Pigments 3.5 vs Dune 3.5
-
- KVRian
- 517 posts since 14 Oct, 2006
Which is the better VST and why? Pigments 3.5 or Dune 3.5?
I'm thinking about getting pigments 3.5 because it's $69 for me, but something about Dune 3.5 attracts me. I think it's because Dune is supposed to be good for pads, and I like pads. Some say Dune is the best sounding synth. Is it much better than Pigments when it comes to pads and overall sound?
I'm thinking about getting pigments 3.5 because it's $69 for me, but something about Dune 3.5 attracts me. I think it's because Dune is supposed to be good for pads, and I like pads. Some say Dune is the best sounding synth. Is it much better than Pigments when it comes to pads and overall sound?
- Banned
- 4491 posts since 8 Jul, 2008 from UK
They are really different animals tbh. I wouldn't really compare them. Get both, your GAS will be your ally
Don't trust those with words of weakness, they are the most aggressive
-
AdvancedFollower AdvancedFollower https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=418780
- KVRian
- 1342 posts since 8 May, 2018 from Sweden
Both can certainly be used to create pad sounds. A pad is just a sound with a slow attack and long release. There's nothing inherently special about Dune that makes it more suitable for pads than Pigments. Both are great synths though, best as mentioned would be to try the demo versions.
Take a single oscillator, producing a drone. Send it to the wave shaper, altering the tone.
This can be a triangle, Sawtooth or a square. Modulate the pulse width, nobody will care
This can be a triangle, Sawtooth or a square. Modulate the pulse width, nobody will care
-
- KVRAF
- 9144 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
Yes both are great! I have the two, so if I were you, I would take Pigments 3.5 first then get Dune 3.5 when it is discounted (usually about $99 but I have no idea when!). I've got them also for the discounted prices
They are very usable and the first synths to load together with Predator 3. Those three synths my main bread and butter and they are actually can do 90% and up from the sounds for me.
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
-
- KVRAF
- 1637 posts since 28 Jul, 2006
Dune is definitely not the best sounding synth IMO. I do think it's good for pads. The analog section in dune sounds better in Pigments. Pigments is maybe more flexible and definitely easier and more intuitive to program (not that Dune is crazy complicated).
If you can get pigments $100 cheaper I'd do that and think about Dune when it goes on sale.
If you can get pigments $100 cheaper I'd do that and think about Dune when it goes on sale.
- KVRAF
- 6295 posts since 12 Jan, 2018
As others have mentioned, get both. Pigments 3.5 first, as $69 is a great deal to pass on if you like it.
Dune 3.5 has a different sound and workflow. Get it the next time it goes on sale, but guess the wait will be longer (Summer 2022). I think it goes on sale for $129 a couple of times and only once a year for $99 (in November).
Dune 3.5 has a different sound and workflow. Get it the next time it goes on sale, but guess the wait will be longer (Summer 2022). I think it goes on sale for $129 a couple of times and only once a year for $99 (in November).
-
- KVRAF
- 3399 posts since 26 Mar, 2002 from london
Never tried Dune but they keep stuffing more features in Pigments, and realistically there's no much it can't do, and too many options for anyone to really exhaust. I'm actually not such a fan of the UI modulation system, though it's fine, I just prefer the speed of something like Phaseplant, so I don't use Pigments that much. But if I were starting out it would be a great option, since it covers almost everything.
Every day takes figuring out all over again how to f#ckin’ live.
-
- KVRian
- 659 posts since 10 Oct, 2018
Perhaps it's easier to compare Pigments 1 to Dune 1
(yes, I learned math and apply it where it can make life easier)
Ok, Pigments is more inviting to play, but I'd use Dune to make a movie score or EDM (I do neither).
Per Mr nachenko, both are nice for Synthwave
(yes, I learned math and apply it where it can make life easier)
Ok, Pigments is more inviting to play, but I'd use Dune to make a movie score or EDM (I do neither).
Per Mr nachenko, both are nice for Synthwave
Last edited by Dencheg on Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Weapons of choice (subject to change):
Godin Redline, Kuassa, Fuse Audio, Audiority, Roland A-500pro, Dune, Dagger, TAL, Reaper for Rock & Synthwave pleasures; Viper and FL Studio for guilty EDM pleasures
Godin Redline, Kuassa, Fuse Audio, Audiority, Roland A-500pro, Dune, Dagger, TAL, Reaper for Rock & Synthwave pleasures; Viper and FL Studio for guilty EDM pleasures
- KVRist
- 387 posts since 4 Apr, 2021
Some say Pigments 3 is quite heavy on CPU but Dune 3 is light… That might be something to consider also. But try both of the demo versions and see how they work for your setup.
-
- KVRAF
- 3496 posts since 30 Dec, 2014
Look at freeware poly synths before deciding. https://u-he.com/products/zebralette/
KVR S1-Thread | The Intrancersonic-Design Source > Program Resource | Studio One Resource | Music Gallery | 2D / 3D Sci-fi Art | GUI Projects | Animations | Photography | Film Docs | 80's Cartoons | Games | Music Hardware |
- KVRAF
- 4589 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
I can confirm this. Never bothered about Dune CPU or RAM usage, but with Pigments 3 it became an issue. And my gear is still pretty powerful.Bartone wrote: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:23 am Some say Pigments 3 is quite heavy on CPU but Dune 3 is light… That might be something to consider also. But try both of the demo versions and see how they work for your setup.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
-
- KVRian
- 659 posts since 10 Oct, 2018
In defense of Pigments, a lot of visual stuff is going on real-time (no visual stuff is happening in case of Dune).
Both approaches have proponents. I'd say if OP has any inclination for (to?) the constant visual feedback, get Pigments while it's on sale
Both approaches have proponents. I'd say if OP has any inclination for (to?) the constant visual feedback, get Pigments while it's on sale
Weapons of choice (subject to change):
Godin Redline, Kuassa, Fuse Audio, Audiority, Roland A-500pro, Dune, Dagger, TAL, Reaper for Rock & Synthwave pleasures; Viper and FL Studio for guilty EDM pleasures
Godin Redline, Kuassa, Fuse Audio, Audiority, Roland A-500pro, Dune, Dagger, TAL, Reaper for Rock & Synthwave pleasures; Viper and FL Studio for guilty EDM pleasures
-
- KVRAF
- 3399 posts since 26 Mar, 2002 from london
I've found Pigments fine for CPU use if one creates one's own patches. A lot of presets have every module switched on.
Every day takes figuring out all over again how to f#ckin’ live.
- KVRian
- 920 posts since 12 Jan, 2004 from Boston, MA
They are two of the most popular and powerful synths on the market right now, so you are not going to make a mistake buying either. Pigments is the better overall synth, and is far more flexible. Dune has a smaller sweet spot, but that sweet spot is ... sweeter?
Pigments has one of the (if not the) best interfaces out there, and it's a lot of fun to use. You can effectively "see" everything going on, nicely.
Many people love the Dune UI. I am not one of those people. I find it infuriatingly tab-heavy. It is quite hard to "see" what is going on.
Pigments is great for more experimental sounds. It's great for the more ambient side of things, as it is somewhat "thinner" and more surgical in tonality. Dune, while it has some very nice ambient pads and plucks, definitely seems to lean more toward the "produced" end of the spectrum. If you're producing trance or EDM or other "heavier" genres, Dune is the no-brainer and you may end up disappointed with Pigments.
...My two cents, anyway, to be taken with a large grain of salt. It should be said that I don't use either of these synths very often.
(But I am ... atypical.) I prefer Spire to Dune, and I prefer ... a mix of things to Pigments, but let's say "VPS Avenger" to keep it in the ballpark.
...That said, I own both, I have both installed, and I have used Pigments, at least, on a few tracks (I think it's probably the best granular synth you can use these days, so if you need that sound, get it). I haven't found a place for Dune yet, but I do like to keep it around, because the sound quality is pretty top-notch (plus people talk about it here on KvR all the time, so I like to have it handy to do comparisons).
Pigments has one of the (if not the) best interfaces out there, and it's a lot of fun to use. You can effectively "see" everything going on, nicely.
Many people love the Dune UI. I am not one of those people. I find it infuriatingly tab-heavy. It is quite hard to "see" what is going on.
Pigments is great for more experimental sounds. It's great for the more ambient side of things, as it is somewhat "thinner" and more surgical in tonality. Dune, while it has some very nice ambient pads and plucks, definitely seems to lean more toward the "produced" end of the spectrum. If you're producing trance or EDM or other "heavier" genres, Dune is the no-brainer and you may end up disappointed with Pigments.
...My two cents, anyway, to be taken with a large grain of salt. It should be said that I don't use either of these synths very often.
...That said, I own both, I have both installed, and I have used Pigments, at least, on a few tracks (I think it's probably the best granular synth you can use these days, so if you need that sound, get it). I haven't found a place for Dune yet, but I do like to keep it around, because the sound quality is pretty top-notch (plus people talk about it here on KvR all the time, so I like to have it handy to do comparisons).
