wanting cheap/free lush strings like verve's bitterswt symp
-
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 30 Jul, 2004
The Verve lifted that string section off a Beatle's album. A large majority of the proceeds from the Verve's hit CD was paid to the Beatles, and far less to the Verve's group members.
Had the Verve re-recorded that passage with live string players (or a set of samples), they could have saved huge dollars.
Perhaps the Verve tried, but just couldn't get the perfect take?
You can lift the original passage yourself, and get the exact sound.
One of the string sections from the sf2 files at
www.sf2midi.com
with a little EQ might satisfy your needs for a free ride.
Had the Verve re-recorded that passage with live string players (or a set of samples), they could have saved huge dollars.
Perhaps the Verve tried, but just couldn't get the perfect take?
You can lift the original passage yourself, and get the exact sound.
One of the string sections from the sf2 files at
www.sf2midi.com
with a little EQ might satisfy your needs for a free ride.
- something special
- 8627 posts since 16 Mar, 2002 from Birmingham, Alabama
I think you mean something to do with the rolling stones. never understood the story myself, but then, the royalties go to jagger\richardshefty wrote:The Verve lifted that string section off a Beatle's album. A large majority of the proceeds from the Verve's hit CD was paid to the Beatles, and far less to the Verve's group members.
Had the Verve re-recorded that passage with live string players (or a set of samples), they could have saved huge dollars.
Perhaps the Verve tried, but just couldn't get the perfect take?
You can lift the original passage yourself, and get the exact sound.
One of the string sections from the sf2 files at
www.sf2midi.com
with a little EQ might satisfy your needs for a free ride.
-
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 30 Jul, 2004
It was a hard copy rag on the news stand (so much for accuracy in media) that said it was the Beatles, but I just looked it up on the net and apparently the Rolling Stones' label gets the cash:
The Verve were forced to pay 100% of their royalties from their hit "Bittersweet Symphony" for the use of an unlicensed sample from an orchestral cover version of The Rolling Stones' hit "The Last Time".
It is a land mark case in sampling, thanks for clearing up the facts.
The Verve were forced to pay 100% of their royalties from their hit "Bittersweet Symphony" for the use of an unlicensed sample from an orchestral cover version of The Rolling Stones' hit "The Last Time".
It is a land mark case in sampling, thanks for clearing up the facts.
- something special
- 8627 posts since 16 Mar, 2002 from Birmingham, Alabama
that really sux for the verve; such a great tune - never would have taken it for 'the last time'hefty wrote:It was a hard copy rag on the news stand (so much for accuracy in media) that said it was the Beatles, but I just looked it up on the net and apparently the Rolling Stones' label gets the cash:
The Verve were forced to pay 100% of their royalties from their hit "Bittersweet Symphony" for the use of an unlicensed sample from an orchestral cover version of The Rolling Stones' hit "The Last Time".
It is a land mark case in sampling, thanks for clearing up the facts.
- addled muppet weed
- 111294 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
bluedad wrote:that really sux for the verve; such a great tune - never would have taken it for 'the last time'hefty wrote:It was a hard copy rag on the news stand (so much for accuracy in media) that said it was the Beatles, but I just looked it up on the net and apparently the Rolling Stones' label gets the cash:
The Verve were forced to pay 100% of their royalties from their hit "Bittersweet Symphony" for the use of an unlicensed sample from an orchestral cover version of The Rolling Stones' hit "The Last Time".
It is a land mark case in sampling, thanks for clearing up the facts.
the cash in question actually goes into a charity,which i suppose aint too bad but had the verve asked before hand they wouldnt be in the situation so lessons to be learned i guess
-
- KVRian
- 1196 posts since 15 May, 2002 from Triple-Octo-Core, 128GB RAM, Midi sequencer Pro-16
100 % of the royalities? Were they punished for adding a bit of spice to that ole men's sound? Shouldn't the Stones be grateful in the meantime if they get attention in any way by some ... ah f**k, I'm stoned, just think it's ridiculous to give the whole roylities to the old men.
- something special
- 8627 posts since 16 Mar, 2002 from Birmingham, Alabama
thanks for adding that; it really steamed me off, like mick and keith really need the money.vurt wrote:
the cash in question actually goes into a charity,which i suppose aint too bad but had the verve asked before hand they wouldnt be in the situation so lessons to be learned i guess
but if it goes to charity, cool for them.
sample clearing, yes it makes sense doesn't it. I mean, on your biggest hit you want everything nice and clean, eh.
- addled muppet weed
- 111294 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
think it was shelter that got the money?
or may have bee n warchild but years ago there was a cd well 4 cd singles released with various artists coverin gimme shelter for charity and it went to the same place.
either way it made the verve,they had been around for years before the case so it works both ways
or may have bee n warchild but years ago there was a cd well 4 cd singles released with various artists coverin gimme shelter for charity and it went to the same place.
either way it made the verve,they had been around for years before the case so it works both ways
-
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 30 Jul, 2004
The 100% royalty loss is because they lifted sample(s) and replicated too much of the melody from the same recording. A fancy entertainment lawyer could have gotten them off if:
Had the Verve re-recorded the strings, they would at most be liable to only pay a mechanical royalty (typical of cover songs).
Had the Verve created a new melody (and yet still used lifted samples) they could have likely obtained a more favorable clearance arrangement or other settlement.
Had the Verve re-recorded the strings, they would at most be liable to only pay a mechanical royalty (typical of cover songs).
Had the Verve created a new melody (and yet still used lifted samples) they could have likely obtained a more favorable clearance arrangement or other settlement.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
okay are there any other strings out there? Please? Im dying here. I really want nice sounds. I really really really want this, Please?
full lushy orchestral... high vibrato, airy... passionate romantic strings...
RonC
full lushy orchestral... high vibrato, airy... passionate romantic strings...
RonC
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 3 Dec, 2003 from BELGIUM
AUTO-ADMIN: Non-MP3, WAV, OGG, SoundCloud, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and Facebook links in this post have been protected automatically. Once the member reaches 5 posts the links will function as normal.
There are some options :* There is Sonic Implants Symphonic strings Mini
(which I believe come in SF2)
http://www.sonicimplants.com/PremiumStringsMini.asp (http://www.sonicimplants.com/PremiumStringsMini.asp)
* More expensive but has all the options and
articulations is East West Quantum Leap Orchestra
It comes in 3 flavours : Silver (kinda "Light" ed.), Gold (the prosumers version) and the Platinium strings (top notch quality) The first 2 contain also percussion & brass instruments.
http://www.soundsonline.com/sophtml/det ... sku=EW-155 (http://www.soundsonline.com/sophtml/details.phtml?sku=EW-155)
* Primesounds session strings ( a smaller section, but very airy sounding , great for pop) and a bargain
http://www.primesounds.com/ (http://www.primesounds.com/)
HTH
JVB
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
I used some downloadable soundfonts to recreate the strings quite convincingly. I will have to post them when I get home tonite..
