Feature request? (re: 'Foes' list)
-
ThoughtExperiment ThoughtExperiment https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7790
- KVRian
- 1064 posts since 26 Jun, 2003 from UK
This would be nice, although I guess it's complicated: when I add someone to my 'foes' list, their responses to any thread I might look at are blocked, as I'd expect. However, if somebody else quotes them in a response to one of my 'foes' post, I can see the blocked post again. Which is kind of frustrating. So it would be nice to 'block' someone, including when someone else quotes them.
I wouldn't ask, but there are more and more (what I'd call) 'spammers' disrupting some of the threads here, and it's becoming more and more of a nuisance.
I wouldn't ask, but there are more and more (what I'd call) 'spammers' disrupting some of the threads here, and it's becoming more and more of a nuisance.
- KVRAF
- 13693 posts since 19 Jun, 2008 from Seattle
That ^^^
I assume it is 'complicated' as well, but it would be really nice. I personally don't care for the "friend or foe" designation, and would prefer a simple "ignore" button. A few too many (relatively new) aspiring rebel-martyr trolls, just pushing buttons over-and-over-and-over to get a response, so they can be demeaning, condescending, or in some manner hyper-critical towards the non-compliant respondent, repeatedly exposing their shallowness, and well ensconced vainglorious-ity. [2c]
I assume it is 'complicated' as well, but it would be really nice. I personally don't care for the "friend or foe" designation, and would prefer a simple "ignore" button. A few too many (relatively new) aspiring rebel-martyr trolls, just pushing buttons over-and-over-and-over to get a response, so they can be demeaning, condescending, or in some manner hyper-critical towards the non-compliant respondent, repeatedly exposing their shallowness, and well ensconced vainglorious-ity. [2c]
I'm not a musician, but I've designed sounds that others use to make music. http://soundcloud.com/obsidiananvil
-
- KVRian
- 1133 posts since 8 Oct, 2004 from Australia
The thumbs down needs to be brought back too.
I know it upset some, but I would hope it would make people consider what they are about to post rather than just shoot off irrelevant noise.
I know it upset some, but I would hope it would make people consider what they are about to post rather than just shoot off irrelevant noise.
-
- KVRAF
- 2296 posts since 23 May, 2012 from London
-
ThoughtExperiment ThoughtExperiment https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7790
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1064 posts since 26 Jun, 2003 from UK
Oops, sorry about that. The last thing I would want is to spam a post about banning spammers more comprehensively
At least the topic has gained a little more traction
At least the topic has gained a little more traction
-
- KVRAF
- 2296 posts since 23 May, 2012 from London
No need to apologise, it's nice to know I'm not the only one who feels this way!ThoughtExperiment wrote: Sun Jun 07, 2026 8:26 am Oops, sorry about that. The last thing I would want is to spam a post about banning spammers more comprehensively![]()
At least the topic has gained a little more traction![]()
Always Read the Manual!
- KVRist
- 463 posts since 10 Jan, 2026
That just encourages negativity, it would be better to remove the thumbs completely imo
-
Karbon L. Forms Karbon L. Forms https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29033
- KVRian
- 1408 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Inverness, Scotland
Not going to happen. Not soon anyway. Quoting as it is now just injects a bunch of text/markup into the reply. (Which can be edited/faked etc). It would have to change to being the entire full quoted post (no editing down) with user name etc. followed by the reply as a separate post. Then the system could hide the quoted post as normal. Now, when someone quotes the quoted post? oh dear. lol
.................................
"Hell is other People" J.P.Sartre
.................................
"Hell is other People" J.P.Sartre
.................................
