Any Benefit to Upgrading USB3.1 Gen1 to USB3.1 Gen2 for an audio interface?
-
- KVRAF
- 2312 posts since 9 Jun, 2002 from East of Santa Monica
MY PC's onboard USB3 ports are USB 3.1 Gen1 (5 GPS).
I have a Steinberg UR24c interface on the way.
Would there be any benefit to adding a USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 GPS) PCIe card? (Lower latency, improved response times, etc)?
TIA
I have a Steinberg UR24c interface on the way.
Would there be any benefit to adding a USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 GPS) PCIe card? (Lower latency, improved response times, etc)?
TIA
- KVRAF
- 16888 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Not really. Steinberg says that specific interface happily works with USB 2.0, plenty of bandwidth there...
Faster? How? It will by definition be at the rate dictated by your ASIO driver.
The only thing that will benefit from the extra bandwidth is a device like a external disk drive or monitor, but only if you connect that over USB 3/C.
Faster? How? It will by definition be at the rate dictated by your ASIO driver.
The only thing that will benefit from the extra bandwidth is a device like a external disk drive or monitor, but only if you connect that over USB 3/C.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
- KVRAF
- 2982 posts since 31 Jan, 2003 from Ghent, Belgium
Why mention 'audio' at all? Files are files, in a file transfer context.Shinizzle wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 12:26 pm Maybe I should have stated audio 'files' for the uninitiated.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2312 posts since 9 Jun, 2002 from East of Santa Monica
Thanks for the replies. Very helpful.
I'm kicking myself that I hadn't thought of that, considering I do sometimes transfer large amounts of data to my external USB3 drives.Shinizzle wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 6:31 am Not really although if you have lots of audio to transfer over usb that would be faster
- KVRian
- 1188 posts since 21 Aug, 2017 from Brasil
No, but can get lower DPC latency withflugel45 wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 5:03 am MY PC's onboard USB3 ports are USB 3.1 Gen1 (5 GPS).
I have a Steinberg UR24c interface on the way.
Would there be any benefit to adding a USB 3.1 Gen2 (10 GPS) PCIe card? (Lower latency, improved response times, etc)?
TIA
viewtopic.php?p=8667750#p8667750
For lower RTL latency, try higher sampling rates(need more CPU power)
and/or lower ASIO buffer or change to a RME audio interface.
https://gearspace.com/board/music-compu ... -base.html
- KVRAF
- 2982 posts since 31 Jan, 2003 from Ghent, Belgium
Only if your drives support Gen2 transfer speeds too.flugel45 wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2023 12:48 pm I'm kicking myself that I hadn't thought of that, considering I do sometimes transfer large amounts of data to my external USB3 drives.
(I could be wrong, but I don't think that there are many non-SSD 'Gen2 or faster' external drives out there)
- KVRian
- 1314 posts since 7 Apr, 2019 from Canada
None at all, it's only for hard drives, blue ray drives, virtual reality, memsticks, and external graphics cards, that sort of thing. Was actually based on esata at one point if I remember correctly.
I don't make audio products anymore. I sell furniture & smart products.
-
- KVRist
- 31 posts since 27 Jun, 2020
If you have older case to ciz a hole , Windows and some tech skills. You can by a RME HDSP PCI Card. I used the StarForce PCI PCIE adapter. This gives you lower latency and reduce CPU by 10% on large Projects.
This is arround 150 and Projekt for a Weekend. Replaced my USB soundcard 3 years ago.
Worked on Intel z370 and now AMD5 Board on Windows 10/11.
This is arround 150 and Projekt for a Weekend. Replaced my USB soundcard 3 years ago.
Worked on Intel z370 and now AMD5 Board on Windows 10/11.
