in fact, i've got a long and personnal experience in working with samplers
(from Roland S10 during late eighties, the mirage, the Akai S950, then S1000...actually S2000 and a few softsamplers (EXS24 and NN-XT)
But at the present time i've never tried to work on sample's design with higher frequencies and deeper bit resolution than 16 bits / 44.1 Khz
so and for my guidance, i'm asking the one of you that are experienced to tell us if there is an obvious interest and potentiality of increasing the quality of our samples by taking and treating them through any digital processes in an overall better resolution ?
...and if it is the case, when it obviously appears during your work ?
advantage of hiest resolutions in sampling ? (ex : 24/96khz)
- KVRAF
- 6504 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
it would be good if people sometimes used the search...
http://www.kvr-vst.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 2&start=30
most of this thread was voodoo beliefs but there were some good points made towards the end.
Also, a good place to find out more about the advantages would be gearslutz.com (again with search function).
Just be ready to shovel the important information thru all the voodoo (ie halfway understood theories).
Like many topics, this one pops up about once a month and depending on the time sometimes you'll find more sane answers.
Search is your friend.
http://www.kvr-vst.com/forum/viewtopic. ... 2&start=30
most of this thread was voodoo beliefs but there were some good points made towards the end.
Also, a good place to find out more about the advantages would be gearslutz.com (again with search function).
Just be ready to shovel the important information thru all the voodoo (ie halfway understood theories).
Like many topics, this one pops up about once a month and depending on the time sometimes you'll find more sane answers.
Search is your friend.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6504 posts since 25 May, 2002 from Bobo-dioulasso\BF__Geneva/CH
sorry ...
...the main interest for me was the quality of single sample transposition's rendering's quality (and especially transposing down )
...i've just read quickly the linked topic that is more oriented to MIXING
( witch seems to be a bit different case... )
I'n gonna have a deeper look on all of it, don't worry...
(and to be honest i still in conflict with the use of search engine in general )
...the main interest for me was the quality of single sample transposition's rendering's quality (and especially transposing down )
...i've just read quickly the linked topic that is more oriented to MIXING
( witch seems to be a bit different case... )
I'n gonna have a deeper look on all of it, don't worry...
(and to be honest i still in conflict with the use of search engine in general )
Last edited by Krakatau on Wed Nov 17, 2004 6:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Time for me to go sit in the corner for being a bitchy know-it-all-self-appointed-forum-cop. 
