
And it sounds like it could easily be standard subtractive synthesis, like a deeply hi-passed saw, with a plucky envelope.
Although, the whole thing won't sound "right" without the same notes being played.
The bass is monophonic, but the pluck sounds like it's playing two notes at a time.
Something like this... https://vocaroo.com/15B3hsLkSLtz
I really didn't fine-tune the patches, it's just for the general idea.
EDIT: New version ONE SYNTH https://voca.ro/1n5eWhEexhQh it's close but I think I miss something it should be more plucky
- KVRian
- 1244 posts since 25 Jan, 2017
Slightly higher FM index?
Slightly faster decay of the modulator?
Slightly different modulator env decay curve (if the synth supports it)?
It could be a few things.
But don't beat yourself up too much, you're still very close, comparing your patches to the full context of the arrangement and post processing of the reference can be misleading at times.
Slightly faster decay of the modulator?
Slightly different modulator env decay curve (if the synth supports it)?
It could be a few things.
But don't beat yourself up too much, you're still very close, comparing your patches to the full context of the arrangement and post processing of the reference can be misleading at times.
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 16 Jun, 2023
AUTO-ADMIN: Non-MP3, WAV, OGG, SoundCloud, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and Facebook links in this post have been protected automatically. Once the member reaches 5 posts the links will function as normal.
How did you make it sound like this and how can I achieve more hard-hitting pluck??aviorrok wrote: Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:36 pm EDIT: New version ONE SYNTH https://voca.ro/1n5eWhEexhQh (https://voca.ro/1n5eWhEexhQh) it's close but I think I miss something it should be more plucky
