Opinions on Behringer QX2442USB mixer?

Anything about hardware musical instruments.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

I nearly just bought it today but thought I'd see what opinions are out there for this mixer. I can get this for NZ$679 at Music Planet, as opposed to the straight X2442USB from another dealer at $899 which is a considerable difference (they sell the QX at $759 but no stock). Having hunted around, and even Behringer manuals etc the only differences I can see are the QX has Klark-Teknik FX onboard (possibly an improvement on the old version?) and not rack-mountable.
Image

Rack-mountable is not an issue for me - extremely unlikely to want to.
Klark-Teknik - maybe better? TBH the onboard FX are a nice-to-have for sketching tracks out but I'm unlikely to be recording them anyway - I'll use better plugins mostly.

My usage - mostly for sketching out tracks, not wanting studio quality recording.
I'll likely record hw synths directly still rather than via mixer, though might do both as it lets me use hw comps etc more easily
Likely to have everything into mixer via patchbay - meaning recording direct via patchbay is still easy.
Won't be recording multiple tracks at once, so the 4bus/direct outs are nice but not essential. Def will get use, but again it's a bonus, not necessary.
USB - not sure. I might use the Behringer on-board one and it has capability to feed back the DAW into the mixer. But the mixer USB is limited at 48kHz/16bit, so my UR22 is better quality already and can also do a input/DAW mix. Nice to have both options, though most likely going to use my own interface.

Pros - USB, loads more channels than competition, shit-full of features, great price, seems to be mostly balanced option for the mains, it even has comps on channels!
Cons - probably not as good quality/clarity as other mixers, can't think of any other cons :? . (EDIT - only 60mm faders, but at this price no other mixers have 100mm either).

Haven't used a Behringer mixer for ages - my last experience was the old Euro mixers that were good value but IMO had muddy Eq and noticeable cross-channel bleed. But surely they've improved quality since then? And if not recording as such with it, the cross-talk is mainly a non-issue if it still exists but might record via mixer if the quality is there. Eq - nice to have but I likely won't actually record with it. I could get nominally better mixers for same price but with less features/channels and I need those channels.

Opinions?
Last edited by kritikon on Sun Jul 16, 2023 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post

I've seen Studiomaster mixers at similar prices - the Club series. TBH they look cheaper build (even on a promo pic the fader handles were all at different angles). I used to have a StudioMaster P7 24-channel back in the day and was very happy with it, but dunno if Studiomaster are the same company they used to be 30 yrs ago. And I get fewer channels for same price without all the extra bells & whistles of Behringer. A&H, yeah but have you seen how small their mixers are at that price? Mackie - same issue.

Post

Looks inspired on Mackie 1604. It has inserts, aux sends, group buses: complete. Not bad.

Can the usb connection deliver individual channels to your daw, not just the main stereo bus?
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. Image
My MusicCalc is served over https!!

Post

No, USB only has stereo out, but it has direct outs if I want to record from it (not sure if all channels have direct outs, but at least the 8 mono channels do). 2 channels USB is OK for me though. It does seem to have everything...4bus, 4 aux (2 pre & 2 post), decent FX, balanced. Most of the competition aren't balanced, only have 2 aux, mostly no busses.

TBH it kinda threw me how much it offers. Apparently the mic pres are surprisingly good and clean. My only worry is how clean the channels are. There's the odd grumble about mixer reliability, but my own experience of Behringer gear is rock solid, though I never owned their mixers...

Post Reply

Return to “Hardware (Instruments and Effects)”