legal issues
-
- KVRer
- 14 posts since 13 Oct, 2004 from Breda, NL
Lo,
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*
-Jhn.
-
- KVRAF
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
It would be a stupid thing to do – quite often the software writes id into your music files – so its pretty easy to tell who has used what – when and if it’s a legal version or not.joehaann wrote:Lo,
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*
Take a look at the MS issue, not to mention sample stamps etc.
Something to think about
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
not to mention everyone here will come down on you with a mighty wrath. 
-
- KVRist
- 296 posts since 8 Mar, 2003 from Boston, MA
Hey Joehaann, stealing is not the answer. Spread your wealth, convert your illegal software collection into legal by sending lots of money to all the happy developers who made those appz for you!! Spread thejoehaann wrote:Lo,
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*
serge
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
I'm not sure what sample stamps are beyond the MS thing. And even then, they were only discovered because the tag said "Zone Team." Had it been some form of keygen crack no one would've had know.
I doubt the likely hood of being caught is high, but if releasing the music is important to you, probably wise not take the risk. Aside from the ethical/moral reasons not to use illegal software, a general approach to any situation with possible legal implications is to always keep yourself beyond reproach.
I doubt the likely hood of being caught is high, but if releasing the music is important to you, probably wise not take the risk. Aside from the ethical/moral reasons not to use illegal software, a general approach to any situation with possible legal implications is to always keep yourself beyond reproach.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 14 posts since 13 Oct, 2004 from Breda, NL
this wasnt the issue really, cuz it doesn't concern me (besides for the essay)serge wrote:Hey Joehaann, stealing is not the answer. Spread your wealth, convert your illegal software collection into legal by sending lots of money to all the happy developers who made those appz for you!! Spread thejoehaann wrote:Lo,
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*!!
![]()
serge
but yea, apart from that, i do have some stuff here - but my intention was to buy software when i have the money (being a student, and not a rich one tbh) and send it to a -regular- label.. whats the point of netlabels anyway.
-Jhn.
-
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 1 Sep, 2004
Yes! Definately.joehaann wrote:Lo,
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*
Imagine the following situation:
You use a cracked version of Cubase SX, a cracked Version of Vanguard and Kontkt and a cracked version of Ozone.
Then your songs have all a signature (smart encoded sample stamp each 44100 samples) whit the crack IDs of all the software and your name (loaded from your registry) and your IP.
If anyone playes or downloades your file on his computer, then the signatures are transmitted to Microsoft and then directly shipped to a consortium (not named here).
Then you get a visit from some strange lookin people with black clothes soon for sure ...
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 14 posts since 13 Oct, 2004 from Breda, NL
are you taking the piss? why in gods name send it to MSjackle&hyde wrote:Yes! Definately.joehaann wrote:Lo,
was wondering if anyone knows about netlabels and 'legal issues', with this i mean; is it possible for anyone to release tracks on a netlabel that are made with software not legally obtained?
*curious*
Imagine the following situation:
You use a cracked version of Cubase SX, a cracked Version of Vanguard and Kontkt and a cracked version of Ozone.
Then your songs have all a signature (smart encoded sample stamp each 44100 samples) whit the crack IDs of all the software and your name (loaded from your registry) and your IP.
If anyone playes or downloades your file on his computer, then the signatures are transmitted to Microsoft and then directly shipped to a consortium (not named here).
Then you get a visit from some strange lookin people with black clothes soon for sure ...
ah.. hell, nevermind, i'll write some other shit to fill up / complete my work.. cant be arsed
thanks anyway (:
-Jhn.
-
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 1 Sep, 2004
-
- KVRer
- 2 posts since 16 Jan, 2005
Oh my god hyde,
For a sec there I thought you meant what you said.
For a sec there I thought you meant what you said.
- KVRAF
- 9064 posts since 1 Aug, 2003
It's not Microsoft the sample stamps are sent to.